Are Plots From One Country To Assassinate Another Country's Leaders An Act Of War?

Are Plots From One Country To Assassinate Another Country's Leaders An Act Of War?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe, depends on the circumstances

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.

Independent thinker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
38,134
Reaction score
34,769
Points
2,788
I would think they are. If another country had credible plots to assassinate a president of the United States, isn't that something requiring a response from the United States? Case in point, as recently has 2024 Iran had credible plots to assassinate Donald Trump. This was well known and the Biden administration even briefed Trump on it.

But, what did Biden do about it? I haven't even heard that the Biden administration was firm with Iran about it at all, not even publicly stating that the assassination of a political candidate in the US by Iran was a "red line", which would be condemned "in the strongest possible terms" LOL.

Shouldn't the US have laid the law down to Iran back then and declared it an act of war for Iran to be plotting the assassination of a political candidate in the US?

 
I would think they are. If another country had credible plots to assassinate a president of the United States, isn't that something requiring a response from the United States? Case in point, as recently has 2024 Iran had credible plots to assassinate Donald Trump. This was well known and the Biden administration even briefed Trump on it.

But, what did Biden do about it? I haven't even heard that the Biden administration was firm with Iran about it at all, not even publicly stating that the assassination of a political candidate in the US by Iran was a "red line", which would be condemned "in the strongest possible terms" LOL.

Shouldn't the US have laid the law down to Iran back then and declared it an act of war for Iran to be plotting the assassination of a political candidate in the US?

We have been at war with Iran for 47 years.

This is ending that war.
 
I would think they are. If another country had credible plots to assassinate a president of the United States, isn't that something requiring a response from the United States? Case in point, as recently has 2024 Iran had credible plots to assassinate Donald Trump. This was well known and the Biden administration even briefed Trump on it.

But, what did Biden do about it? I haven't even heard that the Biden administration was firm with Iran about it at all, not even publicly stating that the assassination of a political candidate in the US by Iran was a "red line", which would be condemned "in the strongest possible terms" LOL.

Shouldn't the US have laid the law down to Iran back then and declared it an act of war for Iran to be plotting the assassination of a political candidate in the US?


So now are you reaching for this as justification?
 
I would think they are. If another country had credible plots to assassinate a president of the United States, isn't that something requiring a response from the United States? Case in point, as recently has 2024 Iran had credible plots to assassinate Donald Trump. This was well known and the Biden administration even briefed Trump on it.

But, what did Biden do about it? I haven't even heard that the Biden administration was firm with Iran about it at all, not even publicly stating that the assassination of a political candidate in the US by Iran was a "red line", which would be condemned "in the strongest possible terms" LOL.

Shouldn't the US have laid the law down to Iran back then and declared it an act of war for Iran to be plotting the assassination of a political candidate in the US?

Let’s review the USMB Law Book, 3rd edition:

The USMB Law Book

§ 1776.04 — Unauthorized Acts of War

(a) Any President of the United States engaging in the overthrow, destabilization, regime change, or enthusiastic rearrangement of a foreign government shall be deemed to have committed an illegal act of war if, and only if, said President is a member of the Democratic Party.

(b) Identical conduct undertaken by a Republican President shall instead be classified as:
  1. Strength,
  2. Peace through leadership, or
  3. Owning the libs.

(c) All determinations under this section shall be applied retroactively, and selectively,
 
Let’s review the USMB Law Book, 3rd edition:

The USMB Law Book

§ 1776.04 — Unauthorized Acts of War

(a) Any President of the United States engaging in the overthrow, destabilization, regime change, or enthusiastic rearrangement of a foreign government shall be deemed to have committed an illegal act of war if, and only if, said President is a member of the Democratic Party.

(b) Identical conduct undertaken by a Republican President shall instead be classified as:
  1. Strength,
  2. Peace through leadership, or
  3. Owning the libs.

(c) All determinations under this section shall be applied retroactively, and selectively,
You're a bit late there, jakey
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom