Are Democrats disappointed the recent massacre was the result of a sex addiction as opposed racism?

[Slade3200]

If we want to get technical pretty much all violent attacks against another person are based on hate to some degree so really all violent attacks are hate crimes.

Haha. Playing word games now? You could also say all crimes have some degree of mental illness and insanity. But like with hate crimes we have a system to determine what qualifies. You seem to just want to play dumb to that. Why’s that?

It's called being honest so your confusion is understanble you see some of us don't try and use every tragedy to push the political narrative of our choice. From the moment this story broke the left has tried to use it to push a race and political storyline nevermind no evidence has been presented to support that claim the shooter himself has told police that his motive was because of his alleged sex addiction and yet the left still tries to push there prefered agenda of race and politics. Maybe this man is telling the truth maybe he is not I don't know neither do you or anyone else here or in the media what I do know is I am not the one trying to push a narrative for the shooting to support a political viewpoint the one's doing that are not playing dumb they are dumb something you should seriously think about even though we all know you wont.

You’re right, we don’t know why or why not this guy did what he did, and you’re right that people are using this tragedy to try and highlight a wave of anti Asian violence and bigotry thats has been surging as of late so they can demonize the hateful rhetoric and hopefully reduce the violence. Now why you wouldn’t support that cause beats me, but it sounds like the wrong side to be on.

 

[Slade3200]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

 

[Dadoalex]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

Anyone else see what Slade did? He said the killer's motive is not what the killer says, but what the Democrats desire.

Haha, is that what I said?! Wow, I just reread what I wrote and it read quite differently than what you just wrote. Are you on a bender or something? That was a huge miss

Oh now you're denying it. What a coward.

Denying what? I’m simply saying that you lie about my statements as clearly evidenced by reading the thread

No I didn't, it's in black and white. You clearly said we shouldn't believe the culprit, which is another way of saying we should side with your Demonicrats this is the result of white male RACISTS.

Are you prepared to admit your party markets racism yet Slade?

The party of slavery only changed tactics Slade, and you're a member.

Haha. Saying that it’s silly to just take the word of a mass murderer stands alone. It does not imply to believe anybody else. The whole point of the statement is to not blindly just believe anybody. But you need to lie and imply that I’m saying to side with the democrats... whatever the hell that means. I don’t even know why a mass murder needs to be a partisan thing. What’s wrong with you?!

Oh I see dumbfuck. You said the same fucking thing all over again. Don't believe what the culprit says was his motive, we must believe the Demonicrats say, as this is the result of racism cuz it's the Asian's turn.

Lying again I see. I literally just explained what I meant but you’re gonna keep repeating your false interpretation. You’re such an idiot

See my signature.........That's clearly YOU

And the subject change. Thanks for playing. Try a little less lying in the future it will be easier for you to last longer in these debates.

I know PROGS are high on words and low on actions, but I don't play pretend. I clearly pointed out what you're doing and it's per my signature, which you call "changing the subject".

History Slade, history.

Culprit said he shot up SPAS because of his sexual addition.

Democrats insist this was the result of racism, because you know, that's their model. They need & crave racism.

Slade says don't believe the culprit because he's nuts, which clearly implies Slade wants you to believe it's what his people want you to believe.

Irony is it's your people who are nuts, but we're supposed to believe them just cuz.

His sexual addiction was to people of Oriental descent.
That is racism
While he may have undertake the murders because of his addiction
He chose his victims because of their race.
That is racism.

So is your refusal to see what is clearly in the light of day.

My cousin is white and only dates Asian women due his preferences. According to you he must be racist.

Hear that fuckers, if you prefer hispanic, black, white or blah blah blah then you're RACIST.

I prefer women. Real women. and that makes me sexist.

So remember, should you have a sex addiction & prefer a certain racs, and should you end up killing them, then YOU'RE RACIST

So your cousin have a sexual fetish involving Asians. How is that NOT racist?

Biologically we all work EXACTLY the same. Men, Women all identical except on the outside.
When you fixate on the outside appearance and ignore the inside functionality that is racism.

Your cousin, according to your own words, has a sexual fetish involving Asians.

Oh, my cousin has a sexual fetish now & it's racist. This is how PROGS think. I stopped reading there, why would someone continue reading when the first thing out of your mouth is YOUR DESIRES?

I can't wait to tell my race conscious son, who recently left the Democrats behind that the reason he's most attracted to Latino & blacks is because he's racist and it's sexual fetish only.

You said it slappy.
Your cousin only wants sex with Asians. That is a fetish just like a guy who can't do it until someone spanks him.
Maybe you could join your cousin, son, and probably the rest of your family in therapy.

You're right, FUCK! I'm most attracted to blonds with brown eyes, and until today I didn't realize that was racist & signals white supremacy.

I'm curious since you only like men, does that mean you're genderphobic?

Racist...Check
White Supremacist...Check
Dumb as a stack of cow shit...Check
Republican...Check

Yep. you check all the boxes including your fantacized lover...

Have fun whackin it lover boy.

 

[Dadoalex]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

Anyone else see what Slade did? He said the killer's motive is not what the killer says, but what the Democrats desire.

Haha, is that what I said?! Wow, I just reread what I wrote and it read quite differently than what you just wrote. Are you on a bender or something? That was a huge miss

Oh now you're denying it. What a coward.

Denying what? I’m simply saying that you lie about my statements as clearly evidenced by reading the thread

No I didn't, it's in black and white. You clearly said we shouldn't believe the culprit, which is another way of saying we should side with your Demonicrats this is the result of white male RACISTS.

Are you prepared to admit your party markets racism yet Slade?

The party of slavery only changed tactics Slade, and you're a member.

Haha. Saying that it’s silly to just take the word of a mass murderer stands alone. It does not imply to believe anybody else. The whole point of the statement is to not blindly just believe anybody. But you need to lie and imply that I’m saying to side with the democrats... whatever the hell that means. I don’t even know why a mass murder needs to be a partisan thing. What’s wrong with you?!

Oh I see dumbfuck. You said the same fucking thing all over again. Don't believe what the culprit says was his motive, we must believe the Demonicrats say, as this is the result of racism cuz it's the Asian's turn.

Lying again I see. I literally just explained what I meant but you’re gonna keep repeating your false interpretation. You’re such an idiot

See my signature.........That's clearly YOU

And the subject change. Thanks for playing. Try a little less lying in the future it will be easier for you to last longer in these debates.

I know PROGS are high on words and low on actions, but I don't play pretend. I clearly pointed out what you're doing and it's per my signature, which you call "changing the subject".

History Slade, history.

Culprit said he shot up SPAS because of his sexual addition.

Democrats insist this was the result of racism, because you know, that's their model. They need & crave racism.

Slade says don't believe the culprit because he's nuts, which clearly implies Slade wants you to believe it's what his people want you to believe.

Irony is it's your people who are nuts, but we're supposed to believe them just cuz.

His sexual addiction was to people of Oriental descent.
That is racism
While he may have undertake the murders because of his addiction
He chose his victims because of their race.
That is racism.

So is your refusal to see what is clearly in the light of day.

My cousin is white and only dates Asian women due his preferences. According to you he must be racist.

Hear that fuckers, if you prefer hispanic, black, white or blah blah blah then you're RACIST.

I prefer women. Real women. and that makes me sexist.

So remember, should you have a sex addiction & prefer a certain racs, and should you end up killing them, then YOU'RE RACIST

So your cousin have a sexual fetish involving Asians. How is that NOT racist?

Biologically we all work EXACTLY the same. Men, Women all identical except on the outside.
When you fixate on the outside appearance and ignore the inside functionality that is racism.

Your cousin, according to your own words, has a sexual fetish involving Asians.

I would take people like Slade more serious if they would call out retarded shit like this.

Even the hardcore lefties have to think this is ridiculous.

The guy had a sexual fetish for Asian Women...not women, women of a particular race.
He was fixated on sex with these women, these Asian women. Only Asian women.
Using that fetish as an excuse for violence
Just as many White people use their fears and fixations as excuses for violence against people of color
He turned his gun on these Asian women.
Because his church told him his fetish was "evil" and his racist fetish made him feel guilty for which he blamed, not himself for holding the fetish, not the church for the guilt, no, he turned his gun on those women BECAUSE THEY WERE ASIAN which was the same reason he frequented those businesses in the first place.

There are 8 people dead and six of them for no reason other than being an Asian woman.
If you cannot see the racism here you need to open your eyes.

 

[Rogue AI]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

Anyone else see what Slade did? He said the killer's motive is not what the killer says, but what the Democrats desire.

Haha, is that what I said?! Wow, I just reread what I wrote and it read quite differently than what you just wrote. Are you on a bender or something? That was a huge miss

Oh now you're denying it. What a coward.

Denying what? I’m simply saying that you lie about my statements as clearly evidenced by reading the thread

No I didn't, it's in black and white. You clearly said we shouldn't believe the culprit, which is another way of saying we should side with your Demonicrats this is the result of white male RACISTS.

Are you prepared to admit your party markets racism yet Slade?

The party of slavery only changed tactics Slade, and you're a member.

Haha. Saying that it’s silly to just take the word of a mass murderer stands alone. It does not imply to believe anybody else. The whole point of the statement is to not blindly just believe anybody. But you need to lie and imply that I’m saying to side with the democrats... whatever the hell that means. I don’t even know why a mass murder needs to be a partisan thing. What’s wrong with you?!

Oh I see dumbfuck. You said the same fucking thing all over again. Don't believe what the culprit says was his motive, we must believe the Demonicrats say, as this is the result of racism cuz it's the Asian's turn.

Lying again I see. I literally just explained what I meant but you’re gonna keep repeating your false interpretation. You’re such an idiot

See my signature.........That's clearly YOU

And the subject change. Thanks for playing. Try a little less lying in the future it will be easier for you to last longer in these debates.

I know PROGS are high on words and low on actions, but I don't play pretend. I clearly pointed out what you're doing and it's per my signature, which you call "changing the subject".

History Slade, history.

Culprit said he shot up SPAS because of his sexual addition.

Democrats insist this was the result of racism, because you know, that's their model. They need & crave racism.

Slade says don't believe the culprit because he's nuts, which clearly implies Slade wants you to believe it's what his people want you to believe.

Irony is it's your people who are nuts, but we're supposed to believe them just cuz.

His sexual addiction was to people of Oriental descent.
That is racism
While he may have undertake the murders because of his addiction
He chose his victims because of their race.
That is racism.

So is your refusal to see what is clearly in the light of day.

Not all the victims were Asian, that dog don't hunt. You folks need racism, because if you go after his deviancy and perversion you'll ruffle the feather of all the other deviant freaks the left holds so dear.

 

[Slade3200]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

Anyone else see what Slade did? He said the killer's motive is not what the killer says, but what the Democrats desire.

Haha, is that what I said?! Wow, I just reread what I wrote and it read quite differently than what you just wrote. Are you on a bender or something? That was a huge miss

Oh now you're denying it. What a coward.

Denying what? I’m simply saying that you lie about my statements as clearly evidenced by reading the thread

No I didn't, it's in black and white. You clearly said we shouldn't believe the culprit, which is another way of saying we should side with your Demonicrats this is the result of white male RACISTS.

Are you prepared to admit your party markets racism yet Slade?

The party of slavery only changed tactics Slade, and you're a member.

Haha. Saying that it’s silly to just take the word of a mass murderer stands alone. It does not imply to believe anybody else. The whole point of the statement is to not blindly just believe anybody. But you need to lie and imply that I’m saying to side with the democrats... whatever the hell that means. I don’t even know why a mass murder needs to be a partisan thing. What’s wrong with you?!

Oh I see dumbfuck. You said the same fucking thing all over again. Don't believe what the culprit says was his motive, we must believe the Demonicrats say, as this is the result of racism cuz it's the Asian's turn.

Lying again I see. I literally just explained what I meant but you’re gonna keep repeating your false interpretation. You’re such an idiot

See my signature.........That's clearly YOU

And the subject change. Thanks for playing. Try a little less lying in the future it will be easier for you to last longer in these debates.

I know PROGS are high on words and low on actions, but I don't play pretend. I clearly pointed out what you're doing and it's per my signature, which you call "changing the subject".

History Slade, history.

Culprit said he shot up SPAS because of his sexual addition.

Democrats insist this was the result of racism, because you know, that's their model. They need & crave racism.

Slade says don't believe the culprit because he's nuts, which clearly implies Slade wants you to believe it's what his people want you to believe.

Irony is it's your people who are nuts, but we're supposed to believe them just cuz.

His sexual addiction was to people of Oriental descent.
That is racism
While he may have undertake the murders because of his addiction
He chose his victims because of their race.
That is racism.

So is your refusal to see what is clearly in the light of day.

Not all the victims were Asian, that dog don't hunt. You folks need racism, because if you go after his deviancy and perversion you'll ruffle the feather of all the other deviant freaks the left holds so dear.

What’s wrong with going after racism?

 

[Rogue AI]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

Anyone else see what Slade did? He said the killer's motive is not what the killer says, but what the Democrats desire.

Haha, is that what I said?! Wow, I just reread what I wrote and it read quite differently than what you just wrote. Are you on a bender or something? That was a huge miss

Oh now you're denying it. What a coward.

Denying what? I’m simply saying that you lie about my statements as clearly evidenced by reading the thread

No I didn't, it's in black and white. You clearly said we shouldn't believe the culprit, which is another way of saying we should side with your Demonicrats this is the result of white male RACISTS.

Are you prepared to admit your party markets racism yet Slade?

The party of slavery only changed tactics Slade, and you're a member.

Haha. Saying that it’s silly to just take the word of a mass murderer stands alone. It does not imply to believe anybody else. The whole point of the statement is to not blindly just believe anybody. But you need to lie and imply that I’m saying to side with the democrats... whatever the hell that means. I don’t even know why a mass murder needs to be a partisan thing. What’s wrong with you?!

Oh I see dumbfuck. You said the same fucking thing all over again. Don't believe what the culprit says was his motive, we must believe the Demonicrats say, as this is the result of racism cuz it's the Asian's turn.

Lying again I see. I literally just explained what I meant but you’re gonna keep repeating your false interpretation. You’re such an idiot

See my signature.........That's clearly YOU

And the subject change. Thanks for playing. Try a little less lying in the future it will be easier for you to last longer in these debates.

I know PROGS are high on words and low on actions, but I don't play pretend. I clearly pointed out what you're doing and it's per my signature, which you call "changing the subject".

History Slade, history.

Culprit said he shot up SPAS because of his sexual addition.

Democrats insist this was the result of racism, because you know, that's their model. They need & crave racism.

Slade says don't believe the culprit because he's nuts, which clearly implies Slade wants you to believe it's what his people want you to believe.

Irony is it's your people who are nuts, but we're supposed to believe them just cuz.

His sexual addiction was to people of Oriental descent.
That is racism
While he may have undertake the murders because of his addiction
He chose his victims because of their race.
That is racism.

So is your refusal to see what is clearly in the light of day.

Not all the victims were Asian, that dog don't hunt. You folks need racism, because if you go after his deviancy and perversion you'll ruffle the feather of all the other deviant freaks the left holds so dear.

What’s wrong with going after racism?

If there was never racism present? You really don't get it, do you? Wow.

 

[ColonelAngus]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

So he was not a sex addict? Where do you get your information?

 

[Rogue AI]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

So he was not a sex addict? Where do you get your information?

Where liberals get all their information, from their FEELZ...

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dem political strategy:

Call opponent racist. Repeat.

 

[Slade3200]

While Biden sells this as an issue of racism, which if you go to his Facebook page they're clearly trying to sell off Asians as victims, just like they do everyone else not white male, it's the culprit's position his actions were the result of a sex addiction.

So the Democrats are at war for a proper narrative that suits their wicked ways. Do you Democrats will convince this guy that it's not what he thinks it is, but the result of racism?

Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals

When Brad Onishi heard that the man accused of a rampage at three Atlanta-area spas told detectives that he had carried out the attacks as a way to eliminate his own temptations, the claim sounded painfully familiar. Onishi, who grew up in a strict evangelical community in Southern California...

www.yahoo.com

So your position is all based on the claims of a mass murderer?! Haha. Figures

So he was not a sex addict? Where do you get your information?

When did I say he wasn’t a sex addict? Can you post my quote? Since I know you can’t I’ll accept your apology for misrepresenting my statements

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lets not forget Pelosi‘s stupid Chinatown photo op from 13 months ago.

Nancy Pelosi Visits San Francisco's Chinatown Amid Coronavirus Concerns

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi toured San Francisco’s Chinatown Monday to send a message. She said there’s no reason tourists or locals should be staying away from the area because of coronavirus concerns.

www.nbcbayarea.com

As Pelosi walked from the Golden Gate Fortune Cookie Factory to lunch at a dim sum restaurant, she hugged friends and waved to onlookers. She downplayed the racism issue, saying she understands people are concerned about China – the epicenter of the novel coronavirus.

 

[kaz]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

 

[ColonelAngus]

If killer said it was racism, would the left say you cant trust a killer?

 

[Slade3200]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

 

[kaz]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

I wasn't picking on a typo, I didn't understand your first pass or second pass at asking the question.

Does what am I "basing" my opinion on mean? What opinion? I said he changes his view based on party. Clearly if he had said an answer he wanted, like it was racism, then there would be no intellectual wait a second, he'd start screaming it was Trump's fault.

What opinion are you asking about? Since this is the third time and you still can't ask a clear question, I'll guess you mean what would I base my view on whether it was racism, sex obsession or something else.

No matter what the murderer said, I wouldn't believe it without corroborating evidence. That's what the investigation would be for.

The racists who murder people always end up voting for Democrats anyway. But I still wouldn't conclude that without support. Murderers lie and spin. Murder, lying and spinning all being most heavily Democrat fascist trades it makes sense they are Democrats.

If that isn't what you were trying to ask, you'll have to take a fourth attempt. Just sit down and think your question through and write it as a complete, clear thought. Be specific what you are asking

 

[Slade3200]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

I wasn't picking on a typo, I didn't understand your first pass or second pass at asking the question.

Does what am I "basing" my opinion on mean? What opinion? I said he changes his view based on party. Clearly if he had said an answer he wanted, like it was racism, then there would be no intellectual wait a second, he'd start screaming it was Trump's fault.

What opinion are you asking about? Since this is the third time and you still can't ask a clear question, I'll guess you mean what would I base my view on whether it was racism, sex obsession or something else.

No matter what the murderer said, I wouldn't believe it without corroborating evidence. That's what the investigation would be for.

The racists who murder people always end up voting for Democrats anyway. But I still wouldn't conclude that without support. Murderers lie and spin.

If that isn't what you were trying to ask, you'll have to take a fourth attempt. Just sit down and think your question through and write it as a complete, clear thought

I think my question was pretty damn clear. What’s your opinion and what is it based on? You answered though. And you gave the exact same answer as I gave. Can’t blindly believe a mass murderer. Need to review the facts and see how it plays out. Seems like common sense. A bunch of RW nutters have been trying to skewer me for expressing that opinion

 

[kaz]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

I wasn't picking on a typo, I didn't understand your first pass or second pass at asking the question.

Does what am I "basing" my opinion on mean? What opinion? I said he changes his view based on party. Clearly if he had said an answer he wanted, like it was racism, then there would be no intellectual wait a second, he'd start screaming it was Trump's fault.

What opinion are you asking about? Since this is the third time and you still can't ask a clear question, I'll guess you mean what would I base my view on whether it was racism, sex obsession or something else.

No matter what the murderer said, I wouldn't believe it without corroborating evidence. That's what the investigation would be for.

The racists who murder people always end up voting for Democrats anyway. But I still wouldn't conclude that without support. Murderers lie and spin.

If that isn't what you were trying to ask, you'll have to take a fourth attempt. Just sit down and think your question through and write it as a complete, clear thought

I think my question was pretty damn clear. What’s your opinion and what is it based on? You answered though. And you gave the exact same answer as I gave. Can’t blindly believe a mass murderer. Need to review the facts and see how it plays out. Seems like common sense. A bunch of RW nutters have been trying to skewer me for expressing that opinion

OK, so that's the part you failed on. I didn't express an opinion on the murderer, yet you kept asking what the opinion that I didn't mention was based on.

Let me guess, you went to government schools, didn't you?

And I didn't say whether I thought you would flip flop based on party. I said it to Occupied, who clearly would.

Here's how you could have stated it clearly.

So what's your opinion on why he said he committed the murder, kaz? And what if he had said it was because of race, would your answer be the same?

See how that work?

 

[Slade3200]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

I wasn't picking on a typo, I didn't understand your first pass or second pass at asking the question.

Does what am I "basing" my opinion on mean? What opinion? I said he changes his view based on party. Clearly if he had said an answer he wanted, like it was racism, then there would be no intellectual wait a second, he'd start screaming it was Trump's fault.

What opinion are you asking about? Since this is the third time and you still can't ask a clear question, I'll guess you mean what would I base my view on whether it was racism, sex obsession or something else.

No matter what the murderer said, I wouldn't believe it without corroborating evidence. That's what the investigation would be for.

The racists who murder people always end up voting for Democrats anyway. But I still wouldn't conclude that without support. Murderers lie and spin.

If that isn't what you were trying to ask, you'll have to take a fourth attempt. Just sit down and think your question through and write it as a complete, clear thought

I think my question was pretty damn clear. What’s your opinion and what is it based on? You answered though. And you gave the exact same answer as I gave. Can’t blindly believe a mass murderer. Need to review the facts and see how it plays out. Seems like common sense. A bunch of RW nutters have been trying to skewer me for expressing that opinion

OK, so that's the part you failed on. I didn't express an opinion on the murderer, yet you kept asking what the opinion that I didn't mention was based on.

Let me guess, you went to government schools, didn't you?

And I didn't say whether I thought you would flip flop based on party. I said it to Occupied, who clearly would.

Here's how you could have stated it clearly.

So what's your opinion on why he said he committed the murder, kaz? And what if he had said it was because of race, would your answer be the same?

See how that work?

Why do you need to express your opinion for me to ask what you base your opinion on?! You’re trying too hard to pick a fight.

 

[kaz]

Why are you taking the killer's word for why he did this? Can anyone just mention God and they are automatically truthful?

LOL, if he said he did it for a reason you wanted him too, this critical thinking you just suddenly discovered would be gone as fast as it appeared

What’s your critical thinking based on?

Your question can be interpreted in several ways. Can you clarify what you're asking me? Thanks

I mean it in the same way you referred to critical thinking in your post that I responded to.

Read the post again. Your question doesn't make sense. Ask it again as a complete thought.

I said he suddenly questioned a killer when they said he did it for a reason that doesn't help the left. I said that logic disappears when a killer says the reason he wants.

What does what is my critical thing based on mean? That doesn't make sense.

Are you a native English speaker?

Haha, if you are going to make fun of my English you should proof read your post before sending.

I was simply asking what you’re basing your opinions on about this situation. What narrative do you believe and why?

I wasn't picking on a typo, I didn't understand your first pass or second pass at asking the question.

Does what am I "basing" my opinion on mean? What opinion? I said he changes his view based on party. Clearly if he had said an answer he wanted, like it was racism, then there would be no intellectual wait a second, he'd start screaming it was Trump's fault.

What opinion are you asking about? Since this is the third time and you still can't ask a clear question, I'll guess you mean what would I base my view on whether it was racism, sex obsession or something else.

No matter what the murderer said, I wouldn't believe it without corroborating evidence. That's what the investigation would be for.

The racists who murder people always end up voting for Democrats anyway. But I still wouldn't conclude that without support. Murderers lie and spin.

If that isn't what you were trying to ask, you'll have to take a fourth attempt. Just sit down and think your question through and write it as a complete, clear thought

I think my question was pretty damn clear. What’s your opinion and what is it based on? You answered though. And you gave the exact same answer as I gave. Can’t blindly believe a mass murderer. Need to review the facts and see how it plays out. Seems like common sense. A bunch of RW nutters have been trying to skewer me for expressing that opinion

OK, so that's the part you failed on. I didn't express an opinion on the murderer, yet you kept asking what the opinion that I didn't mention was based on.

Let me guess, you went to government schools, didn't you?

And I didn't say whether I thought you would flip flop based on party. I said it to Occupied, who clearly would.

Here's how you could have stated it clearly.

So what's your opinion on why he said he committed the murder, kaz? And what if he had said it was because of race, would your answer be the same?

See how that work?

Why do you need to express your opinion for me to ask what you base your opinion on?! You’re trying too hard to pick a fight.

Strawman. I didn't say my opinion of the case in the post you responded to at all. Hence my confusion. You asked what I based my opinion on when I didn't give an opinion. If I had, it would have made sense