Armed Americans stop 35% of active shootings...

Armed Americans stop 35% of active shootings...

Lol, I enjoyed that :laughing0301:
 
How fucking stupid. The Crime Prevention Research Center? LMAO.


FBI, Crime Prevention Research Center, who to believe. Damn, it is laughable that anyone would be on the fence. I mean it is like that stupid Lott survey, the defensive use of hand guns. Damn wind blows a tree limb against the window, damn gun nut jumps out on his porch, fires blindly into the night, swears to God he hit one of the SOB's. Lott goes, defensive use of a gun. Probably is, all those people hit exceed the total amount of emergency visits for EVERY FUCKING THING.
Harvard debunked the vast majority of these brave self defence rhetoric stories. The only defence Americans need is from deluded gun nuts like 2aguy. He'll be shitting himself if they bring in a law against misinformation because he's candidate no.1

Not read his op because I have the clown on ignore, but I imagine it's full of copy and paste shite.
 
Yes.....the FBI, the gestapo of the democrat party, has to protect the agenda of the democrat party....

The FBI reported that armed citizens thwarted 4% of active shooter incidents, while the CPRC found 35%.

Two factors explain this discrepancy – one, misclassified shootings; and two, overlooked incidents. Regarding the former, the CPRC determined that the FBI reports had misclassified five shootings: In two incidents, the Bureau notes in its detailed write-up that citizens possessing valid firearms permits confronted the shooters and caused them to flee the scene. However, the FBI did not list these cases as being stopped by armed citizens because police later apprehended the attackers. In two other incidents, the FBI misidentified armed civilians as armed security personnel. Finally, the FBI failed to mention citizen engagement in one incident.


Some Nazi organization says a number you like better so it makes it true . You people are brain dead.
CPRC
These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.


  • Overall, we rate the Crime Prevention Research Center Right Biased based on strongly advocating for guns and the conservative agenda. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting based on a few failed fact checks.

  • Just slightly to the left of Nazi's
 
Jbander fake quoting me.
This MAGA fuck , is a wimpy little child. I have eaten him up and spit him out every time we have met in these forums. He seems a little upset about it hence the gibberish. He seems to be trying to make a point on something no one said. That's a new drift. When you lose that badly you get pushed of the mark and have nothing but nonsense to make a point with. Kind of funny but also kind of sad. The American little birdie seems to be a awfully sore loser.
 
This MAGA fuck , is a wimpy little child. I have eaten him up and spit him out every time we have met in these forums. He seems a little upset about it hence the gibberish. He seems to be trying to make a point on something no one said. That's a new drift. When you lose that badly you get pushed of the mark and have nothing but nonsense to make a point with. Kind of funny but also kind of sad. The American little birdie seems to be a awfully sore loser.
Post 50. You changed what I said. Easily verified.
 
Post 50. You changed what I said. Easily verified.
Ya bullshit hero, you are a scummy little liar .This worm waste ever ones time arguing about things that didn't happen trying to show some semblance of his words meaning something because I've buried his ass every time I've dealt with this piece of shit lies.
 
Post 50. You changed what I said. Easily verified.
This MAGA fuck , is a wimpy little child. I have eaten him up and spit him out every time we have met in these forums. He seems a little upset about it hence the gibberish. He seems to be trying to make a point on something no one said. That's a new drift. When you lose that badly you get pushed of the mark and have nothing but nonsense to make a point with. Kind of funny but also kind of sad. The American little birdie seems to be a awfully sore loser.
 
Back
Top Bottom