Are gag orders constitutional?

[kaz]

I have not stolen any content. I mocked you for the attempted insult. But that is all.

Reread the OP. This thread is not about Trump. Stay on topic.

"Fake News" is Trump content, dolt. You also copied my content. That isn't lazy, it's an admission Trump and my content is better than yours. Thanks, but come up with your own content

 

[jc456]

I never said it was the same. I simply pointed out that the free speech right can be limited in certain circumstances.

You still haven’t explained why you think gag order fits

 

[jc456]

Gag orders are to stack the deck

Exactly. Idaho 4 taught me that now

 

[WinterBorn]

Gag orders are to stack the deck

Stack what deck? Neither the prosecution nor the defense can talk about the trial outside of the courtroom.

 

[WEATHER53]

Exactly. Idaho 4 taught me that now

Gags are for weak cases where a feckless judge wants to assure that the side the judge favors has a better chance to prevail

 

[WinterBorn]

You still haven’t explained why you think gag order fits

Yes I have. It is an abridgement of the right of free speech to protect witnesses, keep the jury pool pure and to make sure the trial is fair.

 

[WinterBorn]

Exactly. Idaho 4 taught me that now

Was the info released before or after the gag order was in place in the Idaho 4 trial?

 

[WEATHER53]

Stack what deck? Neither the prosecution nor the defense can talk about the trial outside of the courtroom.

Trump can’t say”Schumers girlfriend” because it ruffles feathers. Light years from actual illegality

 

[kaz]

Yes I have. It is an abridgement of the right of free speech to protect witnesses, keep the jury pool pure and to make sure the trial is fair.

You just can't name any of them or show where Trump has threatened anyone.

This vague hand waiving BS is exactly how you justify Democrat election fraud. No names, no evidence, no examples, just air

 

[WinterBorn]

"Fake News" is Trump content, dolt. You also copied my content. That isn't lazy, it's an admission Trump and my content is better than yours. Thanks, but come up with your own content

Back to the topic.

 

[WinterBorn]

You just can't name any of them or show where Trump has threatened anyone.

This vague hand waiving BS is exactly how you justify Democrat election fraud. No names, no evidence, no examples, just air

I am discussing whether gag orders are unconstitutional. How about you do the same?

 

[WinterBorn]

Trump can’t say”Schumers girlfriend” because it ruffles feathers. Light years from actual illegality

Once again, the thread is not about Trump. The OP specifically said as much.

 

[kaz]

Back to the topic.

I was responding to what you said, Homer

 

[kaz]

I am discussing whether gag orders are unconstitutional. How about you do the same?

Using gag orders to silence your political opposition is totally Unconstitutional. But you know that, or you would suddenly if we flipped parties

 

[jc456]

Was the info released before or after the gag order was in place in the Idaho 4 trial?

Did you watch the video I posted?

 

[WinterBorn]

I was responding to what you said, Homer

And I am responding to you.

 

[WinterBorn]

Using gag orders to silence your political opposition is totally Unconstitutional. But you know that, or you would suddenly if we flipped parties

Gag orders are used for court/trials.

 

[WinterBorn]

Did you watch the video I posted?

Yes I did. And it looked like most of the info released was pre-trial.

 

[jc456]

Yes I did. And it looked like most of the info released was pre-trial.

So? It’s pushing a narrative that the defendant can’t respond to

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The court is trying to do something similar in the Delphi case. Judge over stepping legal boundaries by trying to stop legal counsel for the defendant. What’s wrong with you demofks?

You don't know what you are talking about, there.

Remember the last 3 pages of you whining about lawyers leaking stuff?

That's what the defense team did, in that case. And the judge removed them because of it.