No it's not. We don't know why we're here and by what process. For you to assign that to an invisible superbeing automatically without actually knowing is quite simply wrong. Did you read that in a book? With a fantastical story about a 40 day worldwide flood?
Not exactly. Matter / anti matter annihilation began at the big bang. It took ~380,000 years for the "soup" to cool but the root cause was instantaneous. You lose again.No it's not, that's from something like 400,000 years after it.The CMB certainly is.None of that is data from the first moments of the BB. Please try again.I've gone over this a thousand times with you, Taz. CMB, red shift, super collider results, Einstein's field equations, inflation theory, quantum mechanics, FLoT, SLoT, and the expansion of the universe are all empirical evidence that the universe was created at the big bang.There's no empirical data from the beginning of the BB. I bet you want to cry.I don't know your answer to the question I asked.Why? You know everything?
And apparently you must not either.
Fact: we have no data from the first moments of the BB.If you had truth on your side you would argue facts, if you had reason on your side you would argue logic. but since you have neither, this is what you do.I bet that doesn't even make sense to you or your sock.
So the background is the remnant of something, not the start. Thanks for clearing that up.Not exactly. Matter / anti matter annihilation began at the big bang. It took ~380,000 years for the "soup" to cool but the root cause was instantaneous. You lose again.No it's not, that's from something like 400,000 years after it.The CMB certainly is.None of that is data from the first moments of the BB. Please try again.I've gone over this a thousand times with you, Taz. CMB, red shift, super collider results, Einstein's field equations, inflation theory, quantum mechanics, FLoT, SLoT, and the expansion of the universe are all empirical evidence that the universe was created at the big bang.There's no empirical data from the beginning of the BB. I bet you want to cry.I don't know your answer to the question I asked.Why? You know everything?
And apparently you must not either.
What was your degree in again?
Fact: we have no data from the first moments of the BB.If you had truth on your side you would argue facts, if you had reason on your side you would argue logic. but since you have neither, this is what you do.I bet that doesn't even make sense to you or your sock.
Logic: we can only guess at what's there. Inferring is still a guess.
CMB is landmark evidence of the Big Bang origin of the universe. When the universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and the radiation filling it grew cooler.So the background is the remnant of something, not the start. Thanks for clearing that up.Not exactly. Matter / anti matter annihilation began at the big bang. It took ~380,000 years for the "soup" to cool but the root cause was instantaneous. You lose again.No it's not, that's from something like 400,000 years after it.The CMB certainly is.None of that is data from the first moments of the BB. Please try again.I've gone over this a thousand times with you, Taz. CMB, red shift, super collider results, Einstein's field equations, inflation theory, quantum mechanics, FLoT, SLoT, and the expansion of the universe are all empirical evidence that the universe was created at the big bang.There's no empirical data from the beginning of the BB. I bet you want to cry.I don't know your answer to the question I asked.Why? You know everything?
And apparently you must not either.
What was your degree in again?
en.wikipedia.org
From your link "What is the Big Bang theory?" Do you know what a theory is?Fact: we have no data from the first moments of the BB.If you had truth on your side you would argue facts, if you had reason on your side you would argue logic. but since you have neither, this is what you do.I bet that doesn't even make sense to you or your sock.
Logic: we can only guess at what's there. Inferring is still a guess.
It's not data from the first moments of the BB, I'm talking about say, the first 5 seconds. The CMB is a remnant of that but does not describe it.. Gawd, you're stoopid.CMB is landmark evidence of the Big Bang origin of the universe. When the universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and the radiation filling it grew cooler.So the background is the remnant of something, not the start. Thanks for clearing that up.Not exactly. Matter / anti matter annihilation began at the big bang. It took ~380,000 years for the "soup" to cool but the root cause was instantaneous. You lose again.No it's not, that's from something like 400,000 years after it.The CMB certainly is.None of that is data from the first moments of the BB. Please try again.I've gone over this a thousand times with you, Taz. CMB, red shift, super collider results, Einstein's field equations, inflation theory, quantum mechanics, FLoT, SLoT, and the expansion of the universe are all empirical evidence that the universe was created at the big bang.There's no empirical data from the beginning of the BB. I bet you want to cry.I don't know your answer to the question I asked.Why? You know everything?
And apparently you must not either.
What was your degree in again?
.Cosmic microwave background - Wikipedia
From your link "What is the Big Bang theory?" Do you know what a theory is?Fact: we have no data from the first moments of the BB.If you had truth on your side you would argue facts, if you had reason on your side you would argue logic. but since you have neither, this is what you do.I bet that doesn't even make sense to you or your sock.
Logic: we can only guess at what's there. Inferring is still a guess.
Speaking only for myself, I see science and religion, not so much as mutually exclusive, but just concerned with different issues. Are music and history mutually exclusive or just different?
WMAP Big Bang CMB Test
Public access site for The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and associated information about cosmology.wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov
It's not data from the first moments of the BB, I'm talking about say, the first 5 seconds. The CMB is a remnant of that but does not describe it.. Gawd, you're stoopid.CMB is landmark evidence of the Big Bang origin of the universe. When the universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and the radiation filling it grew cooler.So the background is the remnant of something, not the start. Thanks for clearing that up.Not exactly. Matter / anti matter annihilation began at the big bang. It took ~380,000 years for the "soup" to cool but the root cause was instantaneous. You lose again.No it's not, that's from something like 400,000 years after it.The CMB certainly is.None of that is data from the first moments of the BB. Please try again.I've gone over this a thousand times with you, Taz. CMB, red shift, super collider results, Einstein's field equations, inflation theory, quantum mechanics, FLoT, SLoT, and the expansion of the universe are all empirical evidence that the universe was created at the big bang.There's no empirical data from the beginning of the BB. I bet you want to cry.I don't know your answer to the question I asked.Why? You know everything?
And apparently you must not either.
What was your degree in again?
.Cosmic microwave background - Wikipedia
www.bbc.co.uk
WMAP Big Bang CMB Test
Public access site for The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and associated information about cosmology.
Quote the part that describes the first 5 seconds of the BB. You can't. So you lose. Asswipe.
getyarn.io
