Are we ok with vendetta government?

So that's a "yes"?!?!

Yep. It's a pretty fucked up cycle. Rinse, wash, repeat. Why do you want to perpetuate it?
So you live life letting people shit on you without you doing anything. Interesting thing there.
 
When Doolittle's raiders bombed Tokyo shortly after the Pearl Harbor bombing, were we emulating the Japanese?

What should we have done instead?
he thinks nothing should be done, let bullies take you over and control you. he's a demofk. He didn't use to be, but he turned into one.
 
he thinks nothing should be done, let bullies take you over and control you. he's a demofk. He didn't use to be, but he turned into one.
Fuck you. Don't pretend you know what I think. Don't pretend you're intelligent to understand my posts. Crawl back under your rock and resume fondling Trump's scrotum. He digs that.
 
I can't find the Elon slap in the face of doge quote
could you point me to it ?

Well he said he was "disappointed" and felt Trump's bill underminded him. What does undermind mean?

the act of weakening or destroying something (as a verb). In its verbal form, it means to gradually or secretly weaken something, often by undermining its foundations or support, or by eroding its strength or confidence. For example, "undermind" can describe someone trying to sabotage another person's reputation or efforts, or how a persistent lack of confidence can "undermind" someone's ability to succeed.
A synonym for "slapped in the face" as an expression (meaning insulted or rebuffed) could be insulted, humiliated, or snubbed

Elon Musk says he is "disappointed" by the price tag of the domestic policy bill passed by Republicans in the House last week and heavily backed by President Trump. The billionaire who recently stepped back from running the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, made the remark during an exclusive broadcast interview with "CBS Sunday Morning."

"I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk said.

Musk's comments appear to put him at odds with Mr. Trump, who has championed the massive spending package. The legislation — which still needs to pass the Senate — would extend Mr. Trump's signature 2017 tax cuts, boost border security spending, impose work requirements on Medicaid and roll back clean energy tax credits.

The tax provisions of the package, titled the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" after Mr. Trump's name for the bill, would increase the deficit by $3.8 trillion by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
 
No. I want you to realize that childish, destructive retaliation does no good. It might give you your vengeance high, but it leaves the nation in a worse place.

I'm not so worried about the tit-for-tat prosecutions. As long as there's evidence of a real crime, go for it. But SOOO much of the MAGA mindset is insane paranoid fantasy. And that leads them to support anything that dings leftists, regardless of its legality, regardless of the precedent it sets.

Those precedents will come back to haunt you - all of us.
You just agreed with what I said, while saying you don't.
 
This nation has no hope of survival. At this point I am ready for emperor Trump.

Don't be fooled by the noise from the left. They are losing on all fronts.

If we can win teh mid terms and get... even the most mitigated success on policy, and the dems remain as retarded as they have been,


this could be the beginning of a generations long period of MAGA dominance.
 
The violent imagery is all on the partisan culture warriors themselves. Their persistent premise is that they are at war. Every election is treated that way. They're not interested in electing a good leaders. They want someone who will inflict maximum damage on the "other side". And it's not just a metaphor.
So, do you want to keep up with the violent imagery or not? Again, you brought it up.
If the cost is validating their lawfare by mimicking it, if the cost is eroding fundamental Constitutional protections like due process and habeas corpus, if the cost is descending deeper and deeper into fascist fearmongering and scapegoating - we'll all pay the cost.
All the costs start when Republicans do lawfare, not the last eight years of Democratic Party lawfare?

What should Trump and Trumpers* do about the lawfare of the last 8 years?

*who are a majority of the voters, not some fringe cult.
 
Last edited:
Don't be fooled by the noise from the left. They are losing on all fronts.

If we can win teh mid terms and get... even the most mitigated success on policy, and the dems remain as retarded as they have been,


this could be the beginning of a generations long period of MAGA dominance.
Provided the degenerate democrats don't rig the elections.
 
You assume wrong.

Regardless, we're not talking about warfare. We're talking about politics. At a certain level, we're all on the same side. Otherwise, what's the point?

That's the thing, SO many partisans are SO steeped in the "us vs them" mentality that they actually see the other party as a greater threat to our nation then our avowed foreign enemies. That's fucked up.
So when the other party tries to pass a law saying it's OK for boys to play on girls teams, we're supposed to say "Yeah, that's a great idea, Kumbaya!"
 
Well he said he was "disappointed" and felt Trump's bill underminded him. What does undermind mean?

the act of weakening or destroying something (as a verb). In its verbal form, it means to gradually or secretly weaken something, often by undermining its foundations or support, or by eroding its strength or confidence. For example, "undermind" can describe someone trying to sabotage another person's reputation or efforts, or how a persistent lack of confidence can "undermind" someone's ability to succeed.
A synonym for "slapped in the face" as an expression (meaning insulted or rebuffed) could be insulted, humiliated, or snubbed

Elon Musk says he is "disappointed" by the price tag of the domestic policy bill passed by Republicans in the House last week and heavily backed by President Trump. The billionaire who recently stepped back from running the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, made the remark during an exclusive broadcast interview with "CBS Sunday Morning."

"I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk said.

Musk's comments appear to put him at odds with Mr. Trump, who has championed the massive spending package. The legislation — which still needs to pass the Senate — would extend Mr. Trump's signature 2017 tax cuts, boost border security spending, impose work requirements on Medicaid and roll back clean energy tax credits.

The tax provisions of the package, titled the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" after Mr. Trump's name for the bill, would increase the deficit by $3.8 trillion by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Your concern over Musk's FeeFees is touching
 
So, do you want to keep up with the violent imagery or not? Again, you brought it up.
I'm not sure what're you're getting at here. My biggest beef with partisans is that they insist on treating politics like warfare. They inject the violent imagery. Because they want violent government.
Now, what should Trump and Trumpers* do about the lawfare of the last 8 years?
Prosecute the lawbreakers. But let's be honest, that's not good enough, right? MAGA wants a progrom.
No. It's not cool at all. I'll say it again, since you're so eager to dismiss it:

"If the cost is validating their lawfare by mimicking it, if the cost is eroding fundamental Constitutional protections like due process and habeas corpus, if the cost is descending deeper and deeper into fascist fearmongering and scapegoating - we'll all pay the cost."
Now, what should Trump and Trumpers* do about the lawfare of the last 8 years?
Prosecute the lawbreakers. But let's be honest, that's not good enough, right? MAGA wants a pogrom.
*who are a majority of the voters, not some fringe cult.
Yeah. That's the problem alright. And it's worse than that because Democrats mostly agree. They've been spinning the "victimhood" line for far longer than Republicans. We now have a nation of voters convinced that only authoritarian government can save them.
 
So when the other party tries to pass a law saying it's OK for boys to play on girls teams, we're supposed to say "Yeah, that's a great idea, Kumbaya!"
No. You vote against it. And if they pass it, you work to repeal it. Isn't that obvious?
 
The violent imagery is all on the partisan culture warriors themselves. Their persistent premise is that they are at war. Every election is treated that way. They're not interested in electing a good leaders. They want someone who will inflict maximum damage on the "other side". And it's not just a metaphor.

If the cost is validating their lawfare by mimicking it, if the cost is eroding fundamental Constitutional protections like due process and habeas corpus, if the cost is descending deeper and deeper into fascist fearmongering and scapegoating - we'll all pay the cost.
You keep claiming that and I asked you for examples of Trump doing it and nothing from you. One person linked to a Wikipedia page claiming that as evidence.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom