I didn't say anything of the sort: In fact what I did say was, " Whose fault this is doesn't really matter. Whether or not it is a result of nature or nurture really doesn't matter."
What I DID SAY was meant to convey that neither you (I suppose you are also white) or me, can easily imagine what it is like to be black in the USA. Because of our fortunate exclusion (ignorance?) it's easy for us to "call BULLSHIT."
Note that I do say "OUR," because I don't necessarily consider myself any better acquianted with being black than any other white, but I do recognise there is a difference.
With all due respect what I call bullshit is your opinion that black Americans can and/or should have a different world view than white Americans due to their ancestrial history. Fact is most all of the races of man were enslaved at some point in history.
The only difference is skin color and to think there is more to it than that is acknowledging and encouraging their victim mentality.
I don't encourage a "victim mentality."
Nor do I ignore the obvious: White Americans enslaved Black Americans, and now blacks comprise 60% of the prison population in America. I don't pretend to know exactly why.
But if I was black, I'd be more than a little paranoid, and the fact that whites were also enslaved 2000 years ago would not make much difference to me TODAY. I don't guess I'd be as paranoid as I would have been 50 years ago, but I wouldn't be completely at ease either.
I don't see how you can ignore the facts of history.
The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
In the rare instances when the ownership of slaves by free Negroes is acknowledged in the history books, justification centers on the claim that black slave masters were simply individuals who purchased the freedom of a spouse or child from a white slaveholder and had been unable to legally manumit them. Although this did indeed happen at times, it is a misrepresentation of the majority of instances, one which is debunked by records of the period on blacks who owned slaves. These include individuals such as Justus Angel and Mistress L. Horry, of Colleton District, South Carolina, who each owned 84 slaves in 1830. In fact, in 1830 a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more (2).
According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slaveholding states. Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
Black Slave Owners Civil War Article by Robert M Grooms
It seems you're relating the present prison population of blacks to slavery. Why?