Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,245
- 99,375
- 3,645
HahahahaNo one is going to waste their time writing a paper refuting YOUR idea because NO ONE shares it with you.
Poor ding.
So entitled.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HahahahaNo one is going to waste their time writing a paper refuting YOUR idea because NO ONE shares it with you.
Crick's own posts convict him.Hahahaha
Poor ding.
So entitled.
Here is one paper investigating the possibility that they are due to the collapse of thermohaline circulation (THC) known in the Atlantic Ocean as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). High salinity water in North Atlantic cools and as it approaches maximum density (4C) it sinks several kilometers. A slow bottom flow then proceeds south and at the equator runs into a mirror image current coming from the southern pole. The two rise, bringing large amounts of dissolved nutrients to the surface at the equator. Warmed water slowly flows north (and south) to close the two loops. There is very little of such flow in the Pacific due to the low salinity of the water in the North Pacific. Even cooled to maximum density, it is not driven to sink. The difference between the behavior of the two basins has been recreated in a wide range of models. But there are strong indications that the current situation in the Atlantic is unstable and that it could be stopped altogether by a large input of fresh water, from melting ice in the Arctic and Greenland. Since this flow is responsible for the moderate temperature in Europe, the result would be catastrophic cooling there. That info is from the paper's abstract. Visit the link if you want more.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.97.4.1347 [PNAS = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]
Here is another paper that reports on an spontaneous abrupt cooling that took place in a high resolution model with sensitive sea-ice modelling. The cooling lasted approximately one century and stopped as abruptly as it had started. I'll let them explain: "The event was simulated in the preindustrial control run of a high-resolution climate model, without imposing external perturbations. Initial cooling started with a period of enhanced atmospheric blocking over the eastern subpolar gyre. In response, a southward progression of the sea-ice margin occurred, and the sea-level pressure anomaly was locked to the sea-ice margin through thermal forcing. The cold-core high steered more cold air to the area, reinforcing the sea-ice concentration anomaly east of Greenland. The sea-ice surplus was carried southward by ocean currents around the tip of Greenland. South of 70°N, sea ice already started melting and the associated freshwater anomaly was carried to the Labrador Sea, shutting off deep convection. There, surface waters were exposed longer to atmospheric cooling and sea surface temperature dropped, causing an even larger thermally forced high above the Labrador Sea. In consequence, east of Greenland, anomalous winds changed from north to south, terminating the event with similar abruptness to its onset" https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1304912110
Here is a third paper that points out that "complex environmental systems are never in equilibrium" being constantly driven by oscillating inputs such as seasonal cycles, Milankovitch forcing and internal climate oscillations (ENSO, PDO, etc). This is a broader discussion than just the interglacial cycle but it does point out that under non-equilibrium conditions it is possible to have multiple alternative pseudo-stable states under identical forcing conditions between which a system can be "tipped" by small changes in external forcing. Abrupt Climate Change in an Oscillating World - Scientific Reports [Nature magazine]
They do not. If you disagree, point out the specific text that you believe support your claims.Crick's own posts convict him.
Ummm the part where you said the collapse of the AMOC would lead to CATASTROPHIC COOLING.They do not. If you disagree, point out the specific text that you believe support your claims.
Why not just start cutting yourself with a rusty spoon? It will be more fun and just as productive.They do not. If you disagree, point out the specific text that you believe support your claims.
I know it's a shock to you that the largest feature on the planet is responsible for the planet's climate, but I assure you they already know.Why not just start cutting yourself with a rusty spoon? It will be more fun and just as productive.
Ding is challenged to publish his work, or stfu and go sit in the corner with the alien abductees and the spoonbenders. Those are the rules.
Unless that's the snide and very immature opening of your published abstract...I know it's a shock to you that the largest feature on the planet is responsible for the planet's climate, but I assure you they already know.
That's because this is political for you. There is no evidence you will accept.Unless that's the snide and very immature opening of your published abstract...
... not interested.
Except the peer review of your published science, as stated explicitly to you many times.That's because this is political for you. There is no evidence you will accept.
You reject the published science that doesn't agree with your political agenda.Except the peer review of your published science, as stated explicitly to you many times.
If you couldn't lie, you wouldn't have much else to say.
As i said... if you couldn't lie, you wouldn't have much to say.You reject the published science that doesn't agree with your political agenda.
Bring them on. Let's find out.I don't think ding's tactic of nipping at the ankles of people smarter than him is going to get him anywhere, in the world of published, peer-reviewed science.
Feel free to reject this, ya political hack.I don't think ding's tactic of nipping at the ankles of people smarter than him is going to get him anywhere, in the world of published, peer-reviewed science.
The work is so well known and understood that Dave Borlace did a video on it, ya idiot.Now, publish your work for peer review.
Otherwise... not interested. No normal human should or would be interested.
It's just so simple.
You mean like this paper?Now, publish your work for peer review.
Otherwise... not interested. No normal human should or would be interested.
It's just so simple.
Nice paper. Nature just don't print shit. I'm working on it. Just found " Although we make no explicit assumptions, the primary driver of climate change, the logarithm of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, does, in fact, increase close to linearly with time in the industrial period29. "You mean like this paper?
![]()
Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation - Nature Communications
The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is a major tipping element in the climate system. Here, data-driven estimators for the time of tipping predict a potential AMOC collapse mid-century under the current emission scenario.www.nature.com
I use lots of those guys papers. I can't help if they get that part wrong. That's not the part I'm using. Those guys probably forgot to check when the warming trend began which was 400 years ago or 250 years before man's emission could have cause that warming.Nice paper. Nature just don't print shit. I'm working on it. Just found " Although we make no explicit assumptions, the primary driver of climate change, the logarithm of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, does, in fact, increase close to linearly with time in the industrial period29. "
The Nature article was from July 2023. That idiotic graph is from 28 years prior. Do you actually think they had better data back then? And why would you use a graph covering 11,000 years to see events at 400 and 250 years back?I use lots of those guys papers. I can't help if they get that part wrong. That's not the part I'm using. Those guys probably forgot to check when the warming trend began which was 400 years ago or 250 years before man's emission could have cause that warming.
View attachment 986000