Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nonsense. You're failing your pom poms because you are convinced Biden and democrats got away with their sleaze and corruption.

I want Trump to be able to do the same thing when Democrats try their shit against this upcoming administration.

 

[Nostra]

They are all proven criminals now.

 

[martybegan]

He's old and fat, but I don't know who told you that he couldn't rifle through a filing box. I never said so.

What's pathetic is that you think you have a gotcha here.

Mishandling classified documents is a national security issue. Obviously.

It's a lot of boxes.

Nothing of the sort, just pointing out your "throw the spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks" approach to this topic.

Then why isn't Biden being prosecuted?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Only if they had been convicted in a court of law
When charges were dropped against Trump, they made it clear it was because of respect for the office of President, not for Trump himself

Was Trump accepting an admission of guilt?

Dropping charges in not a pardon, dumbass! Get back on topic!

 

[Hollie]

Where does it say that? Nixon was pardoned for unnamed offenses.

Clearly related to Watergate. That doesn't mean Ford was correct in doing so.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-5/ALDE_00013322/

"Despite the breadth of the President’s authority under the Pardon Clause, the Constitution’s text provides for at least two limits on the power: first, clemency may only be granted for Offenses against the United States,5 meaning that state criminal offenses and federal or state civil claims are not covered.6 Second, the President’s clemency authority cannot be used in Cases of impeachment.7"

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Pretty simple minded. A pardon is for offenses. Biden's blanket use of pardons describes no offenses to warrant those pardons.

Pardons for crimes to be named at a later date?

Exactly. And perfectly legal.

 

[Nostra]

I thought no one was above the law.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Clearly related to Watergate.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-5/ALDE_00013322/

"Despite the breadth of the President’s authority under the Pardon Clause, the Constitution’s text provides for at least two limits on the power: first, clemency may only be granted for Offenses against the United States,5 meaning that state criminal offenses and federal or state civil claims are not covered.6 Second, the President’s clemency authority cannot be used in Cases of impeachment.7"

No, it was not "clearly related to Watergate" except by assumption. You note that says "essay" in the URL. Try reading for comprehension, please.

 

[Marener]

It's a lot of boxes.

What's your point? Trump spent 4 years collecting piles of material. Having piles of shit everywhere is so of this thing. Load it up into boxes, ship it to Mar a Lago.

Nothing of the sort, just pointing out your "throw the spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks" approach to this topic.

That's what you're doing when you claim "other presidents do it" and all the other pathetic excuses you are coming up with.

Then why isn't Biden being prosecuted?

He could be once he leaves office. No one is saying that's not possible.

 

[Hollie]

Exactly. And perfectly legal.

Exactly not. Identify where the Comstitution provides for pre-emptive pardons.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Of course there is. Retroactive pardons for unnamed offenses are identified nowhere in the Constitution.

As I pointed out before, Ford pardoned Nixon.

 

[martybegan]

What's your point? Trump spent 4 years collecting piles of material. Having piles of shit everywhere is so of this thing. Load it up into boxes, ship it to Mar a Lago.

View attachment 1068078


That's what you're doing when you claim "other presidents do it" and all the other pathetic excuses you are coming up with.



He could be once he leaves office. No one is saying that's not possible.

In the end, it's all moot, because less than an hour, bottom bitch boi:

LOL, it won't happen.

Tick Tok, Tick Tok.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Exactly not. Identify where the Comstitution provides for pre-emptive pardons.

It doesn't. I also doesn't preclude them.

 

[martybegan]

As I pointed out before, Ford pardoned Nixon.

Weren't articles of impeachment under debate and ready for vote by the time Ford Pardoned Nixon?

 

[Hollie]

No, it was not "clearly related to Watergate" except by assumption. You note that says "essay" in the URL. Try reading for comprehension, please.

What other offenses was Nixon under investigation for.

You note you have no countering argument to the link. Try offering g something more than, "nuh ugh"

 

[Marener]

In the end, it's all moot, because less than an hour, bottom bitch boi:

In the end, this shows what a delusional partisan hack you are and that'll never change no matter who is president.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Prove me wrong Skipper

Done it many times and will do so many more. You are just ignorant of that fact, like many others.

 

[martybegan]

In the end, this shows what a delusional partisan hack you are and that'll never change no matter who is president.

What it shows is you idiot can't get out of your own way even when your tactics backfire fucking spectaculary.

You are like the dumb mice in the maze that found the electrified block of cheese.

OOOH CHEESE..,,..ZZZZAAPPP.....OOH CHEESE....>ZZZZAPPP...OOOH CHEESE....>ZZZAPPP

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Weren't articles of impeachment under debate and ready for vote by the time Ford Pardoned Nixon?

Impeachment does count. Remember? They are never voted on. Sorry! That's an epic fail.

 

[Nostra]

As I pointed out before, Ford pardoned Nixon.

That was for the crimes Nixon committed in the Watergate cover up.

Nixon Pardon | Gerald R. Ford

www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov