Apples To Apples

[Harpy Eagle]

And notice if you will that-------------> a whole bunch of the 51% against him are in CA and NY, lol. We will give the Left those 2 states-)

I keep bringing this up, but so far, nobody from either side of the aisle seems interested---------------->polls show that depending upon who/whom the Left nominates, ILLINOIS would be in play!

Now, if that doesn't send a shiver down the backs of Leftists, I don't know what will, and YES, polling says that statement is true!

And remember when we mentioned Penn, WI, and Michigan last cycle, the Left told us--------> no way Jose-)

The Dems are not at all worried there will be a 17 point swing in Ill, you are fucking on drugs.

Nope, not at all. Notice I said--------> depending upon who the nominee is.

I am not trying to mislead you, honestly. Wait and see who the nominee is, and if your side chooses wrong, watch the magic numbers change dramatically. You can then come back and proclaim...………….ok, I get it now!

I live in Illinois, it does not matter if they put up Felix the Cat, Trump is not going to win the state, Cook county is just too big and they will vote Dem no matter what.

By the way, this is my side...Libertarian Party...do try and keep up.

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

 

[SAYIT]

The Dems are not at all worried there will be a 17 point swing in Ill, you are fucking on drugs.

Nope, not at all. Notice I said--------> depending upon who the nominee is.

I am not trying to mislead you, honestly. Wait and see who the nominee is, and if your side chooses wrong, watch the magic numbers change dramatically. You can then come back and proclaim...………….ok, I get it now!

I live in Illinois, it does not matter if they put up Felix the Cat, Trump is not going to win the state, Cook county is just too big and they will vote Dem no matter what.

By the way, this is my side...Libertarian Party...do try and keep up.

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nope, not at all. Notice I said--------> depending upon who the nominee is.

I am not trying to mislead you, honestly. Wait and see who the nominee is, and if your side chooses wrong, watch the magic numbers change dramatically. You can then come back and proclaim...………….ok, I get it now!

I live in Illinois, it does not matter if they put up Felix the Cat, Trump is not going to win the state, Cook county is just too big and they will vote Dem no matter what.

By the way, this is my side...Libertarian Party...do try and keep up.

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

 

[SAYIT]

I live in Illinois, it does not matter if they put up Felix the Cat, Trump is not going to win the state, Cook county is just too big and they will vote Dem no matter what.

By the way, this is my side...Libertarian Party...do try and keep up.

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

 

[imawhosure]

And notice if you will that-------------> a whole bunch of the 51% against him are in CA and NY, lol. We will give the Left those 2 states-)

I keep bringing this up, but so far, nobody from either side of the aisle seems interested---------------->polls show that depending upon who/whom the Left nominates, ILLINOIS would be in play!

Now, if that doesn't send a shiver down the backs of Leftists, I don't know what will, and YES, polling says that statement is true!

And remember when we mentioned Penn, WI, and Michigan last cycle, the Left told us--------> no way Jose-)

The Dems are not at all worried there will be a 17 point swing in Ill, you are fucking on drugs.

Nope, not at all. Notice I said--------> depending upon who the nominee is.

I am not trying to mislead you, honestly. Wait and see who the nominee is, and if your side chooses wrong, watch the magic numbers change dramatically. You can then come back and proclaim...………….ok, I get it now!

I live in Illinois, it does not matter if they put up Felix the Cat, Trump is not going to win the state, Cook county is just too big and they will vote Dem no matter what.

By the way, this is my side...Libertarian Party...do try and keep up.

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

This state was won by 17% last election, that is not going to change in 4 years. I do not live in Cook county, I live down south in the ignored part of the state.

There is no such thing as a poll scientist, but I am not surprised you do not know that.

Yes there is, lol. I too am surprised you didn't know that.

Hey, believe what you want. No skin off my nose either way. I can see why you would have confidence in your position, and yet...……………….you are looking at it 2 dimensional instead of 3 dimensional.

Your position is-------------------->there is NO WAY Trump can win in Illinois, because he can't flip enough votes.

GUESS WHAT, I agree!

POLL SCIENTISTS POSITION------------> If the Democrats choose the wrong candidate, then enough DEMOCRATS will stay home in Illinois to FLIP the state, as it is expected that 80 to 90% of GOPers will show at the polls.

Does that explain it better for you?

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

3 years ago this week the Gallup poll found Trump's approval at 40% and now finds it at 49%, higher than was Obama's after 3 years in office.

Trump approval rating hits new high in Gallup poll, despite impeachment trial

Trump Approval Rating Today: Where Gallup and other polls have the president now

Not surprising, UE was still above 8% and the markets had not yet made back all the lost during the recession.

So you admit our peace & prosperity with Trump as POTUS have a bearing on his popularity? Can it be that CNN's Van Jones has it right:

Van Jones: Let's Be Real, None of These Democrats Can Beat Trump

Well of course the economy has a bearing, it is always about the economy.

And I do agree barring some weird thing in the next few months the Dems have no chance to beat Trump, incumbents just do not lose that often.

Never been an incumbent impeached in his first term either.

Which has increased his popularity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[22lcidw]

Well of course the economy has a bearing, it is always about the economy. And I do agree barring some weird thing in the next few months the Dems have no chance to beat Trump, incumbents just do not lose that often.

Never been an incumbent impeached in his first term either.

And despite that silly impeachment - or perhaps because of it - Trump's approval is at its highest point. What do you make of that?

BTW, as if the unhinged House Dems haven't already done enough for Trump they haven't ruled out doing it again, proving that we just can't fix Dem stupidity.

Van Jones: Let's Be Real, None of These Democrats Can Beat Trump

Only silly because REAL evidence and those under subpoena were NOT allowed to participate. How can you have a trial with no witnesses or documents allowed?

That is because there should not have been an impeachment at all.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes there is, lol. I too am surprised you didn't know that.

No, there is not. Such a thing does not exist. There are data scientist (I know, as I am one) and there are survey statisticians, but there is no such thing as a poll scientist.

POLL SCIENTISTS POSITION------------> If the Democrats choose the wrong candidate, then enough DEMOCRATS will stay home in Illinois to FLIP the state, as it is expected that 80 to 90% of GOPers will show at the polls.

Does that explain it better for you?

Provide a link to this. I think you are full of shit.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I don't care where you live, lol. You are so confidant, then ask Governor Quinn how that all happened.

Now, you don't have to believe it from your Cook County seat of power; and in fact it is probably better for us if you don't! But scientifically, polls say that your state is within the margin of error...…….ergo up for grabs...…..if your side picks the wrong person.

You don't like the science of it? Sorry, go argue with the poll scientists and not me-)

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

 

[imawhosure]

Yes there is, lol. I too am surprised you didn't know that.

No, there is not. Such a thing does not exist. There are data scientist (I know, as I am one) and there are survey statisticians, but there is no such thing as a poll scientist.

POLL SCIENTISTS POSITION------------> If the Democrats choose the wrong candidate, then enough DEMOCRATS will stay home in Illinois to FLIP the state, as it is expected that 80 to 90% of GOPers will show at the polls.

Does that explain it better for you?

Provide a link to this. I think you are full of shit.

Now you want a link, lol!

Sorry, it is internal and proprietary. As a data collector, I am sure you are well aware of this; but oh by the way, the Trump Administration is not-)

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes there is, lol. I too am surprised you didn't know that.

No, there is not. Such a thing does not exist. There are data scientist (I know, as I am one) and there are survey statisticians, but there is no such thing as a poll scientist.

POLL SCIENTISTS POSITION------------> If the Democrats choose the wrong candidate, then enough DEMOCRATS will stay home in Illinois to FLIP the state, as it is expected that 80 to 90% of GOPers will show at the polls.

Does that explain it better for you?

Provide a link to this. I think you are full of shit.

Now you want a link, lol!

Sorry, it is internal and proprietary. As a data collector, I am sure you are well aware of this; but oh by the way, the Trump Administration is not-)

Thanks for admitting you are just making shit up.

I accept your surrender.

 

[eddiew]

All depends on turnout and less suppression of the vote Large turnout Dems have a good chance to win presidency and take back senate imho

 

[imawhosure]

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

Rather than use polls, Moody's and others employ scientific models to predict the future and every one I've read says Trump in 2020 ... BIGLY. No wonder the Dems were and still are so hot to impeach.

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that
According to Moody’s Analytics, Trump is headed toward another four years in the White House. And, if the numbers are right, it won’t even be close.
Earlier scientific modelers came to the same conclusion as Moody's.

3 forecast modelers predict Trump will win in 2020
The big picture: Trump wins all three modelers. Economists predict that the tailwind is large.

• Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, "found that the growth rates of gross domestic product and inflation have been the two most important economic predictors — but he also found that incumbency was also an important determinant of presidential election outcomes."
• "Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them."
• "Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College."

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

These same modelers predicted a Hillary victory...how did that work out for them?

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

 

[imawhosure]

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

Fair enough but Moody's accurately predicted every other presidential election in the last 40 years, so there's that.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

 

[eddiew]

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

As I said earlier, I have no doubt Trump will win, but this idea he will win like Reagan did in 84 is just stupid. We are not going to see 15 to 17 percentage point swings in states, Trump has not increased his base much at all.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

With friends like you we don't need any enemies

 

[imawhosure]

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

I disagree and if Sanders emerges as the Dem candidate we could see 1972 redux.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

With friends like you we don't need any enemies

I am NOT your friend, but that doesn't mean I can't help BERNARD and his crew. We want to give you EXACTLY what you want, a BERNARD nomination!

 

[eddiew]

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit
Me too Golfing, that is why I urge you to come heout of most people.

Sanders has a larger young person following than any other candidate. I think Sanders would surprise the shit out of most people.

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

With friends like you we don't need any enemies

I am NOT your friend, but that doesn't mean I can't help BERNARD and his crew. We want to give you EXACTLY what you want, a BERNARD nomination!

You serving arsenic with that?

 

[imawhosure]

Me too Golfing, that is why I am urging you to help me push BERNARD. Go here-------->BERNIE, BERNIE, BERNIE----->Operation chaos, 2.0!

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

With friends like you we don't need any enemies

I am NOT your friend, but that doesn't mean I can't help BERNARD and his crew. We want to give you EXACTLY what you want, a BERNARD nomination!

You serving arsenic with that?

BERNARD for DNC nominee! Come on Bernie Bro's, who is with me!

And for those who aren't...……………..what are you, against old people!

 

[eddiew]

Shows just how unsure of your god in the White House that you people are. If you were so sure of your god you would not need to resort to such things.

I am not resorting to anything, lol. I am trying to "hep" the Bernie Bro's, and what is wrong with that?

Geeze, trying to "hep" fellow Americans is now seen as bad. What the heck is this country coming to-)

With friends like you we don't need any enemies

I am NOT your friend, but that doesn't mean I can't help BERNARD and his crew. We want to give you EXACTLY what you want, a BERNARD nomination!

You serving arsenic with that?

BERNARD for DNC nominee! Come on Bernie Bro's, who is with me!

And for those who aren't...……………..what are you, against old people!

Russia,can you hear me ? Help trump again