Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

Trump is attacking anyone who ever testified against him

Biden is just protecting them from retribution
a pardon can only be issued AFTER the person has been tried and convicted. Biden's pardons will not stand up to a legal review, they are illegal. Will Bondi prosecute them? We shall see.
 
a pardon can only be issued AFTER the person has been tried and convicted. Biden's pardons will not stand up to a legal review, they are illegal. Will Bondi prosecute them? We shall see.

Once again, you show you don’t know what you are babbling about.
The Presidential Pardon is absolute
 
Your feelings are not reality.
Cornpop's senility is not reality.
fauci, milley, and Jan 6 committee are now recognized criminals.
bite me just proclaimed that.
by issuing pre-emptive pardons he declared them guilty but exempt from the law. No president has that authority (except maybe in North Korea)
 
Once again, you show you don’t know what you are babbling about.
The Presidential Pardon is absolute
a pre-emptive pardon is not a real legal action, it is a declaration of guilt with an attempt to shield the person from future prosecution. It is unconstitutional, and if challenged will not be upheld.
 
That makes absolutely no sense. Nothing Biden did inhibits Trump’s ability to offer pardons. There is no harm and therefore no standing.

The only way Trump could show harm is by telling the court he wants to prosecute someone but can’t due to an “unconstitutional” pardon.
I told you to tap out.

Trump took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. Biden shit all over the pardon power of the Constitution. Therefore, Trump has standing to right that wrong.

Seriously, you look dumber with every post.
 
I told you to tap out.

Trump took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. Biden shit all over the pardon power of the Constitution. Therefore, Trump has standing to right that wrong.

Seriously, you look dumber with every post.
If these people committed no crimes then the pardon is moot and there’s no wrong to right.

You want me to go away because you don’t like it when people show that you’re saying stupid shit.
 
If these people committed no crimes then the pardon is moot and there’s no wrong to right.

You want me to go away because you don’t like it when people show that you’re saying stupid shit.
Keep exposing your ignorance.

This is fun. :dance: :dance: :dance:
 
15th post
Keep exposing your ignorance.

This is fun. :dance: :dance: :dance:
Here’s how he gets standing.

Trump investigates his political opponent that received a preemptive pardon and files charges.

The opponent asks court to dismiss because they have a pardon.

Trump says the pardon is illegitimate and asks the court to declare it as such. It eventually works up to SCOTUS for a final decision.

That’s how this works.

Personally I think this is unlikely.
 
Here’s how he gets standing.

Trump investigates his political opponent that received a preemptive pardon and files charges.

The opponent asks court to dismiss because they have a pardon.

Trump says the pardon is illegitimate and asks the court to declare it as such. It eventually works up to SCOTUS for a final decision.

That’s how this works.

Personally I think this is unlikely.
He already has standing, stupid.

You get dumber with every post.
 
That's not the constitution. It's a link to a message board with a bunch of low information yahoos like yourself.

Where does the constitution specify that pardons are for crimes that are convicted?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom