are Dems still in favor of ending the filibuster and packing the supreme court ?

[AZrailwhale]

Just an FYI .. FDRs attempt to pack the court .. failed.

Not really, he scared the existing justices into stopping opposing him, then eased them out and replaced them one for one with men who would support him. He didn’t raise the number of justices because his own party stopped him, he just changed the whole character of SCOTUS into lap dogs.

 

[Doc7505]

The SCOTUS was never designed to be Political and Partisan.


What Changed?

~~~~~~~
Then why did Obama started to make the changes and Schumer want to pack the court like FDR attempt to pack SCOTUS .
The answer is; Why fix it when it's not broke...

FDR & The Court Packing Controversy: Full Script | Supreme Court Historical Society

FDR & The Court Packing Controversy documents President's Roosevelt attempt to expand the Supreme Court in the face of opposition to New Deal initiatives: Full Documentary Script

supremecourthistory.org

**********​

FDR Tries to "Pack" the Supreme Court - Teach Democracy

Teach Democracy FOUNDATION Bill of Rights in ActionFall 1994 (10:4)Updated July 2000The U.S. Supreme CourtBRIA 10:4 Home | FDR Tries to "Pack" the Supreme Court | Should Nations Have the Rights to Kidnap Criminal Su, The series of anti-New Deal decisions by the Supreme Court angered President...

teachdemocracy.org

**********​

Why Are There Nine Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court? | Britannica

How did nine become the magic number for the U.S.’s most-powerful judicial body?

www.britannica.com

 

[Moonglow]

after the red wave are Dems still in favor of the party in power ending the filibuster and packing the supreme court ?

https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4817294-filibuster-democrats-abolition/

The number of judges has been changed in the past and the US survived.

 

[Doc7505]

The number of judges has been changed in the past and the US survived.

~~~~~~
Indeed...

Why Are There Nine Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court? | Britannica

How did nine become the magic number for the U.S.’s most-powerful judicial body?

www.britannica.com

Yet, Like FDR, Joey B. and his sidekick Schumer attempted to and also failed,
Well,for this presidency. can't vouch for the future.

 

[BluesLegend]

The SCOTUS was never designed to be Political and Partisan.


What Changed?

Dem filth came to power and we had to take measures.

 

[BluesLegend]

I'm just guessing but did the Dems go full CRICKETS on getting rid of the filibuster and packing the SCOTUS?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The SCOTUS was never designed to be Political and Partisan.


What Changed?

Leftism.

 

[Moonglow]

~~~~~~
Indeed...

Why Are There Nine Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court? | Britannica

How did nine become the magic number for the U.S.’s most-powerful judicial body?

www.britannica.com

Yet, Like FDR, Joey B. and his sidekick Schumer back far attempted to and also failed,
Well,for this presidency. can't vouch for the future.

You have not gone back far enough

 

[Moonglow]

Leftism.

Wrong, it was slavery

 

[yidnar]

The number of judges has been changed in the past and the US survived.

ok .. then Trump should point 4 more justices eh ??

 

[Blaster]

after the red wave are Dems still in favor of the party in power ending the filibuster and packing the supreme court ?

https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4817294-filibuster-democrats-abolition/

Ain't gonna happen.

 

[Crepitus]

No, for the first time since FDR packed it in the thirties, SCOTUS has become balanced and relative constitutional rather than reliably liberal,

Then why do they keep ignoring the Constitution?

 

[Independent thinker]

after the red wave are Dems still in favor of the party in power ending the filibuster and packing the supreme court ?

https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4817294-filibuster-democrats-abolition/

They said they were.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Then why do they keep ignoring the Constitution?

They don’t. Every decision in the past four years has been grounded on the constitution. If anything, they have been indulging the liberals on the court too much.

 

[BluesLegend]

Any Dems still want to pack the SCOTUS? I'm guessing no.