Arizona Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrat Machine Crimelord Adrian Fontes on 2020 Election Fraud:

[The2ndAmendment]

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

Enjoin is the verb form of injunction. A court enjoins something when it issues an injunction against it.

 

[The Original Tree]

 

[Dogbiscuit]

View attachment 411855

If true, bombshell would be an understatement..

 

[The2ndAmendment]

If true, bombshell would be an understatement..

Are you fucking kidding? The link is directly from the Arizona government website.

 

[Oddball]

View attachment 411855

Interesting claim, though the logistics of doing this throughout the thousands of precincts and counties seems an impossible task.

 

[theHawk]

Adrian Fontes is a fucking communist. He had cheated before yet he still remains.

I met the guy running against him, hope he wins. But it’s tough when the guy counting the votes is a corrupt piece of shit.

 

[Dogbiscuit]

If true, bombshell would be an understatement..

Are you fucking kidding? The link is directly from the Arizona government website.

My comment was in response to The Original Tree. I didnt know that his post and yours correlated.
And Im not into procreating with children.

 

[justinacolmena]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/enjoin#:~:text=Enjoin%20is%20the%20verb%20form,issues%20an%20injunction%20against%20it .
--> Enjoin is the verb form of injunction. A court enjoins something when it issues an injunction against it.

More or less. An injunction is a commandment -- most of which orginially, the Ten, were of the form "thou shalt not" -- that is, negative injunctions.

An "affirmative" injunction, i.e. a positive order by a court to do something. is grammatically possible, but legally problematic, because courts lack legal basis to impose or require specific works, operations, or actions, except as punishment for crime, which is generally not applicable in civil cases.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

theHawk
The Original Tree
Oddball
RodISHI
Angelo
Hossfly

Wow imagine a communist USMB mod moved this thread to conspiracy even though the entire OP is quoted directly from the Arizona Court website?

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

 

[RodISHI]

Gonna happen just press on and ignore the antics. Those who get too hung up on it will have a hard time. They're the ones we should be concerned about. It will be very hard on them. That's one of the problems with covert programs.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Can a Moderator come forth and explain why an OP containing only links and quotes from the Arizona Court Website was moved to Conspiracy?

 

[Hellokitty]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

 

[westwall]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

It's a part of the paper making process. You provide them the paper. They print the ballot. The Democrat criminals don't know about the paper so use off the shelf paper.

Busted.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

Thats not a problem.
Especially when they're saying this has been in the works since 2018.

 

[Hellokitty]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

It's a part of the paper making process. You provide them the paper. They print the ballot. The Democrat criminals don't know about the paper so use off the shelf paper.

Busted.

I'm gonna need some youtube evidence...surely someone out there has a mass mailed out ballot they could pt under whatever light.

 

[Hellokitty]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

Thats not a problem.
Especially when they're saying this has been in the works since 2018.

Okay I'm still confused. Read something about this and it sounds like it can track ballots? If so that would explain some of the ballots that had been dumped in the last several weeks were found. I'll admit when they started finding ballots being trashed so quickly I thought it was odd, like who see a trash bag and decides let me go through it to see if there are any election ballots...

U.S. Postal Service Counters Trump Attacks On Mail-In Voting With A New Blockchain Patent

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published a U.S.P.S. patent application on a 'Secure Voting System' using blockchain technology. Trump’s complaints against mail-in voting on who cast the vote and whether the ballot was tampered with could be answered with the help of blockchain.

www.forbes.com

 

[RodISHI]

View attachment 411855

I don't get it how did they watermark millions of ballots being printed all over the place?

It's a part of the paper making process. You provide them the paper. They print the ballot. The Democrat criminals don't know about the paper so use off the shelf paper.

Busted.

I'm gonna need some youtube evidence...surely someone out there has a mass mailed out ballot they could pt under whatever light.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

theHawk
The Original Tree
Oddball
RodISHI
Angelo
Hossfly

Wow imagine a communist USMB mod moved this thread to conspiracy even though the entire OP is quoted directly from the Arizona Court website?

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

I guarantee you it was one of two mods here,the way they operate is they see the title of the thread and if they don’t like it,they move it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

Enjoin is the verb form of injunction. A court enjoins something when it issues an injunction against it.

Hell yeah man it was.