Army Charges Bergdahl as a Deserter

Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer I've been told and confirmed by two other sources that ( Bergdahl )his attorney was given what we call a charge sheet,” Lt. Col. Shaffer told O’Reilly. “A charge sheet is the results of the investigation listing out the articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice that have been violated. The key violation is desertion. And this is, has been done. The decision has been made,” asserted.



I just started reading this thread but I know that your post isn't true.

The military came out yesterday and said no decisions have been made about whether to charge him or not.

You might want to rely on a CREDIBLE source of news.

Pentagon disputes that a decision has been made in Bowe Bergdahl case | HeraldNet.com - Northwest
 
Oh that race card, overused to the point of total ineffectiveness!

I doubt anyone clamoring to get that turd back knew the current facts. At that time is was just a missing man, and not a known deserter. He left of his own accord, and no resources should have been wasted to "rescue" him. Obama thought he was making a move, which would shine a positive light on himself. He was a bit mistaken.

Actually, the details of the circumstances of his disappearance were reported on in Rolling Stone in 2012 by Michael Hastings.

Bowe Bergdahl America s Last Prisoner of War by Michael Hastings Rolling Stone

The circumstances were known to the Right Wing. They just didn't care. This was another thing they could ding Obama on in an election year.

Until he actually got the guy freed. Then he went from being the poor prisoner of war that Obama was doing nothing to save to the worst traitor since Jane Fonda, Benedict Arnold and Judas Iscariot combined.

McCain other Republicans called for Obama to get Bergdahl s release then condemned it

Yeah Rolling Stone is a bastion of news.
 
That there is funny. The Mullahs in Iran released the hostages ONE FUCKING DAY after Reagan was sworn into office.
Apparently the Mullahs were told they had one day or each of them would be swallowing a MOAB with one gulp.

Reagan was a competent Commander in Chief. Hussein Obama not so much so.
Oh? Need we remind you of this?

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And afterwards, Cut n' run......taught OBL a lesson about how to beat Americans.
 
Ha, so predictable. The Communist in Chief is pressuring the Military to drop the charges. Who didn't see that one coming? Look for him to sack more Generals over this one. Those making this decision better watch their backs. He's got his FBI and IRS Henchmen ready to attack.
There's gremlin on your shoulder.....

They really should watch their backs. The Communist in Chief is known to be hateful and treacherous. His FBI and IRS Henchmen are standing by.

They are? Who are these henchmen? Link, please.
 
You can bet the Hussein administration is going apeshit behind the scenes trying to stop it.
As CiC obbie can order them to drop it if he wants. There's some political risk but there's political fallout if it goes through, so they are probably debating it. Everything is political with these people.

Debating it is putting it lightly. More like threats and/or bribes going down to shut this thing down.
So you say. Got any evidence that that is happening?
It's called deductive reasoning. Not exactly a liberal strong point.

No, it's called unsubstantiated speculation, something that is often seen among conspiracy theorists.
 
You can bet the Hussein administration is going apeshit behind the scenes trying to stop it.
As CiC obbie can order them to drop it if he wants. There's some political risk but there's political fallout if it goes through, so they are probably debating it. Everything is political with these people.

Debating it is putting it lightly. More like threats and/or bribes going down to shut this thing down.
So you say. Got any evidence that that is happening?
It's called deductive reasoning. Not exactly a liberal strong point.

No, it's called unsubstantiated speculation, something that is often seen among conspiracy theorists.
Anyone willing to trade 5 of the worse Gitmos prisoners for a deserter for political gain is capable of leaning on a subordinate for political gain. Not recognizing it is called having your head up your ass.
 
As CiC obbie can order them to drop it if he wants. There's some political risk but there's political fallout if it goes through, so they are probably debating it. Everything is political with these people.

Debating it is putting it lightly. More like threats and/or bribes going down to shut this thing down.
So you say. Got any evidence that that is happening?
It's called deductive reasoning. Not exactly a liberal strong point.

No, it's called unsubstantiated speculation, something that is often seen among conspiracy theorists.
Anyone willing to trade 5 of the worse Gitmos prisoners for a deserter for political gain is capable of leaning on a subordinate for political gain. Not recognizing it is called having your head up your ass.

Where's the logical connection between a simple prisoner swap and the Obama pressuring the military brass to drop charges after an investigation by the JAG? That would be an unlawful order from the CnC and I doubt the military brass would follow such an order, being as most are conservatives.
 
Ha, so predictable. The Communist in Chief is pressuring the Military to drop the charges. Who didn't see that one coming? Look for him to sack more Generals over this one. Those making this decision better watch their backs. He's got his FBI and IRS Henchmen ready to attack.
and you're basing this statement on what exactly?

The Communist in Chief is known to be hateful and treacherous. He will order his FBI and IRS Henchmen to attack those making this decision. They should definitely be prepared for such attacks.

Paranoid conspiracy theory worthy of 3 tinfoil hats out of 5.
 
Debating it is putting it lightly. More like threats and/or bribes going down to shut this thing down.
So you say. Got any evidence that that is happening?
It's called deductive reasoning. Not exactly a liberal strong point.

No, it's called unsubstantiated speculation, something that is often seen among conspiracy theorists.
Anyone willing to trade 5 of the worse Gitmos prisoners for a deserter for political gain is capable of leaning on a subordinate for political gain. Not recognizing it is called having your head up your ass.

Where's the logical connection between a simple prisoner swap and the Obama pressuring the military brass to drop charges after an investigation by the JAG? That would be an unlawful order from the CnC and I doubt the military brass would follow such an order, being as most are conservatives.
Simple prisoner swap? That's what you call it? And obbie has fired generals that didn't pound his salami the right way.
 
It was a simple prisoner swap, something the military had done with its enemies for what? 235 - give or take - years now.

Generals who are insubordinate with their superiors resign or retire or are reassigned or punished through the UCMJ. Just like Colonels, or Majors, or Captains, or Lieutenants, or Sergeant Majors or any soldier of any rank. What's your point?
 
So you get them whitewashing the fact Nidal Hasan was obviously crazy, or not washing Bradley/Chelsea Manning out of boot camp despite his not knowing which gender he was. Or taking Bergdahl into the Army after he washed out of Coast Guard basic Training.
Joey, you were in the military. You don't need to prove the low standards of recruits.

Which is more than you'll ever accomplish...
 
Her teleprompter broke?
Why doesn't she write her notes on her hand?
 
Where's the logical connection between a simple prisoner swap and the Obama pressuring the military brass to drop charges after an investigation by the JAG? That would be an unlawful order from the CnC and I doubt the military brass would follow such an order, being as most are conservatives.

Have any other presidents in history releases terrorists to gain the release of deserters on the field of battle, or is this incompetent fuck Obama unique?
 
Her teleprompter broke?
Why doesn't she write her notes on her hand?

Because that causes you communists to break down in uncontrollable weeping. She figured that you've be okay with a teleprompter, given that your little tin god can't even state his name without one.
Huh?
Given that she reads her "Obama...goshy, darny, teleprompter, hyuk..." jokes from a teleprompter she should at least make sure it has fresh batteries.
 

Forum List

Back
Top