Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

[Nostra]

That's not the constitution. It's a link to a message board with a bunch of low information yahoos like yourself.

Where does the constitution specify that pardons are for crimes that are convicted?

The link is in there. I posted it in response to your earlier dumbassery. Not my fault you are too fucking stupid to keep up with conversations you are in, Moroner.

 

[Marener]

He already has standing, stupid.

Not unless he can show harm.

In Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (90-1424), 504 U.S. 555 (1992) , the Supreme Court created a three-part test to determine whether a party has standing to sue:

• Injury in Fact : The plaintiff must have suffered an “injury in fact,” meaning that the injury is of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent.
• Causal Connection : There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct brought before the court.
• Redressability : It must be likely, rather than speculative, that a favorable decision by the court will redress the injury.

standing

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Marener]

The link is in there. I posted it in response to your earlier dumbassery. Not my fault you are too fucking stupid to keep up with conversations you are in, Moroner.

Link.

 

[SeaMajor7]

He was a criminal many times over, but you delusional lunatics made up stories to avoid admitting it.

BULLSHIT

 

[Marener]

BULLSHIT

I don't know. Seems like the FBI finding classified documents in your office drawer after you supposedly searched your entire house to turn anything over to the FBI seems like a big deal.

 

[Nostra]

Link.

 

[rightwinger]

Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

Now he pardoned Fauci and Milley. Pardoned from what? When have these people ever been convicted and sentenced for any crimes? Biden pardons Fauci and Milley in an effort to guard against potential ‘revenge’ by Trump "WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden has pardoned Dr. Anthony...

www.usmessageboard.com

Opinion, not an official source
Provide a legitimate link

 

[martybegan]

He was a criminal many times over, but you delusional lunatics made up stories to avoid admitting it.

Nope, all made up, all lawfare. And it's the reason why he ran again, and why Dems lost to him.

 

[Marener]

Link.

 

[rightwinger]

I don't know. Seems like the FBI finding classified documents in your office drawer after you supposedly searched your entire house to turn anything over to the FBI seems like a big deal.

What documents?
Judge Cannon says they no longer exist

 

[SeaMajor7]

I don't know. Seems like the FBI finding classified documents in your office drawer after you supposedly searched your entire house to turn anything over to the FBI seems like a big deal.

Yeah, Senator Biden shouldn't have taken those.
Too bad he wasn't president at the time he stolen them.
What a DUNCE.

 

[Marener]

Nope, all made up, all lawfare. And it's the reason why he ran again, and why Dems lost to him.

The problem you won't admit is that you had to make shit up in order to pretend like Trump didn't commit crimes.

It's why you claim all these other presidents have taken classified documents. You pretend it's true. You have to tell yourself it's true.

 

[Marener]

Yeah, Senator Biden shouldn't have taken those.
Too bad he wasn't president at the time he stolen them.
What a DUNCE.

When should we expect the Trump DoJ to indict him?

 

[martybegan]

The problem you won't admit is that you had to make shit up in order to pretend like Trump didn't commit crimes.

It's why you claim all these other presidents have taken classified documents. You pretend it's true. You have to tell yourself it's true.

Actually Dems had to make shit up to accuse him of crimes.

Biden took them when he was a Senator and a VP.

 

[rightwinger]

The link is in there. I posted it in response to your earlier dumbassery. Not my fault you are too fucking stupid to keep up with conversations you are in, Moroner.

You posted an opinion
Provide a link from a legitimate source

 

[konradv]

Federal pardons are for crimes against the United States, the DOJ would have standing to sue on behalf of the United States

The more likely thing is charging one of xiden’s criminal cabal with one of their many crimes, and they can claim the defense and litigate it

The president’s power is absolute. SCOTUS said so.

 

[martybegan]

The president’s power is absolute. SCOTUS said so.

On the merits of a Pardons. More to the point on the reason and issuance of one.

The question being asked now is what actually constitutes a pardon. That can be reviewed by the SC, and probably will be.

 

[Nostra]

You posted an opinion
Provide a link from a legitimate source

Already done, Trollwinger.

 

[Nostra]

Let’s recap……I have posted a link the clause in the Constitution that says a pardons is for those who commit “offenses against the United States. I have posted a link to the most recent Supreme Court ruling stating pardons cover people who are guilty of offenses against the United States.

I correctly pointed out Trump has standing to challenge Biden’s unconstitutional use of the pardon power due to the fact he took an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution.

Moroner and Trollwinger have brought this:

“Nuh-uh”.

You clowns can continue your trolling, but until one of you form a coherent thought I have no further use for you.

 

[Nostra]

The president’s power is absolute. SCOTUS said so.

Yes, for people guilty of offenses against the United States.