Are democrats intentionally trying to lose the 2016 election?

[Redfish]

Back to the OP, who do you have besides hillybilly for 2016, dems? Biden? Cuomo? Bloomberg? the fool from Mass? Schumer? Pelosi? Reid? Franken? Ya got no one because hilly will not be allowed to run by the dem power brokers because they know she would lose big time.

Obama has destroyed the dem party, hope you are all glad you gave the fool two terms to complete the destruction.

 

[Redfish]

Yeah, that was a bizarre statement.

you lefties cannot comprehend the english language. He said that the large cities in CA and CO dominate the vote even though a majority of the people outside the cities disagree. that happens to be true in almost every state.

what is bizarre about the truth?

Have difficulties with the concept of "one man one vote"?

Are you implying the votes of those who live in the country should count more than those who live in a city?

of course not, but city dwelers tend to be liberal and those outside cities tend to be conservative. The big cities dominate many states because of sheer numbers of voters.

thats a simple fact.

we almost have that situation here in Louisiana where New Orleans and Baton Rouge have almost as many voters as the rest of the state. The good thing is that even though Orleans parish always goes dem, baton rouge is split about 50/50.

 

[rightwinger]

you lefties cannot comprehend the english language. He said that the large cities in CA and CO dominate the vote even though a majority of the people outside the cities disagree. that happens to be true in almost every state.

what is bizarre about the truth?

Have difficulties with the concept of "one man one vote"?

Are you implying the votes of those who live in the country should count more than those who live in a city?

of course not, but city dwelers tend to be liberal and those outside cities tend to be conservative. The big cities dominate many states because of sheer numbers of voters.

thats a simple fact.

we almost have that situation here in Louisiana where New Orleans and Baton Rouge have almost as many voters as the rest of the state. The good thing is that even though Orleans parish always goes dem, baton rouge is split about 50/50.

So majority rules.

They call them cities for a reason.....A lot of people live there

 

[expatriate]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

 

[Redfish]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

you are a funny dude. I too do not have a day job and just sit back and watch my money grow, as to who makes more, I would venture a guess that my portfolio exceeds yours by several zeros, but who really cares, sounds like we both did pretty well in the world of work and are now enjoying the fruits of our labors.

your attempts at juvenile insults make me wonder if you are really what you claim to be, but lying on an internet message board is quite common. most successful people outgrow that kind of foolishness.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make about Mass, but yes, the dems dominate that state. are you saying that is a good or bad thing? Republicans dominate my state, except for our silly senator Mary Landrieu and she will not be back after the next election. Do I think its good that the GOP dominates? not really. I am more interested in what the people stand for than what letter is behind their name.Mary's brother is mayor of New Orleans and is doing a very good job.

the earlier discussion on whether one party rule would be good or bad at the national level is totally different from a state discussion. without an opposition party the president could become a defacto dictator with a compliant congress to endorse his every wish.

personally I think that would not be good. If you do, then I guess we will just have to disagree.

 

[Redfish]

Have difficulties with the concept of "one man one vote"?

Are you implying the votes of those who live in the country should count more than those who live in a city?

of course not, but city dwelers tend to be liberal and those outside cities tend to be conservative. The big cities dominate many states because of sheer numbers of voters.

thats a simple fact.

we almost have that situation here in Louisiana where New Orleans and Baton Rouge have almost as many voters as the rest of the state. The good thing is that even though Orleans parish always goes dem, baton rouge is split about 50/50.

So majority rules.

They call them cities for a reason.....A lot of people live there

Yes--------WTF point are you trying to make? Are you claiming that the big cities do not control the vote in california?

I am not saying its wrong or right, just that that is how it is.

 

[Redfish]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

sorry, I didn't address your comment about 2016. First, who in 2005 thought that obama would be the candidate in 2008?

Who knows who the parties will run in 2016? I don't. But I do not think that the dem power brokers will take a chance with Hillary, she is damaged goods--too old, too much baggage, too many crazy ass quotes. So I ask you, who will the dems run?

 

[MikeK]

If the dems continue to support obama's failed marxism and run the failed secstate Hillary, then the GOP could very easily take over the senate, keep the house, and take the whitehouse.

The american people are fed up with being lied to and having the country run by incompetent, arrogant, narcsssistic big-government thugs.

Enjoy it while you can dems, obama has sealed your coffins.

I'm afraid you're right.

I held my nose and voted for Obama in 2007. And while I can't say McCain would have done any better in the long run I will agree that Obama has been a grave disappointment. He's turned out to be little more than a deceitful puppet of the banks and Wall Street.

 

[JoeB131]

right, hispanics are going to be very happy about the way obama and DOJ are attacking zimmerman after a trial found him not guilty.

if we dump the EC the west coast and the NE still would control the elections.

I haven't heard any Hispanics claim Zimmerman as one of their own. The attempts of white people to dump him on their doorstep notwithstanding.

 

[expatriate]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

sorry, I didn't address your comment about 2016. First, who in 2005 thought that obama would be the candidate in 2008?

Who knows who the parties will run in 2016? I don't. But I do not think that the dem power brokers will take a chance with Hillary, she is damaged goods--too old, too much baggage, too many crazy ass quotes. So I ask you, who will the dems run?

asked and answered. Hillary Clinton will be our nominee if she wants the job. You don't know squat about "dem power brokers".

 

[expatriate]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

you are a funny dude. I too do not have a day job and just sit back and watch my money grow, as to who makes more, I would venture a guess that my portfolio exceeds yours by several zeros, but who really cares, sounds like we both did pretty well in the world of work and are now enjoying the fruits of our labors.

your attempts at juvenile insults make me wonder if you are really what you claim to be, but lying on an internet message board is quite common. most successful people outgrow that kind of foolishness.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make about Mass, but yes, the dems dominate that state. are you saying that is a good or bad thing? Republicans dominate my state, except for our silly senator Mary Landrieu and she will not be back after the next election. Do I think its good that the GOP dominates? not really. I am more interested in what the people stand for than what letter is behind their name.Mary's brother is mayor of New Orleans and is doing a very good job.

the earlier discussion on whether one party rule would be good or bad at the national level is totally different from a state discussion. without an opposition party the president could become a defacto dictator with a compliant congress to endorse his every wish.

personally I think that would not be good. If you do, then I guess we will just have to disagree.

everybody's portfolio on the internet has a lot of zeros. And every man's e-dick is 12 inches long.

and as to your defacto dictator bullshit. Ten of our 44 presidents have served their entire terms in office with their own party in control of both houses of congress. How many of them were defacto dictators? and did we survive their dictatorships?

 

[Redfish]

A few points for whitefish:

1. I don't have a day job. My money is busy making more money in a week than you make in a month, and all I have to do is work on my tan and maybe play some golf if I'm inthemood.

2. Of COURSE Massachusetts is dominated by democrats. The fact that they picked an apparently moderate republican governor means nothing... Especially when they didn't vote for him again, and, back then, he was so liberal, he championed RomneyCare. The fact that they picked Scott Brown to fill the rest of Teddy's term was an anomaly. They booted him at the end of that partial term and voted for Liz Warren instead.

The Governor is a democrat
Both US Senators are democrats
All nine Congressmen are democrats
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state senate is 36-4
The Democratic balance of power in the MA state house is 127-30

That is the picture of domination. Republicans in Massachusetts are either an afterthought or a joke.

3. Your predictions about the 2016 race are pretty laughable. Please know that that is all you have: biased predictions with NADA to back them up. I have yet to hear you give us any viable names of potential republican candidates so we can see what polling today shows about them in head to head match ups with Hillary.

You don't know nearly as much about politics as you think you do. Really.

you are a funny dude. I too do not have a day job and just sit back and watch my money grow, as to who makes more, I would venture a guess that my portfolio exceeds yours by several zeros, but who really cares, sounds like we both did pretty well in the world of work and are now enjoying the fruits of our labors.

your attempts at juvenile insults make me wonder if you are really what you claim to be, but lying on an internet message board is quite common. most successful people outgrow that kind of foolishness.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make about Mass, but yes, the dems dominate that state. are you saying that is a good or bad thing? Republicans dominate my state, except for our silly senator Mary Landrieu and she will not be back after the next election. Do I think its good that the GOP dominates? not really. I am more interested in what the people stand for than what letter is behind their name.Mary's brother is mayor of New Orleans and is doing a very good job.

the earlier discussion on whether one party rule would be good or bad at the national level is totally different from a state discussion. without an opposition party the president could become a defacto dictator with a compliant congress to endorse his every wish.

personally I think that would not be good. If you do, then I guess we will just have to disagree.

everybody's portfolio on the internet has a lot of zeros. And every man's e-dick is 12 inches long.

and as to your defacto dictator bullshit. Ten of our 44 presidents have served their entire terms in office with their own party in control of both houses of congress. How many of them were defacto dictators? and did we survive their dictatorships?

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

 

[expatriate]

you are a funny dude. I too do not have a day job and just sit back and watch my money grow, as to who makes more, I would venture a guess that my portfolio exceeds yours by several zeros, but who really cares, sounds like we both did pretty well in the world of work and are now enjoying the fruits of our labors.

your attempts at juvenile insults make me wonder if you are really what you claim to be, but lying on an internet message board is quite common. most successful people outgrow that kind of foolishness.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make about Mass, but yes, the dems dominate that state. are you saying that is a good or bad thing? Republicans dominate my state, except for our silly senator Mary Landrieu and she will not be back after the next election. Do I think its good that the GOP dominates? not really. I am more interested in what the people stand for than what letter is behind their name.Mary's brother is mayor of New Orleans and is doing a very good job.

the earlier discussion on whether one party rule would be good or bad at the national level is totally different from a state discussion. without an opposition party the president could become a defacto dictator with a compliant congress to endorse his every wish.

personally I think that would not be good. If you do, then I guess we will just have to disagree.

everybody's portfolio on the internet has a lot of zeros. And every man's e-dick is 12 inches long.

and as to your defacto dictator bullshit. Ten of our 44 presidents have served their entire terms in office with their own party in control of both houses of congress. How many of them were defacto dictators? and did we survive their dictatorships?

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

I could care less about your cajun dick... the fact that you claimed to have "more zeros" in your portfolio than mine was the part I was laughing about. How the **** would YOU know that?

And your opinions about Obama's patriotism have about as much value to me as a crawfish shell.

Defacto dictatorship. what bullshit.

 

[Redfish]

everybody's portfolio on the internet has a lot of zeros. And every man's e-dick is 12 inches long.

and as to your defacto dictator bullshit. Ten of our 44 presidents have served their entire terms in office with their own party in control of both houses of congress. How many of them were defacto dictators? and did we survive their dictatorships?

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

I could care less about your cajun dick... the fact that you claimed to have "more zeros" in your portfolio than mine was the part I was laughing about. How the **** would YOU know that?

And your opinions about Obama's patriotism have about as much value to me as a crawfish shell.

Defacto dictatorship. what bullshit.

its happening in Detroit as we speak. Liberal democrats have had total control for over 30 years. Is Detroit your vision for the entire country? or maybe the broke blue state of california?

Watch---very soon obozo will be pushing to bail out these two examples of failed liberalism.

Have you ever picked up a world history text book? If not, maybe you should, if so, you must have slept through the class. Liberalism always fails---every time---no exceptions.

 

[expatriate]

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

I could care less about your cajun dick... the fact that you claimed to have "more zeros" in your portfolio than mine was the part I was laughing about. How the **** would YOU know that?

And your opinions about Obama's patriotism have about as much value to me as a crawfish shell.

Defacto dictatorship. what bullshit.

its happening in Detroit as we speak. Liberal democrats have had total control for over 30 years. Is Detroit your vision for the entire country? or maybe the broke blue state of california?

Watch---very soon obozo will be pushing to bail out these two examples of failed liberalism.

Have you ever picked up a world history text book? If not, maybe you should, if so, you must have slept through the class. Liberalism always fails---every time---no exceptions.

who exactly is the "dictator" in detroit?

and puhleeeeze... don't go tryin' to school ME ************. I have a fine education and I don't need any lessons from you.

 

[Redfish]

I could care less about your cajun dick... the fact that you claimed to have "more zeros" in your portfolio than mine was the part I was laughing about. How the **** would YOU know that?

And your opinions about Obama's patriotism have about as much value to me as a crawfish shell.

Defacto dictatorship. what bullshit.

its happening in Detroit as we speak. Liberal democrats have had total control for over 30 years. Is Detroit your vision for the entire country? or maybe the broke blue state of california?

Watch---very soon obozo will be pushing to bail out these two examples of failed liberalism.

Have you ever picked up a world history text book? If not, maybe you should, if so, you must have slept through the class. Liberalism always fails---every time---no exceptions.

who exactly is the "dictator" in detroit?

and puhleeeeze... don't go tryin' to school ME ************. I have a fine education and I don't need any lessons from you.

the dictator in Detroit is, and has been for years, the liberal democrat party supported by the UAW. A dictatorial regime does not mean a one man dictator.

your postings don't indicate that you stayed awake through your fine education. Let me guess, you went to high school in a blue state and college in either california or mass.

If I am right, you are proof that liberal indoctrination is not an education.

 

[expatriate]

its happening in Detroit as we speak. Liberal democrats have had total control for over 30 years. Is Detroit your vision for the entire country? or maybe the broke blue state of california?

Watch---very soon obozo will be pushing to bail out these two examples of failed liberalism.

Have you ever picked up a world history text book? If not, maybe you should, if so, you must have slept through the class. Liberalism always fails---every time---no exceptions.

who exactly is the "dictator" in detroit?

and puhleeeeze... don't go tryin' to school ME ************. I have a fine education and I don't need any lessons from you.

the dictator in Detroit is, and has been for years, the liberal democrat party supported by the UAW. A dictatorial regime does not mean a one man dictator.

your postings don't indicate that you stayed awake through your fine education. Let me guess, you went to high school in a blue state and college in either california or mass.

If I am right, you are proof that liberal indoctrination is not an education.

you are wrong. I went to college at a federal service academy located in maryland. and I served for a quarter of a century in navy blue. For you to call the city government of detroit, MI a "dictatorial regime" only proves you are a partisan idiot... why am I not surprised?

 

[NYcarbineer]

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

I could care less about your cajun dick... the fact that you claimed to have "more zeros" in your portfolio than mine was the part I was laughing about. How the **** would YOU know that?

And your opinions about Obama's patriotism have about as much value to me as a crawfish shell.

Defacto dictatorship. what bullshit.

its happening in Detroit as we speak. Liberal democrats have had total control for over 30 years. Is Detroit your vision for the entire country? or maybe the broke blue state of california?

Watch---very soon obozo will be pushing to bail out these two examples of failed liberalism.

Have you ever picked up a world history text book? If not, maybe you should, if so, you must have slept through the class. Liberalism always fails---every time---no exceptions.

Why hasn't the state of Massachusetts failed?

 

[rightwinger]

you are a funny dude. I too do not have a day job and just sit back and watch my money grow, as to who makes more, I would venture a guess that my portfolio exceeds yours by several zeros, but who really cares, sounds like we both did pretty well in the world of work and are now enjoying the fruits of our labors.

your attempts at juvenile insults make me wonder if you are really what you claim to be, but lying on an internet message board is quite common. most successful people outgrow that kind of foolishness.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make about Mass, but yes, the dems dominate that state. are you saying that is a good or bad thing? Republicans dominate my state, except for our silly senator Mary Landrieu and she will not be back after the next election. Do I think its good that the GOP dominates? not really. I am more interested in what the people stand for than what letter is behind their name.Mary's brother is mayor of New Orleans and is doing a very good job.

the earlier discussion on whether one party rule would be good or bad at the national level is totally different from a state discussion. without an opposition party the president could become a defacto dictator with a compliant congress to endorse his every wish.

personally I think that would not be good. If you do, then I guess we will just have to disagree.

everybody's portfolio on the internet has a lot of zeros. And every man's e-dick is 12 inches long.

and as to your defacto dictator bullshit. Ten of our 44 presidents have served their entire terms in office with their own party in control of both houses of congress. How many of them were defacto dictators? and did we survive their dictatorships?

the difference is that all of them put the country first and loved the USA. Obama does not fall into that group.

why are you interested in my cajun dick? are you some kind of pervert?

anyone who puts his net worth on the internet is indeed a fool who deserves to lose it.

One of conservatives more endearing qualities. Calling President Obama a dictator and actually believing that he does not love his country and is not a "real American"

A true Party of Stupid

 

[AceRothstein]

We need to let this dumpster fire burn itself out.