Are You Still A Racist, Xenophobic, and Intolerant Hater?

[The ClayTaurus]

Hey that is the first intelligent thing you have said so far. . .good job. . . ..


The sum of this anti-Semitic demonlogy was that Jews, by design or ignorance, had used the movies to undermine traditional American values. As one antagonist put it, "It is only because they [the Hollywood Jews] are outside the moral sphere of American culture that they blunder so badly that they require periodic campaigns such as that of the Legion of Decency [a Catholic reform group] to set them right.”

Neal Gabler , “An Empire of Their Own : How the Jews Invented Hollywood” `(New York: 1988) page 2.

As we have already said, they cannot endure to hear or to see that we accursed Goyim should glory in the Messiah as our chemdath, and that we are as good as they are or as they think they are. Therefore, dear Christian, be advised and do not doubt that next to the devil, you have no more bitter, venomous, and vehement foe than a real Jew who earnestly seeks to be a Jew.

Luther's Works: The Christian In Society IV. Vol 47. American Edition. Edited by Franklin Sherman. (Philadelphia: 1981) ISBN: 0-8006-0347-8. Page 217.

Arno C. Gaebelein took a trip to his native Germany in 1937. He described his impressions in a letter to William Bell Riley, who published it in the Pilot. Gaebelein condemned most American press reports about the “new Germany” as slanderous and erroneous. It was obvious to him that Hitler had been taking necessary steps to stop the spread of Jewish-inspired Bolshevism. There is no question in my mind that Hitler was an instrument of God to save Germany and Europe from the Red Beast.”(32)

Timothy P. Weber, “On the Road to Armageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel's Best Friend” (Grand Rapids: 2004) Page 143.

Consider that the quality of response you garner is often reflective of the quality of your own post.

Shit in
Shit out

 

[Annie]

Consider that the quality of response you garner is often reflective of the quality of your own post.

Shit in
Shit out

Seems to be a meeting of the minds.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Seems to be a meeting of the minds.

You really should put that word in quotes.



Perhaps an exchange of vows are in order. Is anyone ordained?

 

[Annie]

You really should put that word in quotes.



Perhaps an exchange of vows are in order. Is anyone ordained?

WOW! You and RWA want to marry? I thought you were both strait! :shocked: Man o' man...

 

[Annie]

WOW! You and RWA want to marry? I thought you were both strait! :shocked: Man o' man...

Whoops, that would be Shagar and RWA, never mind, Clay is trying to marry them off. They are strait, at least sexually.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Whoops, that would be Shagar and RWA, never mind, Clay is trying to marry them off. They are strait, at least sexually.

Oh no you don't. I'm shutting the water off. You opened this can of worms, now PLAY IN IT

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Yeah. I guess it's our role in the world to help the jews establish Israel. Just remember who they're establishing it for. The Lord? Read a little closer. They're definitely using satan's tactics too. Double standards, lies, villainizations as needed. Keep up the good fight you good little B'nai Noah bootlickers.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Yeah. I guess it's our role in the world to help the jews establish Israel. Just remember who they're establishing it for. The Lord? Read a little closer. They're definitely using satan's tactics too. Double standards, lies, villainizations as needed. Keep up the good fight you good little B'nai Noah bootlickers.

Your halo is blinding me.

 

[Shattered]

Your halo is blinding me.

That's my halo. People keep stealing it.

 

[Shamgar]

Yeah. I guess it's our role in the world to help the jews establish Israel. Just remember who they're establishing it for. The Lord? Read a little closer. They're definitely using satan's tactics too. Double standards, lies, villainizations as needed. Keep up the good fight you good little B'nai Noah bootlickers.

. . . . it is to spread jewish supremacy. . . . via democracy. . .aka mob rule. . . ask the nephew of Sigmund Frued. . . . Edward Bernays who worked for the U.S. Committee on Public Information

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 37.
U.S. Committee on Public Information – WWI

“Fortunately, the sincere and gifted politician is able, by the instrument of propaganda, to mold and form the will of the people.”
Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 109.

“Ours must be a leadership democracy administered by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses. Is this government by propaganda? Call it, if you prefer, government by education.”

Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 127-128.

The majority vote is by no means the real public opinion. Its basically irrational character greatly reduces its power to rule in a democracy. Democracy is based on the concept that man is rational and capable of clearly seeing what is in his own interest, but the study of public opinion suggests this is a highly doubtful proposition. And the bearer of public opinion is generally a mass man, psychologically speaking, which makes him quite unsuited to properly exercise his right of citizenship.
Jaques Ellul, “Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes” (New York: 1973) Page 124.

The leverage provided by organizations on the fulcrum that is American democracy has helped Jews all the way from finally-getting-that-office-job-denied-me to the federal government's assistance to harassed Soviet Jews. In a sense our organizations have served as a sectarian government (albeit not elected by popular Jewish vote) within a secular government, that of the popularly elected legislative and executive branches of the American government. In a context concerned with the flow of Jewish history, Albert Memmi held that what really counts for Jews is political sovereignty. He maintained that the Diaspora-rooted Jewish tradition was essentially the product of Jews having been colonialized. Our evolving Jewish behavior, indeed our philosophy for survival, was crafted as a weapon of defense, used by us to survive as colonials. In the unique American democracy it has been our organizations which have converted our individual “colonial” status and made us a “bloc,” a “lobby,” no longer the lonely and the powerless, pitied but unheeded.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 69-70.

----------------------------------------------------------
Sectarian n. : 1. An adherent of a sect. 2. a narrow or bigoted person.

Sovereign n: 1. one possessing the supreme power and authority in a state.

Colonialism n: control by one power over a dependent area or people; also : a policy advocating or based on such control.

Further, notwithstanding the long-time neutrality of the state toward discrimination, a neutrality which functionally aided and abetted practicing bigots, and which was finally shaken by the Johnson Administration's civil-rights laws, our national rhetoric, rhetoric though it was, served Jews and other discriminated-against minorities well. The ideals of that rhetoric and its constitutional source provided accommodating context and legal for the struggle against racial and religious discrimination. Also, no matter these ideals were late in being translated into law, so long as they were official American rhetoric, the bigot's “un-American” practices were in the dock, and his victim's brief was an echo of the Bill of rights and of the fourth of July. Today, for all the significant progress Jews have made in the United States, for all that we have never, in all the millenia of our wanderings, enjoyed a safe harbor than here in the United States, Jews are nonetheless uneasy.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 32.

To be sure, Jews constitute but 2.7% of the U.S. Population. However, our acutal percentage of the total vote approximates 5% and while even 5% is itself a small figure, given our deployment in the major states and the electoral college system, the 1980 Jewish voting distribution augurs well for both Democractic and Republican future attentiveness. At least quadrenally.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 284.

The American Way has been our deponent to the truth-in-advertising of our Jewish advertisement for ourselves. Democracy's catechism that All Men Are Created equal; our legal precept that individuals not groups are responsible before the law; the idealization of the individual in American's passion play. The Western; the reality as well as the romance of the Pioneer America; Horatio Alger and capitalism itself have all borne witness to the credibility of Jewish public-relations themes stressing that persons should be judged for what as individuals the are rather than by the natal accident of race, color, or creed. Outsiders, defined as such by anti-Jewish prejudice, we sought to deflect attention from our social handicap, our group identity. In it's place, Jewish organizations, corporately so to speak, instead stressed the centrality of the individual to the American Way. In a sense Jews, the oldest and still champion master practitioners of ethnicity actually argued the irrelevancy of ethnicity. And it worked. It worked because the resonance of All Men Are Created Equal, the nostalgic affection and longing for the frontier's individualism , and the very dynamics of rugged capitalism are strong influences on Americans than their prejudices. This is not to say that Jews cynically wrapped themselves in the flag in order to gain acceptance. Rather was it a case of a people who had deliberately chosen to come to America in quest of promised freedom and finding that in part at least to it was being withheld, determined to hold its promisor to his word. In the the process and far from incidentally, our celebration of the American ideal of individual worth, self-serving though it has been, gave sinew and vitality to the ideal itself. Our civil-rights briefs in state court and in the Supreme Court, our Congress, our scholarly papers, our propaganda for, refuge in, and spear-carrying in behalf of All Men Are Created Equal and its panoply of accompanying democratic cliches not only worked well for us, it worked well for others looking in but also barred from entry, and it made of the Statue of Liberty a respectable woman.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 43.

In short, when a lobby [AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee] stifles free speech nationally on one controversial topic – the Middle East – all free speech is threatened.

Paul Findely, (former Republican Congressman of Illinois for 22 years) “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby,” (Westport: 1985) Page 332.

Almost without exception, House and Senate members do its bidding, because most of them consider AIPAC to be the direct Capitol Hill representative of a political force that can make or break their chances at election time.

Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 25

Most Congressional actions affecting Middle East policy are either approved or inititated by AIPAC. [AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee]

Paul Findely, (former Republican Congressman of Illinois for 22 years) “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby,” (Westport: 1985) Page 32.

Almost without exception, House and Senate members do its bidding, because most of them consider AIPAC to be the direct Capitol Hill representative of a political force that can make or break their chances at election time.

Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 25


In practice, the lobby groups [AIPAC, ADL, AJC] function as an informal extension of the Israeli government. This was illustrated when AIPAC helped draft the official statement defending Israel's 1981 bombing of the Iraqi nuclear reactor, then issued it the same hour as Israel's embassy. No major Jewish organization ever publicly takes issue with positions and policies adopted by Israel. Thomas A. Dine, executive director of AIPAC, spoke warmly of President Reagan's peace plan when it was announced in September 1982, but as soon as Israel rejected the plan Dine fell silent.
Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 26-27.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

. . . . it is to spread jewish supremacy. . . . via democracy. . .aka mob rule. . . ask the nephew of Sigmund Frued. . . . Edward Bernays who worked for the U.S. Committee on Public Information

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 37.
U.S. Committee on Public Information – WWI

“Fortunately, the sincere and gifted politician is able, by the instrument of propaganda, to mold and form the will of the people.”
Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 109.

“Ours must be a leadership democracy administered by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses. Is this government by propaganda? Call it, if you prefer, government by education.”

Edward Bernays, “Propaganda” (Brooklyn: Copyright 1928/ ReCopyrighted 2005), page 127-128.

The majority vote is by no means the real public opinion. Its basically irrational character greatly reduces its power to rule in a democracy. Democracy is based on the concept that man is rational and capable of clearly seeing what is in his own interest, but the study of public opinion suggests this is a highly doubtful proposition. And the bearer of public opinion is generally a mass man, psychologically speaking, which makes him quite unsuited to properly exercise his right of citizenship.
Jaques Ellul, “Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes” (New York: 1973) Page 124.

The leverage provided by organizations on the fulcrum that is American democracy has helped Jews all the way from finally-getting-that-office-job-denied-me to the federal government's assistance to harassed Soviet Jews. In a sense our organizations have served as a sectarian government (albeit not elected by popular Jewish vote) within a secular government, that of the popularly elected legislative and executive branches of the American government. In a context concerned with the flow of Jewish history, Albert Memmi held that what really counts for Jews is political sovereignty. He maintained that the Diaspora-rooted Jewish tradition was essentially the product of Jews having been colonialized. Our evolving Jewish behavior, indeed our philosophy for survival, was crafted as a weapon of defense, used by us to survive as colonials. In the unique American democracy it has been our organizations which have converted our individual “colonial” status and made us a “bloc,” a “lobby,” no longer the lonely and the powerless, pitied but unheeded.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 69-70.

----------------------------------------------------------
Sectarian n. : 1. An adherent of a sect. 2. a narrow or bigoted person.

Sovereign n: 1. one possessing the supreme power and authority in a state.

Colonialism n: control by one power over a dependent area or people; also : a policy advocating or based on such control.

Further, notwithstanding the long-time neutrality of the state toward discrimination, a neutrality which functionally aided and abetted practicing bigots, and which was finally shaken by the Johnson Administration's civil-rights laws, our national rhetoric, rhetoric though it was, served Jews and other discriminated-against minorities well. The ideals of that rhetoric and its constitutional source provided accommodating context and legal for the struggle against racial and religious discrimination. Also, no matter these ideals were late in being translated into law, so long as they were official American rhetoric, the bigot's “un-American” practices were in the dock, and his victim's brief was an echo of the Bill of rights and of the fourth of July. Today, for all the significant progress Jews have made in the United States, for all that we have never, in all the millenia of our wanderings, enjoyed a safe harbor than here in the United States, Jews are nonetheless uneasy.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 32.

To be sure, Jews constitute but 2.7% of the U.S. Population. However, our acutal percentage of the total vote approximates 5% and while even 5% is itself a small figure, given our deployment in the major states and the electoral college system, the 1980 Jewish voting distribution augurs well for both Democractic and Republican future attentiveness. At least quadrenally.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 284.

The American Way has been our deponent to the truth-in-advertising of our Jewish advertisement for ourselves. Democracy's catechism that All Men Are Created equal; our legal precept that individuals not groups are responsible before the law; the idealization of the individual in American's passion play. The Western; the reality as well as the romance of the Pioneer America; Horatio Alger and capitalism itself have all borne witness to the credibility of Jewish public-relations themes stressing that persons should be judged for what as individuals the are rather than by the natal accident of race, color, or creed. Outsiders, defined as such by anti-Jewish prejudice, we sought to deflect attention from our social handicap, our group identity. In it's place, Jewish organizations, corporately so to speak, instead stressed the centrality of the individual to the American Way. In a sense Jews, the oldest and still champion master practitioners of ethnicity actually argued the irrelevancy of ethnicity. And it worked. It worked because the resonance of All Men Are Created Equal, the nostalgic affection and longing for the frontier's individualism , and the very dynamics of rugged capitalism are strong influences on Americans than their prejudices. This is not to say that Jews cynically wrapped themselves in the flag in order to gain acceptance. Rather was it a case of a people who had deliberately chosen to come to America in quest of promised freedom and finding that in part at least to it was being withheld, determined to hold its promisor to his word. In the the process and far from incidentally, our celebration of the American ideal of individual worth, self-serving though it has been, gave sinew and vitality to the ideal itself. Our civil-rights briefs in state court and in the Supreme Court, our Congress, our scholarly papers, our propaganda for, refuge in, and spear-carrying in behalf of All Men Are Created Equal and its panoply of accompanying democratic cliches not only worked well for us, it worked well for others looking in but also barred from entry, and it made of the Statue of Liberty a respectable woman.

Nathan Perlmutter and Ruth Ann Perlmutter. “The Real Anti-Semitism In America” (New York: 1982) page 43.

In short, when a lobby [AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee] stifles free speech nationally on one controversial topic – the Middle East – all free speech is threatened.

Paul Findely, (former Republican Congressman of Illinois for 22 years) “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby,” (Westport: 1985) Page 332.

Almost without exception, House and Senate members do its bidding, because most of them consider AIPAC to be the direct Capitol Hill representative of a political force that can make or break their chances at election time.

Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 25

Most Congressional actions affecting Middle East policy are either approved or inititated by AIPAC. [AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee]

Paul Findely, (former Republican Congressman of Illinois for 22 years) “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby,” (Westport: 1985) Page 32.

Almost without exception, House and Senate members do its bidding, because most of them consider AIPAC to be the direct Capitol Hill representative of a political force that can make or break their chances at election time.

Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 25


In practice, the lobby groups [AIPAC, ADL, AJC] function as an informal extension of the Israeli government. This was illustrated when AIPAC helped draft the official statement defending Israel's 1981 bombing of the Iraqi nuclear reactor, then issued it the same hour as Israel's embassy. No major Jewish organization ever publicly takes issue with positions and policies adopted by Israel. Thomas A. Dine, executive director of AIPAC, spoke warmly of President Reagan's peace plan when it was announced in September 1982, but as soon as Israel rejected the plan Dine fell silent.
Paul Findley, “They Dare Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby” (Westport: 1985) p. 26-27.

You're like an anti-jew Teddy Ruxpin

 

[Shamgar]

You're like an anti-jew Teddy Ruxpin

I will help your small mind with a little correction. . .I am not "anti-jew" since Christ was a Jew. . .aka Semite. . . so I am not "antisemitic" but I am anti-anti-Christ . . .

“For many deceivers HAVE entered into the world, who do not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh. This is the DECEIVER AND THE ANTICHRIST. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.” 2 John 1:7-9

“Young ones, it is a last hour, and as you heard that the Antichrist is coming, EVEN NOW MANY ANTICHRISTS HAVE RISEN UP, from which you know that it is a last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they were of us, they would have remained with us; but they left so that it might be revealed that they all are not of us.” I John 2:18-19

“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God; and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is THE ANTICHRIST YOU HEARD IS COMING, AND EVEN NOW IS ALREADY IN THE WORLD.” 1 John 4:2-3

“And when Silas and Timothy had come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit and testified to the Jews that Jesus is the Christ. And they resisting and blaspheming, shaking his garment, he said to them, Your blood is on your own heads. I am pure from it . From now on I will go to the nations.” Acts 18:5-6

Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. Matthew 27:25

 

[The ClayTaurus]

I will help your small mind with a little correction. . .I am not "anti-jew" since Christ was a Jew. . .aka Semite. . . so I am not "antisemitic" but I am anti-anti-Christ . . .

“For many deceivers HAVE entered into the world, who do not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh. This is the DECEIVER AND THE ANTICHRIST. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.” 2 John 1:7-9

“Young ones, it is a last hour, and as you heard that the Antichrist is coming, EVEN NOW MANY ANTICHRISTS HAVE RISEN UP, from which you know that it is a last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they were of us, they would have remained with us; but they left so that it might be revealed that they all are not of us.” I John 2:18-19

“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God; and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is THE ANTICHRIST YOU HEARD IS COMING, AND EVEN NOW IS ALREADY IN THE WORLD.” 1 John 4:2-3

“And when Silas and Timothy had come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit and testified to the Jews that Jesus is the Christ. And they resisting and blaspheming, shaking his garment, he said to them, Your blood is on your own heads. I am pure from it . From now on I will go to the nations.” Acts 18:5-6

Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. Matthew 27:25

Whatever.

You're like an anti-anti-Christ Teddy Ruxpin.

 

[5stringJeff]

Still avoiding my reply, eh Shamgar?

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Still avoiding my reply, eh Shamgar?

Teddy can't hear you. He's not interactive. You need to find some more developed technology.

 

[GotZoom]

I will help your small mind with a little correction. . .I am not "anti-jew" since Christ was a Jew. . .aka Semite. . . so I am not "antisemitic" but I am anti-anti-Christ . . .

“For many deceivers HAVE entered into the world, who do not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh. This is the DECEIVER AND THE ANTICHRIST. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.” 2 John 1:7-9

“Young ones, it is a last hour, and as you heard that the Antichrist is coming, EVEN NOW MANY ANTICHRISTS HAVE RISEN UP, from which you know that it is a last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they were of us, they would have remained with us; but they left so that it might be revealed that they all are not of us.” I John 2:18-19

“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God; and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is THE ANTICHRIST YOU HEARD IS COMING, AND EVEN NOW IS ALREADY IN THE WORLD.” 1 John 4:2-3

“And when Silas and Timothy had come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit and testified to the Jews that Jesus is the Christ. And they resisting and blaspheming, shaking his garment, he said to them, Your blood is on your own heads. I am pure from it . From now on I will go to the nations.” Acts 18:5-6

Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children. Matthew 27:25

Jar Jar Binks, "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace" (George Lucas 1999)

 

[Shamgar]

Whatever.

You're like an anti-anti-Christ Teddy Ruxpin.

Yeah see I guess I still used words/concepts that were too complicated. . . have your handler explain the significance. . . .

His propaganda [Joseph Goebbels] crusades were based on a simple observation: What the masses term truth is that information which is most familiar. As Goebbels put it:
'The rank and file are usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. In the long run only he will achieve basic results in influencing public opinion who is able to reduce problems to the simplest terms and who has the courage to keep forever repeating them in this simplified form despite the objections of the intellectuals.(5)'

Pratkanis, Anthony and Aronson, Elliot.“Age of Propaganda": The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion” (New York: 2001) Page 182.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Yeah see I guess I still used words/concepts that were too complicated. . . have your handler explain the significance. . . .

His propaganda [Joseph Goebbels] crusades were based on a simple observation: What the masses term truth is that information which is most familiar. As Goebbels put it:
'The rank and file are usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. In the long run only he will achieve basic results in influencing public opinion who is able to reduce problems to the simplest terms and who has the courage to keep forever repeating them in this simplified form despite the objections of the intellectuals.(5)'

Pratkanis, Anthony and Aronson, Elliot.“Age of Propaganda": The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion” (New York: 2001) Page 182.

You're running out of material. Better find a new website. Too bad you're not actually interested in any kind of debate. Typical of your type.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

You're running out of material. Better find a new website. Too bad you're not actually interested in any kind of debate. Typical of your type.

You've yet to do anything but personally attack, clay? What is your opinion. Jews are special and we should live by the obvious double standards they dictate for us?

 

[The ClayTaurus]

You've yet to do anything but personally attack, clay? What is your opinion. Jews are special and we should live by the obvious double standards they dictate for us?

Perhaps. But Jeff's provided a detailed to response to your new best friend, and neither of you have so much as blinked at it. Besides, you already know my opinion. It involves you getting off your ass.