The Bass said nothing about all whites, just that a group and or groups of whites are responsible for the causes that led to the conditions black people live/lived in this country.
find the word SOME in your quote, dude. A GROUP? my ass. Now you are on full grade damage control. No shit SOME white people in the past were responsible for slavery. Welcome to the fucking world history class. Wanna know something else? if ONLY it were white people taking slaves then it would be well and good to lump us all together.. BUT THATS NOT THE HISTORIC FACT, no is it?
given the return application of your racist personal attacks against the Bass you are SORELY mistaken you dumb ignorant troll.
Hey, you can get what you give, pussy. If you want to be a complete racist piece of shit I have no problem sending it back your way and letting you know that white people aren't immune to racist bullshit thrown their way. Indeed, until you show me one black motherfucker that had anything to do with the creation of this nation within it's first 50 fucking years you'll have to excuse me for laughing at your suggestion that IM the ignorant one.
A significant portion of the things we call "American" are the creations of black people and this country would not have been built if not for black people. You can personally attack and insult all you like but there's no getting around cold hard facts. This is why the Bass is so damn good, maybe too good and why you are so below the Bass, the Bass deals with facts.
Name them, motherfucker. PEANUT BUTTER didn't create the USA. I give credit where credit is due.. but im not about to pretend that fucking blues music allows this nation to continue. Indeed, NAME those "cold hard facts" cocksucker. I DARE you. Lets see what your ghetto fucking education taught you. And yes, nations do not hinge on black skin in order to be built. Slaves can be any color, as history tells us. Acting like you had a hand in fending of the Brits is a total fucking farce.
Please, by all means.. POST THESE COLD HARD FACTS, mr "im so good (at being stupid as hell)"
"In 1770, Crispus Attucks, a black man, became the first casualty of the American Revolution when he was shot and killed in what became known as the Boston Massacre."
Africans in America/Part 2/Crispus Attucks
WOW!
a black man took a fucking bullet!?!?!?! Holy SHIT! Clearly, we need a black stripe to our flag!
The American Revolution started with a black man.
:LOL:
this is the kind of goofy shit im talking about. So a black man was shot ALL IF A SUDDEN the colonist decided to revolt!?
No, dude.. the AMERICAN REVOLUTION began with unfair taxes. Your little posterboy was a creation given to you in order to let your demographic feel like it had a hand in the creation of America.
If taking a bullet is all it takes to become a fucking martyr then south central LA must be the new holy land.
The Bass is an American, even more American than your pasty white butt. The Bass' maternal grandmother is a Native American woman of Creek and Seminole ancestry, but don't get it twisted, the Bass is black. Black Americans are well over 400 years removed from Africa so why all the go back to Africa talk moron? And what ownership do you have to this country to tell a Black American to go back to Africa? You're just trolling abd babbling at the mouth with angry personal attacks out of desperation. The truth causes people to act in an uncomely manner, so its understandable why you're acting this way.
Think so? Again, show me how many dark skinned negros were writing up, or having the slightest fucking input on, our Constitution until the 1960.. PLEASE, be specific. Give me a NAME.
You think no one else has native in their blood, ya fucking idiot? I have records on my native blood too, dipshit. WOW. so much for your little SPADE in the hole, eh?
what ownership? fortunately for you we rely on democracy despite race, AS THE PREVIOUS EVIDENCE OF DISMISSING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ABOVE WILL NOTE, and i'm perfectly fine with that. But your goofy little nubian jungle king fantasy is just that: a fantasy. AND, if you don't like racist policies like AA being scrapped then, again, take your ass back to your utopian homeland where you cry about being snatched from.
Lol:
or, hey, do some more damage control of your posts and make me laugh on an entirely new layer of humor in this thread!
What do you think white privilege is? Its all of the things you just mentioned stupid, it just isn't written in law.
Ahhh... blaming the boogyman since the FACT of racial equality scares the dark right out of you. White privilage doesn't apply in a society that remains equally applied. You will see whatever discrepencies you WANT to se despite the variables involved. Wanna blame whites for black prison populations? SUUUUURE! white privilage DESPITE every ghetto thug wannabe out there robbing a fucking liquer store because him mom is a crack whore and his dad is a total mystery. Wanna blame whites for shitty college applications? SUUUUURE, nevermind the laughable joke that is your insistence that the Rev War was caused by a brit shooting a black man.
Again, you cannot end racism by BEING a racist. If you can hate whitey then guess what will come back atcha. AA is just that: a racist policy. AND, since im the only one posting evidence besides crying like a whipped slave over shit that is largely in your fucking head....
Affirmative action isn't so called "reverse racism"[an oxymoronic baseless term in itself because racism and discrimination is just what it racism and discrimination, there's no reverse to it, lol at the terms angry white backlashed men come up with] and affirmative isn't the reverse of the same things blacks suffered. Hrre's some additional reading material to educate your mind simple fellow:
Indeed, blacks are just as capable of racism as anyone else. I realize that you think you are impervious to racism but, hey, equality is a bitch, eh? Yes, racism CAN, and IS, applied to whites by non whites. AA is a direct example of this. I don't really care if you comprehend this or not given your laughable take on the revolutionary war. If you can fathom a white kid DISCRIMINATED because of his skin color then you are no better than any standing member of the klan. It's "reverse" insomuch that it's application is the DIRECT result of efforts to amend racist state practices. I realize that, statistically, you didn't go to college so..
Teaching Reverse Racism
Teaching Reverse Racism - TIME
Reverse Discrimination
Reverse Discrimination - TIME
Reverse discrimination
Reverse discrimination - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Reverse" Discrimination Landmark Cases
1. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., 427 U.S. 273, 96 S.Ct. 2574 (1976). Two White employees and one Black employee were charged with stealing property from their employer. The two White employees were fired while the Black employee was retained. In the first big reverse discrimination case, the Court decided that Title VII is not limited to discrimination against minority persons, but includes discriminatory actions against majority persons as well.
2. Middletown v. City of Flint, 92 F.3d 396. (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied 117 S.Ct. 1552 (1997). Challenge by White police officers passed over for promotions because of voluntary affirmative action plan involving a 50% set aside of promotions to Sergeant for racial minorities. Court found plan to be an "unnecessarily drastic remedy."
3. Police Association of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159 (5th Cir. 1996). City's race conscious promotions violated Equal Protection Clause because they were not narrowly tailored.
4. Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1033 (1996). Strikes down the race-conscious admissions program of the University of Texas Law School. The school used lower minimum criteria for African American and Mexican American candidates than for other candidates. The Court held that obtaining a racially diverse student body is not a compelling interest under the 14th Amendment.
5. Harding v. Gray, 9 F.3d 150 (D.C. Cir. 1993). D.C. Circuit interpreted McDonnell Douglas (described in our "Civil Rights Cases" category in list at left) to require an additional showing for White plaintiffs in reverse discrimination cases over and above what would be required by minority plaintiffs. The court held that, because racial discrimination against White persons is so rare, in order to establish the necessary inference of discrimination, White plaintiffs must prove "background circumstances" that "support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority." This can be done by showing that plaintiff was better qualified than the minority applicant whom the employer selected.
6. Lucas v. Dole, 835 F.2d 532 (4th cir. 1987). The Fourth Circuit refused to adopt the D.C. Circuit's "background circumstances" requirement and instead applied McDonnell Douglas test in the same way to White and Black plaintiff. White plaintiff satisfied her burden in this case where she showed that she was more qualified than the selected minority applicant, that the interviewing process was too subjective, that the minority applicant had received irregular acts of favoritism, and that other employees believed that race was a factor.
7. Schafer v. Board of Public Education, 903 F.2d 243 (3d Cir. 1990). Reverse sexual discrimination case. The court held that male teacher stated a claim for discrimination where he was not allowed to take a year of paternity leave, while female teachers were allowed to take similar amount of maternity leave. Distinctions between men and women can be made with respect to physical disabilities related to pregnancy or the delivery of a child, but not with respect to child rearing.
"Reverse" Discrimination Landmark Cases
Wrong simpleton, states started to secede because Northerners did not and attempted to block the expansion of slavery into the new territories. Lincoln was perfectly satisfied with slavery being continued in those states that were already slave states, but he opposed expansion of slavery into newly acquired territory. :
Civil War - MSN Encarta
quote where I have stated that the civil war was the product of the expansion of slavery, idiot.
In the days of the American Revolution and of the adoption of the Constitution, differences between North and South were dwarfed by their common interest in establishing a new nation. But sectionalism steadily grew stronger.
During the 19th century the South remained almost completely agricultural, with an economy and a social order largely founded on slavery and the plantation system. These mutually dependent institutions produced the staples, especially cotton, from which the South derived its wealth. The North had its own great agricultural resources, was always more advanced commercially, and was also expanding industrially.
Hostility between the two sections grew perceptibly after 1820, the year of the Missouri Compromise, which was intended as a permanent solution to the issue in which that hostility was most clearly expressed—
the question of the extension or prohibition of slavery in the federal territories of the West. Difficulties over the tariff (which led John C. Calhoun and South Carolina to nullification and to an extreme states' rights stand) and troubles over internal improvements were also involved, but the territorial issue nearly always loomed largest. In the North moral indignation increased with the rise of the abolitionists in the 1830s. Since slavery was unadaptable to much of the territorial lands, which eventually would be admitted as free states, the South became more anxious about maintaining its position as an equal in the Union. Southerners thus strongly supported the annexation of Texas (certain to be a slave state) and the Mexican War and even agitated for the annexation of Cuba.
Causes of the Civil War
Lincoln began his public career by claiming that he was "antislavery" -- against slavery's expansion but not calling for immediate emancipation. However, the man who began as "antislavery" eventually issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves in those states that were in rebellion.
He vigorously supported the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery throughout the United States, and, in the last speech of his life, he recommended extending the vote to African Americans.
Lincoln on Slavery
| "...the institution of slavery is founded upon both injustice and bad policy..." March 3, 1837 |
| "That sight was a continual torment to me..." August 24, 1855 |
| "...If A. can prove...that he may, of right enslave B. -- why may not B..." July 1, 1854 |
| "...I have no prejudice against the Southern people..." October 16, 1854 |
| "I have always hated slavery..." July 10, 1858 |
| "As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master..." August 1, 1858 |
| "...eradicating the light of reason and the love of liberty..." October 7, 1858 |
| "...our fathers did not make this nation half slave and half free..." October 13, 1858 |
| "...I combat it has having an evil tendency..." October 15, 1858 |
| "It is the eternal struggle between these two principles -- right and wrong..." October 15, 1858 |
| "I believe the declara[tion] that all men are created equal' is the great fundamental principle..." October 18, 1858 |
| "I do not wish to be misunderstood upon this subject of slavery..." March 1, 1859 |
| "Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves..." April 6, 1859 |
| "I think Slavery is wrong, morally, and politically..." September 17, 1859 |
| "Free labor has the inspiration of hope; pure slavery has no hope..." September 17, 1859 |
| "...I am inflexible." February 1, 1861 |
| Lincoln's Last Public Address April 11, 1865 |
Lincoln on Slavery
Causes of the Civil War
The chief and immediate cause of the war was slavery. Southern states, including the 11 states that formed the Confederacy, depended on slavery to support their economy. Southerners used slave labor to produce crops, especially cotton. Although slavery was illegal in the Northern states, only a small proportion of Northerners actively opposed it. The main debate between the North and the South on the eve of the war was whether slavery should be permitted in the Western territories recently acquired during the Mexican War (1846-1848), including New Mexico, part of California, and Utah. Opponents of slavery were concerned about its expansion, in part because they did not want to compete against slave labor.
The Avalon Project : First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln
First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln
MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1861
You have CLEARLY never heard of the Missouri Compromise.
Missouri Compromise - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Which, I must say.. doesn't shock me at all.
And, if you want Lincoln quotes then scroll up. It's awfully pathetic of you, a black man, to discount the man who wrote the fucking Emancipation Proclimation.
The Emancipation Proclamation consists of two executive orders issued by United States President Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War. The first one, issued September 22, 1862, declared the freedom of all slaves in any state of the Confederate States of America that did not return to Union control by January 1, 1863. The second order, issued January 1, 1863, named the specific states where it applied.
The Emancipation Proclamation was widely attacked at the time as freeing only the slaves over which the Union had no power. In practice, it committed the Union to ending slavery, which was a controversial decision in the North. Lincoln issued the Executive Order by his authority as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy" under Article II, section 2 of the United States Constitution.
Emancipation Proclamation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Booker T. Washington, as a boy of 9, remembered the day in early 1865:[7]
“ As the great day drew nearer, there was more singing in the slave quarters than usual. It was bolder, had more ring, and lasted later into the night. Most of the verses of the plantation songs had some reference to freedom.... Some man who seemed to be a stranger (a United States officer, I presume) made a little speech and then read a rather long paper—the Emancipation Proclamation, I think. After the reading we were told that we were all free, and could go when and where we pleased. My mother, who was standing by my side, leaned over and kissed her children, while tears of joy ran down her cheeks. She explained to us what it all meant, that this was the day for which she had been so long praying, but fearing that she would never live to see.
Emancipation Proclamation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
....I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.......There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from service or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions:
No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.[/b)
It is scarcely questioned that this provision was intended by those who made it for the reclaiming of what we call fugitive slaves; and the intention of the lawgiver is the law. All members of Congress swear their support to the whole Constitution--to this provision as much as to any other. To the proposition, then, that slaves whose cases come within the terms of this clause "shall be delivered up" their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they would make the effort in good temper, could they not with nearly equal unanimity frame and pass a law by means of which to keep good that unanimous oath?
Again, if you want to see Lincoln quotes then scroll up. Pretending that an INAUGURATION speech means anything is a laughing fucking farce. Hell, how much shit did BUSH promise during HIS speech? Clinton? Reagan? Indeed, your narrow perspective pretty much illustrates why it's not white people keeping you out of college rather than your own wildfire ignorance.
Shogun is seriously retarded and can't even discern data in an intelligent manner so the Bass will repeat it.
1) Whites normally tend to be evenly divided between being Democrats and Republicans when the two face off, and or even when white Democrats and white Republicans face off against people within their own parties. Regardless, unless there's a landslide advantage, whites tend to be even divided when facing each other.
Hey, I posted the election results of the last election. Feel free to post ELECTION results by race and see how stupid your assumptions are. 77% of the population trumps your pathetic fucking 15%. THATS the fact. Black votes mean two things: jack and shit. Otherwise, the dems wouldnt need to court your democraphic ALONE in order to fend of republicans and we would not have seen two bush terms.
Again, PLEASE post your evidence. If it's as hilarious as your grasp on the Civil War I look forward to it.
2) Therefore votes from non-white minorities, off which African Americans are one, can be and or are the deciding factor that tips the balance to either side in the same manner of a tiebreaker. Therefore minorities are capable of welding considrable voting power even though numerically their numbers aren't as large as the majority white population.
LOLOLLOLOLOL<OLO<LOL!
Oh this shit never gets old.
Like I said.. POST your evidence of the big bad minority vote, stupid. I'll take hard numbers instead of your nubian fantasy.
Now thats what the Bass was basically saying the first time around only this time the Bass had to dumb it down for you understand it since your mind seems to only function in a rudimenatry fashion.
hey, ONCE AGAIN, feel free to post the actual post-election demographics. There is not a single election that has EVER been decided due to a split white vote that was called by the input of blacks. NEVER. If you can name a sinlge fucking federal election then do it.
and, while you are at it, give me the name of the black dude that had anything to do with the forming of the Constitution! Peanut Butter and taking a bullet is HARDLY impressive!
you've just had your black ass handed to you by a white guy. Feel free to play the race card. Or, use the standard drive by shooting method.. whatever you think you have a firmer grasp on!
