AOC wants to impeach USSC judges

[Roudy]

You had me at "AOC".

 

[Indeependent]

Nice rant, do you feel better? Care to address the topic?

No.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I want to see them try to do it.
They aren't finished making total asses of themselves yet.

The real issue here is that neither AOC, Collins, nor Manchin are lawyers. They are just plain too dumb to understand what precedent means.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Kav and Gor seemed to have crossed the line into perjury. The others fell short of that.

Thomas, of course, should be impeached for rank corruption. His wife takes millions in lobbyist money, and donors know they're buying the vote of her husband. They're a couple, so he shares in that money. He's literally the most corrupt justice in US history.

Needless to say, that sort of corruption thrills every conservative here. They want every justice to be on the take like Thomas.

You don't know what precedent means either, or you would not be stupid enough to make such ridiculous claims, just like AOC, Collins, and Manchin. They did not lie just because you don't understand.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

more like a train load of anvils

Oh, I like that one!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Have you seen her teeth, it's why she can't shut her mouth

I call her "Donkey Chompers".

 

[BackAgain]

Humor alert:

This thread discusses the stuff spewed out of the horse’s mouth where that mouth is part of AOC’s brainless head.

She’s one of the dumbest creatures ever to walk the halls of Congress yet her imbecile complaints are being discussed as though anything she says has any actual meaning.

 

[jc456]

Do any of these bitches have a tit shot? That would actually be contributory.
These loons want impeachment as the tool for whenever lawful rulings and facts don’t match their feelings.

Well wait, what’s the

 

[BackAgain]

As a congressperson, AOC wasn’t even a great rooftop dancer.

 

[Nostra]

Kav and Gor seemed to have crossed the line into perjury. The others fell short of that.

Thomas, of course, should be impeached for rank corruption. His wife takes millions in lobbyist money, and donors know they're buying the vote of her husband. They're a couple, so he shares in that money. He's literally the most corrupt justice in US history.

Needless to say, that sort of corruption thrills every conservative here. They want every justice to be on the take like Thomas.

Really? Show us where they said how they would rule on a case that came before them?

They used the Ginsberg Rule, Dipshit.

 

[Nostra]

AOC is usually to much of a crackpot for me but she does bring up a good point. SCOTUS judges are not above the law and above consequence. If they lied or misled or commit crimes etc then they can be impeached, correct? The question is, Where do we draw the line?

Where did they lie under oath?

 

[Slade3200]

No.

Didn’t think so

 

[Leo123]

And appropriately so – they lied while under oath during their confirmation hearings.

Whether they should be removed from the bench is for the impeachment process to determine – but impeachment is clearly warranted.

None of the justices said Roe could not be overturned. You are lying....again. Stare Decisis is not an inexorable command. When a prior decision is unworkable or badly reasoned, Stare Decisis may not be applied and the court may not follow precedent.

 

[BS Filter]

That's not true .. the judicial system doesn't make law .. the legislative branch does. The Supreme Court determines what is and what is not constitutional based on current legislation.

Wrong. The Supreme Court of 1973 somehow found that abortion was a Constitutional right and made it legal nationwide. The Supreme Court of a few years ago somehow found that same-sex marriage was also Constitutional, even though marriage laws have always been a state responsibility and same-sex marriage was illegal in most states.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Bring it on.

 

[BS Filter]

Sure they all did.
They were all asked if they thought Roe vs Wade was legal, and they all said in the affirmative.
They then could not now rule against it without having had lied then.

Of course it was legal. The Supreme Court can say anything is legal if they want to. Who's gonna stop them?

 

[Leo123]

Where did they lie under oath?

They didn't, these glittering idiots don't have any understanding of the rule of law, they exist on emotional arguments.

 

[Leo123]

Wrong. The Supreme Court of 1973 somehow found that abortion was a Constitutional right and made it legal nationwide. The Supreme Court of a few years ago somehow found that same-sex marriage was also Constitutional, even though marriage laws have always been a state responsibility and same-sex marriage was illegal in most states.

They think that because a court decides something, even if it is a bad decision, somehow that same bad precedent must be followed however, stare decisis includes not following precedent in the case of an unworkable decision. Lefties are knuckle dragging troglodytes.

 

[AZrailwhale]

The fact these SCOTUS appointees committed perjury is not relevant compared to their real crime.
Which the obvious violation of the 14th amendment, in order to give states the illegal authority to dictate religious views on abortion.
States have no standing when it comes to the personal opinion as to what a fetus is or who has to deal with it.
States can not then legally make any laws on abortion at all.

The 6 who ruled against Roe Vs Wade then violated basic aspect of a republic, and committed treason.
They over threw our government in a conspiracy of those who want to replace it with a Christian theocracy, when even the Christian Bible is not against abortion.

First they didn’t lie. They used the same evasive answers that liberal justices have used in the recent past.
Second, all they did was to correct a bad decision made by the Burger Court in 1973 that invented a “right” out of thin air. Roe was always going to be overturned for the simple reason it was a bad decision not based in law. Abortion still exists, all SCOTUS did was to return it to the legislatures where Burger should have left in in 1973. Liberals didn’t have the votes in 1973, it’s likely that they do today. Most people are used to the idea after it being acceptable for the last forty nine years.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Sure they all did.
They were all asked if they thought Roe vs Wade was legal, and they all said in the affirmative.
They then could not now rule against it without having had lied then.

No they didn’t say it was legal. They said it was “settled law”. It was, but so was Dred Scot and Plessy vs Ferguson until they were overturned. No law is above being overturned, even the Constitution can be amended.