Arrest warrant issued for Netanyahu over Israel’s war in Gaza by International Criminal Court

Nah. And it’s a certainty a dipshit like you would never know anyway.
You were wrong to claim that the ICC was an "extension of the United Nations" but an adult, a real man, would concede this rather tiny point and admit error, it really is a minor detail but no, you can't do that, that's being honest and you aren't honest.

If the ICC was in any way beholden to the UN then we'd need a UN resolution to reach decisions like issuing warrants and because the US is a permanent member of the security council it would veto such a resolution.

So it is obvious that the ICC is entirely independent of the UN and decisions made by UN members within the UN have no bearing whatsoever on the decisions that the ICC makes, none and that's what has upset the loonies in the far right, the MAGATS who believe every person on earth should be subject to the whims of the United States.
 
Netanfuckyou is a piece of shit!

Israelis are pussies! They murder journalists in Lebanon, then call them terrorists. Problem is, when they went through the rubble, there were no terrorists, only journalists.

Israelis are liars! They are too ***** to tell the truth!

 
RE: Arrest warrant issued for Netanyahu over Israel’s war in Gaza by International Criminal Court
SUBTOPIC: ICC Arrest Warrants
⁜→ All anti-Israeli Contributors, et al,

OK, I need some help here. Where is the redacted warrant?

ARREST WARRANT SEARCH
Please lead me to the link for the "Actual" Warrants. I did a court warrant search by name, country, and individual case (32 in all). I see no outstanding warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

I see that the Arrest Warrants were classified as ‘SECRET,' wherein the Prosecutor and the court claim that witnesses required special safeguards. Additionally, the court considered the necessity to extend protection to the ongoing investigations itself. Hummm!

It is probably the case that the International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor might have a very weak case. Such witness protection is usually extended → when the evidence is limited to a very few (if not) a single witness. It looks very suspicious to me. In politically charged cases, the hidden identities are to keep the opposing council from doing research that would taint the credibility of the witness.

(JUST MY THOUGHT)

In cases in which the Prosecutor is protecting a general population (upward of 70% to 80%) that supports a designated terrorist organization (Islamic Resistance and Jihadist), the court itself (as well as the Prosecutor) might be considered aiding and abetting a criminal syndicate.

1725791645336.png
......
1725791700982.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Except for the fact that it clearly is.

That’s the part you missed, you stupid ****.
This is the way of the MAGAT, lies is their only weapon, it's all they can do when challenged - lie and lie and lie, over and over and over.

When you're testicles descend try searching the web for "is the icc an extension of the un" do that and share the results with all of us here.

This is what I get from Google and then from Bing Copilot

1732560438651.webp


and

1732560548652.webp


Please show me your search results where you see "Yes, the IIC is an extension of the UN" because you must have read this somewhere - but where...
 
RE: Arrest warrant issued for Netanyahu over Israel’s war in Gaza by International Criminal Court
SUBTOPIC: ICC Arrest Warrants
⁜→ All anti-Israeli Contributors, et al,

OK, I need some help here. Where is the redacted warrant?

ARREST WARRANT SEARCH
Please lead me to the link for the "Actual" Warrants. I did a court warrant search by name, country, and individual case (32 in all). I see no outstanding warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

I see that the Arrest Warrants were classified as ‘SECRET,' wherein the Prosecutor and the court claim that witnesses required special safeguards. Additionally, the court considered the necessity to extend protection to the ongoing investigations itself. Hummm!

It is probably the case that the International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor might have a very weak case. Such witness protection is usually extended → when the evidence is limited to a very few (if not) a single witness. It looks very suspicious to me. In politically charged cases, the hidden identities are to keep the opposing council from doing research that would taint the credibility of the witness.

(JUST MY THOUGHT)

In cases in which the Prosecutor is protecting a general population (upward of 70% to 80%) that supports a designated terrorist organization (Islamic Resistance and Jihadist), the court itself (as well as the Prosecutor) might be considered aiding and abetting a criminal syndicate.

1725791645336.png
......
1725791700982.png

Most Respectfully,
R

See: New York Times (for example)

The text of the warrants was kept secret to protect witnesses, the court said in its statement, but the judges released some details “since conduct similar to that addressed in the warrant of arrest appears to be ongoing.”
 
This is the way of the MAGAT, lies is their only weapon, it's all they can do when challenged - lie and lie and lie, over and over and over.

When you're testicles descend try searching the web for "is the icc an extension of the un" do that and share the results with all of us here.

This is what I get from Google and then from Bing Copilot

View attachment 1046477

and

View attachment 1046478

Please show me your search results where you see "Yes, the IIC is an extension of the UN" because you must have read this somewhere - but where...
You bloviate a lot.

The UN assembly voted for the treaty.

The treaty was deposited with the UN General Secretary.

The second article of the treaty (among other articles) addresses the authority of the UN.

AND Shithead Homeless clings to the fantasy that it has nothing to do with the UN. 😂😂😂😂😂
 
That's because you are clueless about war crimes, the Rome Statute and the Geneva Conventions. Take a look at the charges Netanyahu faces, deprivation of food, water, reckless attacks on schools and hospitals and the truckloads of evidence supporting these charges.

Not at all, it cheered me up immensely. Its encouraging to see that the Zionist tentacles were powerless to interfere with the court, despite all the threats and insidious nastiness from them, they were powerless.

View attachment 1046432

In my opinion the Israeli's themselves should have arrested the scumbag for publicly denying the role of the Third Reich in the Holocaust in 2015, that's actually a crime under Israeli law and has been since 1986 but of course the law wasn't enforced because Zionists are all entitled to say and do as they please with impunity.

That these the entitled Zionists and the evil apartheid regime expect sympathy and support is beyond sickening.
Its not a war crime to bomb urban areas that the enemy is using to make war on Israel
 
RE: Arrest warrant issued for Netanyahu over Israel’s war in Gaza by International Criminal Court
SUBToPIC: Selective Enforcement
⁜→ All anti-Israeli Contributors, et al,

(BLUF)

Trying to justify selective enforcement in criminal and humanitarian law is simply not viable as an accepted practice. It is not "equal protection" when applied to International, Individual States and Nations, or as applied against individuals.

(Copiied from Richard) So here we have US senator Lindsey Graham demanding the ICC to prosecute Putin, but he loses his enthusiasm when the same court targets Netanyahu......
(COMMENT)

Criminalizing cultural differences or ignoring universally accepted ethical and moral precepts inevitably results in a flaw of selective enforcement. That will be a point of contention and a reduction in the confidence of the legal system. Such selective enforcement will raise concerns that the law and the legal system are improperly structured and will be viewed, in the long run, as a form of discrimination.

IF there are two cases in which two perpetrators take very similar actions, THEN they are either both prosecuted or dismissed. They can not be treated differently.

(FOR CONSIDERATION)

The General Assembly (GA) may make non-binding recommendations or recommend the members to sign on to a treaty (Chapter IV of the Charter). However, the GA cannot make international law. Resolutions by the UN GA are non-binding.

{Example} The US is not a signatory to the Rome Statute. The Rome Statutes are not binding on the US. It is a political question.

1725791645336.png

1725791700982.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
15th post
Despite more than a year of warnings that starvation is just around the corner, there is no evidence of starvation, just food insecurity, which is always the case in war zones.
How would you know? You get all your news from Fox News. As such, you know nothing that is accurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom