Are we more likely to be killed by an illegal/anchor baby or an AR-15?

[BrokeLoser]

Since Democrats seem to be super concerned about AR-15’s I can’t help but wonder why they wouldn’t be concerned about growing a murderous population among us?
Have Mexicrats even considered this?
Do they realize why nobody sane can take them serious?

 

[DGS49]

If you want to make a point, you ought to avoid looking like an idiot in your headline. An Anchor Baby is, by definition, a U.S. citizen (i.e., "legal"). There is no such thing as an "illegal/anchor baby."

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

More concerned about getting killed by a drunk-driving redneck...certainly the odds are greater.

 

[BrokeLoser]

If you want to make a point, you ought to avoid looking like an idiot in your headline. An Anchor Baby is, by definition, a U.S. citizen (i.e., "legal"). There is no such thing as an "illegal/anchor baby."

Sane people working with an iQ know that a foward slash placed between two words replaces the word ‘or’. You OldLady and EvilEyeFleegle all need to pull your heads from your asses. Further, while anchor babies may be a US Citizens...they are citizens by way of federal criminality and illegal means.
If elected politicians were doing their ******* jobs neither the illegal or the anchor baby would be here killing Americans. Get it now Gustavo? See the point?

 

[BrokeLoser]

More concerned about getting killed by a drunk-driving redneck...certainly the odds are greater.

That may be true in Potato Land...you have lots of filthy white trash...Wetbacks hate cold climates. Consider yourself lucky.