Arabs get back West Bank land!!!

The Jews could have stayed in Europe or gone to North America.

The Jews from Muslim lands were the only ones expelled, and only half of them were expelled. They could have also gone to France and other European states.

My mom's family could not have stayed in Poland after the war. The Poles blamed the Jews for what the Germans did to them. My grandfather's neighbors warned him to get out, because Jews were getting attacked in the streets by Poles. My mom's family applied for visas to America, but they were denied. So they went to Israel.

What did the Palestinians have to do with all that?
They're catalysts, Punkin.
 
These Arabs should sue the Israelis for back-rent for the illegal use of their land.
 
These Arabs should sue the Israelis for back-rent for the illegal use of their land.

These Arabs should be happy that Israel has not finished what was thrust upon them by Arabs in 1948. But, then I am a "take no prisoners" kind of guy.

Ramla_prisoners_of_war,_July_12-13,_1948.png



Arab forces surrender to Israel in 1948 in Ramia.
Speaking as a WASP, Independent voter, I think Israel has been way to generous to Arabs.​
 
Israel should stop stealing private property.

It will bite them in the end.
 
Of course they aren't, they're squatters, invaders from neighboring Arab lands.

That is a lie.

Most Palestinians have history going back in Palestine for centuries.

Most Israelis have history going back in Palestine maybe 2 generations. They are the invaders.

Liberate Palestine!!
Palestinians are the newest of all the peoples on the face of the Earth, and began to exist in a single day by a kind of supernatural phenomenon that is unique in the whole history of mankind.

“Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?”
“We did not particularly mind Jordanian rule. The teaching of the destruction of Israel was a definite part of the curriculum, but we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians - they removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag”.
“When I finally realized the lies and myths I was taught, it is my duty as a righteous person to speak out”.

This declaration by a true "Palestinian" should have some significance for a sincerely neutral observer. Indeed, there is no such a thing like a Palestinian people, or a Palestinian culture, or a Palestinian language, or a Palestinian history. There has never been any Palestinian state, neither any Palestinian archaeological find nor coinage. The present-day "Palestinians" are an Arab people, with Arab culture, Arabic language and Arab history. They have their own Arab states from where they came into the Land of Israel about one century ago to contrast the Jewish immigration. That is the historical truth. They were Jordanians (another recent British invention, as there has never been any people known as "Jordanians"), and after the Six-Day War in which Israel utterly defeated the coalition of nine Arab states and took legitimate possession of Judea and Samaria, the Arab dwellers in those regions underwent a kind of anthropological miracle and discovered that they were Palestinians - something they did not know the day before. Of course, these people having a new identity had to build themselves a history, namely, had to steal some others' history, and the only way that the victims of the theft would not complain is if those victims do no longer exist.
 
Recognition is a political move. It does not change legal status. Israel claims borders on land that it has never legally acquired.

The United Nations decides what is and is not, legal.

deal with it.

It is just a political recognition. The UN recently recognized Palestine a state. What does that mean besides nothing? The UN recognizes Israel a state. What does that mean besides the same nothing?

Even the UN's own map of Israel has disclaimers on legal status, territory, and borders.

0.84
Yes, that would be AFTER Jordan was supposed to be Palestine, and the Arabs didn't accept and then attacked Israel, and what you see is the aftermath of Arab aggression and attack. Not that they learned their lesson. Apparently one humiliating defeat after another came afterwards. Very low learning curve,mine might say.

How is it that the Arabs got to ask for a MUSLIMS ONLY state in Jordan? Racism, apartheid, anyone? <LOL>

1920-boundaryconventionmap.jpg


truncatedmap.jpg
 
Last edited:

The Palestine Mandate, Balfour Declaration, and San Remo Conference says nothing about a Jewish state.

Just a Jewish homeland.

Also, the United States recognized the West Bank as "Arab Palestine".
 
I just finished Googling eight websites on this subject. The most balanced report seemed to be in Wiki. West Bank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Palestinians and Jews have been fighting over the Westbank for centuries, and each side has some good points.

Not true. There were virtually no hostilities all during the Ottoman period.

However, in the end Israel was invaded by Arabs in 1948,

Not true. The Arab countries entered Palestine and fought Israeli forces in Palestine.

but won the war and took the land.

Not true. The war was stopped by UN Security Council resolution. Nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

There is little difference between what the Jews did to the Palestinians, and America did by winning the Mexican-American War in 1848. Neither issue is really satisfied, but in the end, "possession is 9/10s of the law." And, "he who wins the war, writes the history."
 

The Palestine Mandate, Balfour Declaration, and San Remo Conference says nothing about a Jewish state.

Just a Jewish homeland.

Also, the United States recognized the West Bank as "Arab Palestine".
Palestine mandate included a Jewish Palestine, aka ISRAEL, and an Arab Palestine, aka Jordan. Arabs rejected that, attacked Israel, and then you have that map showing the results of the Arab aggression. They then controlled the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, without a peep from anybody anybody, not the Arab occupiers, and not the so called Palestinians, even mentioning the words "Palestine" or "Palestinians" and in fact used the same lands they occupied in the map of their aggression, to attack Israel once more in 1967, and 1973.

Get the story straight. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, three, four, five times shame on me? Ha ha ha. Ain't gonna happen.
 
Last edited:
I just finished Googling eight websites on this subject. The most balanced report seemed to be in Wiki. West Bank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Palestinians and Jews have been fighting over the Westbank for centuries, and each side has some good points.

Not true. There were virtually no hostilities all during the Ottoman period.

However, in the end Israel was invaded by Arabs in 1948,

Not true. The Arab countries entered Palestine and fought Israeli forces in Palestine.

but won the war and took the land.

Not true. The war was stopped by UN Security Council resolution. Nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

There is little difference between what the Jews did to the Palestinians, and America did by winning the Mexican-American War in 1848. Neither issue is really satisfied, but in the end, "possession is 9/10s of the law." And, "he who wins the war, writes the history."
Hey tinny boy, guess who's controlling those lands now? ISRAEL. Deal with with it. That's the way of the world. If Arabs truly wanted peace, and not the destruction of Israel to be replaced by a second Arab Jew-free Palestine, they would have a state a long time ago.
 
Palestine mandate included a Jewish Palestine, aka ISRAEL, and an Arab Palestine, aka Jordan. Arabs rejected that, attacked Israel, and then you have that map showing the results of the Arab aggression. They then controlled the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, without a peep from anybody anybody, not the Arab occupiers, and not the so called Palestinians, even mentioning the words "Palestine" or "Palestinians" and in fact used the same lands they occupied in the map of their aggression, to attack Israel once more in 1967, and 1973.

Get the story straight. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, three, four, five times shame on me? Ha ha ha. Ain't gonna happen.

The Palestine Mandate, Balfour Declaration, and San Remo Conference said nothing about a "Jewish Palestine".
 
Palestine mandate included a Jewish Palestine, aka ISRAEL, and an Arab Palestine, aka Jordan. Arabs rejected that, attacked Israel, and then you have that map showing the results of the Arab aggression. They then controlled the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, without a peep from anybody anybody, not the Arab occupiers, and not the so called Palestinians, even mentioning the words "Palestine" or "Palestinians" and in fact used the same lands they occupied in the map of their aggression, to attack Israel once more in 1967, and 1973.

Get the story straight. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, three, four, five times shame on me? Ha ha ha. Ain't gonna happen.

The Palestine Mandate, Balfour Declaration, and San Remo Conference said nothing about a "Jewish Palestine".
Those old, ancient documents still in effect?
 
Those old, ancient documents still in effect?

Neo-Zionists are notorious for claiming that the promises to the Jews made in these documents, are still in affect.
 
Those old, ancient documents still in effect?

Neo-Zionists are notorious for claiming that the promises to the Jews made in these documents, are still in affect.
Neo nazis and Islamifacists (is there a difference?) are notorious for making up lies about the true history of Palestine.
 
Neo nazis and Islamifacists (is there a difference?) are notorious for making up lies about the true history of Palestine.

what is the "true" history of Palestine?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom