Are we pushing Russia into a nuclear response?

jwoodie

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
21,810
Reaction score
11,016
Points
1,255
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?
 
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?
We all should believe Putin's clear statement on the use of nuclear weapons. Most important is Putin sayind on behalf of his country's military that it will be all or nothing.

At the present Russia is still responding with much greater effect on the Ukraine, than what Russia suffers.

The greatest danger of nuclear war is in the building conflict between the Zionist regime and Iran and it's proxies. It's being claimed that Iran has armed the Houthis with the highest state of art hypersonic weapons that are a real threat to US aircraft carriers. I would be more worried about that touching off the nuclear spark!
 
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?


They don't just have nukes, they have the most nukes. Unlike America they also aren't restrained by a No First Use doctrine.

Now, whether they would risk all of Russia by using them is anyones guess.
 
By watching them go broke and lose or tie a war with a much smaller country?
 
This was BlackRock CIA MIC DARPA WEF's Last Gasp Ukrainian Battle of the Bulge Kursk Kamikaze Mission.

It failed

Putin didn't go nuclear, the Bad Guys didn't take out ZNPP

Make peace, you fools!
 
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?
NO
 
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?
China has instructed Putin not to use nukes.
So the cost to Putin of using nukes would exceed any benefit.
 


I dont waist my time with videos. I was not disputing what agreements China has with Russia.

What can not disputed is we do not know what will happen in the future.

That said I am not worried that Russia might use nukes. I am just saying it is always a possibility. I think it is guaranteed that sometime in the future a country will use nukes hence we need to treat all conflicts with a nuclear power with that possibility in mind. It is just smart firiegn policy.
 
What is it that I said that caused so many Americans to rush into defensive posturing and reassuring each other of their invincibility?

This?

The greatest danger of nuclear war is in the building conflict between the Zionist regime and Iran and it's proxies. It's being claimed that Iran has armed the Houthis with the highest state of art hypersonic weapons that are a real threat to US aircraft carriers. I would be more worried about that touching off the nuclear spark!

The balance of power in the ME has changed hands and the Zionist regime is no longer permitted to wage genocidal wars against those they choose to make their enemies. America is now forced to police their behaviour on account of Iran being capable of wiping the earth clean of the Zionist evil.
 
The worst things that can happen in that war are two.

1. NATO and Ukraine gain the upper hand and invade Russia. This is by far THE WORST.

2. Kamala is elected POTUS. She's part of the machine. My money says Trump will be instrumental in ending that war. And that will mean Ukraine MUST NOT JOIN NATO.
 
Last edited:
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?
Russia just has to quit invading Ukraine. Duh.
 
I am very concerned about the Ukraine/NATO attacks inside Russia. Like it or not, Russia has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them if it perceives a threat to its existence. It seems like a cease-fire agreement would be the best way to avoid further escalation, but we seem bent on destabilizing Russia as punishment for its transgressions. How did that work out for Germany after WW1? Is another Armageddon in Europe's future?

I can't help but notice the number of Trump Cult Russian apologists who awarded you points for your fear mongering.

The first time Putin tries to use a nuclear weapon on foreign soil, mushroom will sprout over every city in Russia within hours, and the nation will cease to exist. France, Great Britain, and the USA all have nuclear arsenals, and Putin doesn't have enough resources to stop it from happening.

You need to go back and read why Germany turned to Hitler after WWI. Germany was punished economically AFTER they surrendered. No one is "punishing" Russia with reparations and economic ruin if Putin is gone and their agression ceases, but Putin has stated for years that his goal is to "restore the Russian empire".

Also note that like Hitler, when Putin wasn't stopped from invading the Crimea, he almost immediately turned to the Donesk Region of the Ukraine, and when that didn't work, he launched an all-out assault thinking an entertainer like Zelensky wouldn't be able to fight back, and NATO had been too weakened by Trump, to help.

Putin is already talking about going after Poland next. He's been in power for 20 years now, and he's not getting any younger. That Empire isn't going to build itself.
 
I can't help but notice the number of Trump Cult Russian apologists who awarded you points for your fear mongering.
I stopped reading after your first sentence. You're twisted lady, and not very bright.
 
Back
Top Bottom