April 9, 1865

Except for how black soldiers were treated if they surrendered.

And thats probably the only reason. When dealing with other enemies we teneded to just wipe them out in the 1800s.

We didn't wipe out anyone. we just stole their land with bullshit treaties.

Don't over-exaggerate bad behavior.
 
And sent them to concentration camp reservations where they died en masse.

Concentration camps were invented by the British for use against the Boers.

There were deaths, but not en masse.
 
Concentration camps were invented by the British for use against the Boers.

There were deaths, but not en masse.
Don't tell them that. How many Comanche survived? How many Lakotah, Cherokee?

If we followed standard policy we would have driven the entire SOuthern population into small camps, and then repopulated it with good patriotic American immigrants.
 
Don't tell them that. How many Comanche survived? How many Lakotah, Cherokee?

How many were there to begin with?

Europeans were also still subjugating each other during this period.

Hell Russia didn't get rid of its serfs until the late 1800's.
 
How many were there to begin with?
Depends on the tribe.
Europeans were also still subjugating each other during this period.
Still are. Irrelevant.

Hell Russia didn't get rid of its serfs until the late 1800's.
Irrelevant.

Back to the topic. In reading about their powwow, the major concern of Lee was for his men to get food as they were starving, and keep their horses. Considering they were not under a siege or otherwise starved out that really speaks to the poor state of affairs of the Army of Virginia.
 
Depends on the tribe.

Still are. Irrelevant.


Irrelevant.

Back to the topic. In reading about their powwow, the major concern of Lee was for his men to get food as they were starving, and keep their horses. Considering they were not under a siege or otherwise starved out that really speaks to the poor state of affairs of the Army of Virginia.

All relevant. Sorry, but pretending that bad things only happened in war and conquest to brown people when it comes to white people is revisionist bullshit. Europeans were perfectly fine with warring with other whites, they just had a tech and organizational advantage against non-whites.

They had just left a siege, Petersburg, and were forced to maneuver. They were simply out of space, resources and time.
 
All relevant.
None of it is relevant to the topic.

Sorry, but pretending that bad things only happened in war and conquest to brown people when it comes to white people is revisionist bullshit.
I didn't say that. You posted that. I have no problem with how the US Army acted in the past, well I have issues with their procurement of rifles post Civil War and lack of training, but thats a personal peeve.


Europeans were perfectly fine with warring with other whites, they just had a tech and organizational advantage against non-whites.
Thats awesome and irrelevant.

They had just left a siege, Petersburg, and were forced to maneuver. They were simply out of space, resources and time.
Because they were stupid and decided to pick the side God was against.
 
None of it is relevant to the topic.


I didn't say that. You posted that. I have no problem with how the US Army acted in the past, well I have issues with their procurement of rifles post Civil War and lack of training, but thats a personal peeve.



Thats awesome and irrelevant.


Because they were stupid and decided to pick the side God was against.

it's relevant to the claim that we didn't massacre the rebs but massacred everyone else in the 1800's.
 
it's relevant to the claim that we didn't massacre the rebs but massacred everyone else in the 1800's.
Then I shall clarify: I meant that we typically were very rough on opponents. I didn't say it was racism. I show it as an example of what could have happened, and would more likely happen in a modern civil war.
 
Then I shall clarify: I meant that we typically were very rough on opponents. I didn't say it was racism. I show it as an example of what could have happened, and would more likely happen in a modern civil war.

LOL, The Russians vs. The Germans and vice versa in WWII was far rougher than anything Americans have done in their entire history.

We still actually took Japanese prisoners if we could, and treated them the same as other POWs. Neither the Germans or Russians did the same for each other, and yet the Germans played fair with Americans and the British.

Hell the Russians kept some of their POWs until the 1950's.
 
The ACW was uncommonly civil for a civil war.
Maybe so to a certain extent through 1863. In 1864 and 1865, the combat was brutal and would be repeated on a much larger scale 50 years later in WW1. Prisoner exchanges didn't happen much after 1863 and the prisons on both sides became uncivil at best.
 
Interesting guy to follow.
A much more interesting guy to follow-on the topic of Appomattox:



this is good too:

Plus you can watch it in the background while working.
 
Back
Top Bottom