Are you born gay?

[dilloduck]

I'm still confused why you would use a word AS an insult, then jeer at people because they take it the way it's meant.

It's like "******"--only certain people can say it without offending people.

 

[glockmail]

It's pretty clear to most of us here that you made a choice not to be gay. That is your right, of course. Was it difficult for you? I imagine it's kind of like quitting smoking...you probably have more infrequent cravings but they pop up at the most unexpected times.

Wow! Say the word "gay' around you and you immediately get defensive. What's up with that? And why would being called "gay' offend you so much?

Here you go- two more examples of libs using "gay", or the insinuation, an an insult. They just can't help themselves.

 

[Ravi]

Here you go- two more examples of libs using "gay", or the insinuation, an an insult. They just can't help themselves.

You see an insult where there is none.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

The Bass is still waiting on proof that people are born homosexual. You're still losing.

 

[dilloduck]

The Bass is still waiting on proof that people are born homosexual. You're still losing.

You gotta have faith, Mr. Bass--you know--the stuff they think is bullshit ?

 

[jillian]

You gotta have faith, Mr. Bass--you know--the stuff they think is bullshit ?

let's see if i have this straight... we're supposed to take it on faith that G-d has spaketh and gays are abberant... but YOU don't require any proof that people CHOOSE to be gay?

Okie dokie... that's pretty sad but whatever.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

let's see if i have this straight... we're supposed to take it on faith that G-d has spaketh and gays are abberant... but YOU don't require any proof that people CHOOSE to be gay?

Okie dokie... that's pretty sad but whatever.

It is gays and their neo-liberal supporters who say they are born that way so the burden of proof is on both gays and their supporters to prove they're born this way, its not on the opposition to disprove anything.

 

[dilloduck]

let's see if i have this straight... we're supposed to take it on faith that G-d has spaketh and gays are abberant... but YOU don't require any proof that people CHOOSE to be gay?

Okie dokie... that's pretty sad but whatever.

wrong---take it on faith that God exists. That apparently is a mental illness but when we are to take someones ( ?) word that people are born gay, with no proof thats NOT mental illness ?

 

[Ravi]

It is gays and their neo-liberal supporters who say they are born that way so the burden of proof is on both gays and their supporters to prove they're born this way, its not on the opposition to disprove anything.

In reality, no one seems to care about the answer to the question besides you and glock, and of course that makes us want to know why you care...which neither of you have answered.

Why do you care?

 

[Shattered]

You didn't direct it at Allie specifically either. But now you're insinuating that I'm gay, proving my point yet again, that liberals always use gay as an insult.

Actually, it's pretty obvious it was directed to Allie...

 

[glockmail]

You see an insult where there is none.

I'll be the judge if I was offended.

 

[AllieBaba]

wrong---take it on faith that God exists. That apparently is a mental illness but when we are to take someones ( ?) word that people are born gay, with no proof thats NOT mental illness ?

Ooh! You deserve more rep for that, but sadly, I can't give it to you.

Nor can I complain about it in our rep complaint thread, because Gunny the all powerful has shut that thread down.

Anyway, the left whines about our faith in God, but they have every bit as much faith as we have invested in Christ invested in their progressive secular mantra.

Gays are born, not made.
Children are sexual beings and should be taught as such.
Christians and Republicans aren't worthy of human rights, and nobody will be hurt if they are taken from them.

Did I miss anything?

 

[dilloduck]

Ooh! You deserve more rep for that, but sadly, I can't give it to you.

Nor can I complain about it in our rep complaint thread, because Gunny the all powerful has shut that thread down.

Anyway, the left whines about our faith in God, but they have every bit as much faith as we have invested in Christ invested in their progressive secular mantra.

Gays are born, not made.
Children are sexual beings and should be taught as such.
Christians and Republicans aren't worthy of human rights, and nobody will be hurt if they are taken from them.

Did I miss anything?

Just the mean and hateful part.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

How em I liar...

You're a liar because you advanced a statement you knew to be false as truth...

Look it up...

 

[Gunny]

How em I liar, like I said do alittle research and not believe everything that is told to you. And by your statement Ryan White deserved to contract AIDS because he should of known not to take a blood from someone who has had homosexaul sex. What a stupid statement and it proves my point that you are stupid.
I hope you get AIDS and die, your sorry excuse for a human being. Your kind should be extermanted.

Actually, you are logically incorrect. Accepting blood from someone known to be homosexual is INDEED increasing the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.

The fact that it has been spread around in the heterosexual community does not negate nor dilute the fact that it originated in the homosexual community, and/or that homosexuals are at a much higher risk of contracting the disease.

If you conscously accepted blood from an intravenous drug user, it would be the same. The risk of contracting HIV/AIDS would be higher.

It's dangerous to let political dogma and political correctness take the place of the facts.

 

[Luissa]

Actually, you are logically incorrect. Accepting blood from someone known to be homosexual is INDEED increasing the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.

The fact that it has been spread around in the heterosexual community does not negate nor dilute the fact that it originated in the homosexual community, and/or that homosexuals are at a much higher risk of contracting the disease.

If you conscously accepted blood from an intravenous drug user, it would be the same. The risk of contracting HIV/AIDS would be higher.

It's dangerous to let political dogma and political correctness take the place of the facts.

Most people who recieve blood tranfusions do not know who there donors are that was my point. And HIV/AIDS did not orginate in the homosexual community. For one, one of the first people to get in the US was a women.
And even it is more common in their group it is no excuse to be unexcepting of them and saying it is gods way of weeding them out. Also who would take a blood transfusion from someone they know has AIDS unless they have a death wish. But hey keep sticking up for the guy.

 

[Care4all]

fyi

1. homosexuals can not donate blood because they are at high risk nor can drug users, or (people that had travel to europe during the mad cow scare.)

and in case they lie when at the blood bank donating, all units of blood are tested for HIV now.


luissa
i'd like to see a link where it shows that a woman was the first person with aids in the usa....i worked in a blood bank when AIDS was first being identified in the early 80's and this is not what was being told to us, in the blood banking, medical, and scientific fields?

 

[Shattered]

fyi

1. homosexuals can not donate blood because they are at high risk nor can drug users, or (people that had travel to europe during the mad cow scare.)

and in case they lie when at the blood bank donating, all units of blood are tested for HIV now.


luissa
i'd like to see a link where it shows that a woman was the first person with aids in the usa....i worked in a blood bank when AIDS was first being identified in the early 80's and this is not what was being told to us, in the blood banking, medical, and scientific fields?

Maybe David, and Robert sound like female names to her.. (Those are the two earliest I come up with)

 

[Care4all]

I have many gay friends. They tell me stories of having affairs with married men. There is a certain bar in this city where married men like to go to meet the men of their true calling. (the love that dare not speak it's name so to say)


A lot of these men have children with their wives, hmmm, so it's straight in public, gay in private I guess.

Wonder if the so called "gay bashers" on here have anything like that to hide?

those men are low lifes with no back bone as far as i am concerned...certainly nothing to look up to.....

surprised your gay friends even want to have anything to do with them honestly

 

[dilloduck]

those men are low lifes with no back bone as far as i am concerned...certainly nothing to look up to.....

surprised your gay friends even want to have anything to do with them honestly

ya Zulu. You're hanging out with adulterers !!!