Are we clear on this yet?

[berg80]

Conspiracy charges, by their very nature, include communication. But on the second page of the federal indictment, in the third enumerated paragraph, the prosecution attempts to make clear that Trump is not being prosecuted for his repeated lies about a stolen election. He is being prosecuted for the efforts he made and the actions he took to operationalize his desire to overturn the election.

Jack Smith’s Trump indictment goes where free speech ends and criminal conspiracy begins

Before Monday’s additional state indictment in Georgia, former President Trump stood accused in federal court of criminal conspiracy to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. Co…

thehill.com

It seems many Trumpletons continue to be hoodwinked in to thinking the crimes Don committed are protected by the 1st A. Why? Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

Allow me to disabuse all of you harboring this false narrative by suggesting you read Jack Smith's indictment of Trump. It explicitly recognizes Individual 1's right to express his opinion about the election's integrity. Then it goes on to explain the crimes Eric's dad committed.

You remember Eric. He's one of the folks included in the ruling by a NY judge that the Trump Org. was essentially built on a mountain of fraudulent financial misrepresentations.

 

[elektra]

Jack Smith is a hack lawyer politician

The linked to article does not contain any substantial information.

The article states that Trump's speech is not protected free speech.

Stupid men writing articles regurgitating the same democrat party talking points.

Trump has no freedom of speech and hence they are prosecuting Trump for calling the election a fraud.

Idiots

 

[BULLDOG]

Jack Smith is a hack lawyer politician

The linked to article does not contain any substantial information.

The article states that Trump's speech is not protected free speech.

Stupid men writing articles regurgitating the same democrat party talking points.

Trump has no freedom of speech and hence they are prosecuting Trump for calling the election a fraud.

Idiots

You're wrong about the reason, but can't we all agree that him finally facing responsibility for his underhanded unethical ways is a good thing?

 

[Independent thinker]

Conspiracy charges, by their very nature, include communication. But on the second page of the federal indictment, in the third enumerated paragraph, the prosecution attempts to make clear that Trump is not being prosecuted for his repeated lies about a stolen election. He is being prosecuted for the efforts he made and the actions he took to operationalize his desire to overturn the election.

Jack Smith’s Trump indictment goes where free speech ends and criminal conspiracy begins

Before Monday’s additional state indictment in Georgia, former President Trump stood accused in federal court of criminal conspiracy to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. Co…

thehill.com

It seems many Trumpletons continue to be hoodwinked in to thinking the crimes Don committed are protected by the 1st A. Why? Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

Allow me to disabuse all of you harboring this false narrative by suggesting you read Jack Smith's indictment of Trump. It explicitly recognizes Individual 1's right to express his opinion about the election's integrity. Then it goes on to explain the crimes Eric's dad committed.

You remember Eric. He's one of the folks included in the ruling by a NY judge that the Trump Org. was essentially built on a mountain of fraudulent financial misrepresentations.

Democrats spent years trying to overturn the 2016 election. I don't see any of them indicted for it.

 

[elektra]

You're wrong about the reason, but can't we all agree that him finally facing responsibility for his underhanded unethical ways is a good thing?

what reason, then?

 

[SeaMajor7]

The Stalinist Struggle is REAL

 

[1srelluc]

Damn OP, I did not think you could possibly get anymore boring but you outdid yourself.

 

[BlindBoo]

Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

They can't wrap the minds around the fact that their media, Faux "Not" News has deliberately lied to them for money. That fact doesn't seem to matter to them. Why would the truth about President Biden's victory in 2020, or Ex-President Trumps efforts to overturn several democratic elections in the country matter?

 

[martybegan]

Conspiracy charges, by their very nature, include communication. But on the second page of the federal indictment, in the third enumerated paragraph, the prosecution attempts to make clear that Trump is not being prosecuted for his repeated lies about a stolen election. He is being prosecuted for the efforts he made and the actions he took to operationalize his desire to overturn the election.

Jack Smith’s Trump indictment goes where free speech ends and criminal conspiracy begins

Before Monday’s additional state indictment in Georgia, former President Trump stood accused in federal court of criminal conspiracy to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. Co…

thehill.com

It seems many Trumpletons continue to be hoodwinked in to thinking the crimes Don committed are protected by the 1st A. Why? Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

Allow me to disabuse all of you harboring this false narrative by suggesting you read Jack Smith's indictment of Trump. It explicitly recognizes Individual 1's right to express his opinion about the election's integrity. Then it goes on to explain the crimes Eric's dad committed.

You remember Eric. He's one of the folks included in the ruling by a NY judge that the Trump Org. was essentially built on a mountain of fraudulent financial misrepresentations.

Repeating the same bullshit just piles it up higher.

Conspiracy charges in this case are just elmer's glue to hold weak bullshit individual cases together.

 

[Lesh]

If John Gotti held a meeting in which he told his lieutenants to murder rivals… all he had done was use words.

Is that protected speech?

Or is that conspiracy?

 

[berg80]

Jack Smith is a hack lawyer politician

The linked to article does not contain any substantial information.

The article states that Trump's speech is not protected free speech.

Stupid men writing articles regurgitating the same democrat party talking points.

Trump has no freedom of speech and hence they are prosecuting Trump for calling the election a fraud.

All lies.

 

[berg80]

Repeating the same bullshit just piles it up higher.

Conspiracy charges in this case are just elmer's glue to hold weak bullshit individual cases together.

I'm sorry you feel that way. But whining doesn't make for a cogent argument. Let me know when you have one.

 

[DGS49]

Why is it a "lie" when Trump points out that the 2020 election was stolen, while HRC's claims that the 2016 election was stolen are treated as fair commentary?

You fucking moron.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Conspiracy charges, by their very nature, include communication. But on the second page of the federal indictment, in the third enumerated paragraph, the prosecution attempts to make clear that Trump is not being prosecuted for his repeated lies about a stolen election. He is being prosecuted for the efforts he made and the actions he took to operationalize his desire to overturn the election.

Jack Smith’s Trump indictment goes where free speech ends and criminal conspiracy begins

Before Monday’s additional state indictment in Georgia, former President Trump stood accused in federal court of criminal conspiracy to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. Co…

thehill.com

It seems many Trumpletons continue to be hoodwinked in to thinking the crimes Don committed are protected by the 1st A. Why? Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

Allow me to disabuse all of you harboring this false narrative by suggesting you read Jack Smith's indictment of Trump. It explicitly recognizes Individual 1's right to express his opinion about the election's integrity. Then it goes on to explain the crimes Eric's dad committed.

You remember Eric. He's one of the folks included in the ruling by a NY judge that the Trump Org. was essentially built on a mountain of fraudulent financial misrepresentations.

OP really, really REALLY want this to be true, so he writes it in all caps, underlines it, and color codes it.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Jack Smith is a hack lawyer politician

The linked to article does not contain any substantial information.

The article states that Trump's speech is not protected free speech.

Stupid men writing articles regurgitating the same democrat party talking points.

Trump has no freedom of speech and hence they are prosecuting Trump for calling the election a fraud.

Idiots

It is worse. Jack Smith has become wealth feeding from the public trough. This raises the issue of possible corruption. He is not even a legislator (though legislators using public office to enrich themselves is bad in itself). He was a DOJ employee.

 

[berg80]

OP really, really REALLY want this to be true, so he writes it in all caps, underlines it, and color codes it.

It is my habit to highlight that which Trumpletons are most likely to ignore.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Conspiracy charges, by their very nature, include communication. But on the second page of the federal indictment, in the third enumerated paragraph, the prosecution attempts to make clear that Trump is not being prosecuted for his repeated lies about a stolen election. He is being prosecuted for the efforts he made and the actions he took to operationalize his desire to overturn the election.

Jack Smith’s Trump indictment goes where free speech ends and criminal conspiracy begins

Before Monday’s additional state indictment in Georgia, former President Trump stood accused in federal court of criminal conspiracy to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. Co…

thehill.com

It seems many Trumpletons continue to be hoodwinked in to thinking the crimes Don committed are protected by the 1st A. Why? Because there has been a relentless misinformation campaign to that end launched by the Orange Fraud himself and his right wing media enablers.

Allow me to disabuse all of you harboring this false narrative by suggesting you read Jack Smith's indictment of Trump. It explicitly recognizes Individual 1's right to express his opinion about the election's integrity. Then it goes on to explain the crimes Eric's dad committed.

You remember Eric. He's one of the folks included in the ruling by a NY judge that the Trump Org. was essentially built on a mountain of fraudulent financial misrepresentations.

Nothing worse that being indicted for bullshit by a bullshit artist with a losing record trying to make a name for himself

 

[berg80]

It is worse. Jack Smith has become wealth feeding from the public trough.

Another baseless conspiracy theory. Really!

 

[berg80]

Nothing worse that being indicted for bullshit by a bullshit artist with a losing record trying to make a name for himself

IOW, you have nothing.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It is my habit to highlight that which Trumpletons are most likely to ignore.

You can highlight whatever you want. You can howl at the sky or stomp your feet.
Most of us will continue to ignore the tds witchhunts