W - Rush supported him on the middle east, he opposed him on spending. Hint, hint, Rush is a con, W is a neocon. You have no idea why, do you?
But, but wouldn't a CON oppose W on the Middle East
Not necessarily, but that would be a possible difference. Not the difference between Rush and W though. The answer to that is easy, and you didn't know. Proving again you don't know what the **** you're talking about
[and a neoCON would support W on the Middle East???
Yes, they probabaly would. But there are other factors where Rush and W disagree that are basic to the difference between con and neocon that you keep screaming you don't know. OK, girlfriend, you don't know ...
[Why yes, a neoCON WOULD support Bush on the Middle East!!!
Probably, yes, and a complete whiff for you on why Rush isn't a neocon, that has zero to do with it.
This is comic. You don't know the difference between a con (e.g., Rush) and a neocon (e.g., W and Obama). You have no ******* clue. It's hilarious