Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Nice rant, do you feel better? Care to address the topic?
I want to see them try to do it.
They aren't finished making total asses of themselves yet.
You don't know what precedent means either, or you would not be stupid enough to make such ridiculous claims, just like AOC, Collins, and Manchin. They did not lie just because you don't understand.Kav and Gor seemed to have crossed the line into perjury. The others fell short of that.
Thomas, of course, should be impeached for rank corruption. His wife takes millions in lobbyist money, and donors know they're buying the vote of her husband. They're a couple, so he shares in that money. He's literally the most corrupt justice in US history.
Needless to say, that sort of corruption thrills every conservative here. They want every justice to be on the take like Thomas.
more like a train load of anvils
I call her "Donkey Chompers".Have you seen her teeth, it's why she can't shut her mouth
Well wait, what’s theDo any of these bitches have a tit shot? That would actually be contributory.
These loons want impeachment as the tool for whenever lawful rulings and facts don’t match their feelings.
Really? Show us where they said how they would rule on a case that came before them?Kav and Gor seemed to have crossed the line into perjury. The others fell short of that.
Thomas, of course, should be impeached for rank corruption. His wife takes millions in lobbyist money, and donors know they're buying the vote of her husband. They're a couple, so he shares in that money. He's literally the most corrupt justice in US history.
Needless to say, that sort of corruption thrills every conservative here. They want every justice to be on the take like Thomas.
Where did they lie under oath?AOC is usually to much of a crackpot for me but she does bring up a good point. SCOTUS judges are not above the law and above consequence. If they lied or misled or commit crimes etc then they can be impeached, correct? The question is, Where do we draw the line?
Didn’t think so
None of the justices said Roe could not be overturned. You are lying....again. Stare Decisis is not an inexorable command. When a prior decision is unworkable or badly reasoned, Stare Decisis may not be applied and the court may not follow precedent.And appropriately so – they lied while under oath during their confirmation hearings.
Whether they should be removed from the bench is for the impeachment process to determine – but impeachment is clearly warranted.
Wrong. The Supreme Court of 1973 somehow found that abortion was a Constitutional right and made it legal nationwide. The Supreme Court of a few years ago somehow found that same-sex marriage was also Constitutional, even though marriage laws have always been a state responsibility and same-sex marriage was illegal in most states.That's not true .. the judicial system doesn't make law .. the legislative branch does. The Supreme Court determines what is and what is not constitutional based on current legislation.
Of course it was legal. The Supreme Court can say anything is legal if they want to. Who's gonna stop them?Sure they all did.
They were all asked if they thought Roe vs Wade was legal, and they all said in the affirmative.
They then could not now rule against it without having had lied then.
They didn't, these glittering idiots don't have any understanding of the rule of law, they exist on emotional arguments.Where did they lie under oath?
They think that because a court decides something, even if it is a bad decision, somehow that same bad precedent must be followed however, stare decisis includes not following precedent in the case of an unworkable decision. Lefties are knuckle dragging troglodytes.Wrong. The Supreme Court of 1973 somehow found that abortion was a Constitutional right and made it legal nationwide. The Supreme Court of a few years ago somehow found that same-sex marriage was also Constitutional, even though marriage laws have always been a state responsibility and same-sex marriage was illegal in most states.
First they didn’t lie. They used the same evasive answers that liberal justices have used in the recent past.The fact these SCOTUS appointees committed perjury is not relevant compared to their real crime.
Which the obvious violation of the 14th amendment, in order to give states the illegal authority to dictate religious views on abortion.
States have no standing when it comes to the personal opinion as to what a fetus is or who has to deal with it.
States can not then legally make any laws on abortion at all.
The 6 who ruled against Roe Vs Wade then violated basic aspect of a republic, and committed treason.
They over threw our government in a conspiracy of those who want to replace it with a Christian theocracy, when even the Christian Bible is not against abortion.
No they didn’t say it was legal. They said it was “settled law”. It was, but so was Dred Scot and Plessy vs Ferguson until they were overturned. No law is above being overturned, even the Constitution can be amended.Sure they all did.
They were all asked if they thought Roe vs Wade was legal, and they all said in the affirmative.
They then could not now rule against it without having had lied then.