AOC Slips Up, Admits Trump’s NYC Trial Is To Keep Him From Leaving The City To Campaign

That MSN article was written before Cohen's testimony. Cohen provided all the missing pieces for the jury since that article was written.

As for the Washington Times, that's a MAGA rag bent on misleading you rubes.

The prosecution has proven every allegation in the indictment.

The incompetent prosecution has proven that their witnesses were a laughable joke. Cohen, a convicted perjuror, even managed to admit a crime he committed by stealing funds from the Trump Organization.

The prosecution has proven only that they’re a collection of bumbling hacks.
 
Cohen, a convicted perjuror, even managed to admit a crime he committed by stealing funds from the Trump Organization.
That's what you get, when criminals testify against their criminal coconspirators. You get a criminal witness. Gotti was convicted on the testimony of admitted murderers and thieves.

You seem to think that's some sort of automatic out. Well, if so, you're wrong.
 
The incompetent prosecution has proven that their witnesses were a laughable joke. Cohen, a convicted perjuror, even managed to admit a crime he committed by stealing funds from the Trump Organization.

The prosecution has proven only that they’re a collection of bumbling hacks.
What they have proven most effectively is what a lying criminal Cohen is.
 
What they have proven most effectively is what a lying criminal Cohen is.
Then the jury looks at the defense table and sees the piece of shit that retained Cohen as his right hand man for a decade.

So I'm not sure you are making the awesome point you think you are making.
 
It obviously escaped you that the phony Bragg and Fani Willis witch hunts were timed to occur before the election.
You dumb dupes have been parroting Trump's bullshit for years.

First, it was, "You can't indict a sitting president!" and "Let the voters decide in 2020!"

The voters decided to kick Trump's pasty tiny balls over the moon. So Trump decided to compound his criminal liabilities by attempting a coup.

Finally, when all excuses were gone and Trump was finally indicted well over a year ago, Trump deliberately engaged delay tactics so his trials would be pushed either to just before the election at which you could parrot his scream of "Elecshun interfeernce!", or use delay tactics which would push his trials beyond the election, which you could then rinse and repeat, "You can't try a sitting president!" or which Trump could abuse his office and fire everyone holding him accountable and snuff the trials.


Oh. And let me remind you what ACTUAL interference looks like, asshole.

trump-january-6.jpg


jan-6-10.jpg


jan-6-4.jpg


jan-6-5.jpg



 
Democracked assault on demoracy, "in the name of democracy".

Leftists often sing antonyms, and confessions. In this case, a light should have gone on the moment they said Trump was a threat to democracy.
 
That's what you get, when criminals testify against their criminal coconspirators. You get a criminal witness. Gotti was convicted on the testimony of admitted murderers and thieves.

You seem to think that's some sort of automatic out. Well, if so, you're wrong.

Pointless.
 
You dumb dupes have been parroting Trump's bullshit for years.

First, it was, "You can't indict a sitting president!" and "Let the voters decide in 2020!"

The voters decided to kick Trump's pasty tiny balls over the moon. So Trump decided to compound his criminal liabilities by attempting a coup.

Finally, when all excuses were gone and Trump was finally indicted well over a year ago, Trump deliberately engaged delay tactics so his trials would be pushed either to just before the election at which you could parrot his scream of "Elecshun interfeernce!", or use delay tactics which would push his trials beyond the election, which you could then rinse and repeat, "You can't try a sitting president!" or which Trump could abuse his office and fire everyone holding him accountable and snuff the trials.


Oh. And let me remind you what ACTUAL interference looks like, asshole.

trump-january-6.jpg


jan-6-10.jpg


jan-6-4.jpg


jan-6-5.jpg


A lot of cutting and pasting to waste bandwidth.
 
That MSN article was written before Cohen's testimony. Cohen provided all the missing pieces for the jury since that article was written.

As for the Washington Times, that's a MAGA rag bent on misleading you rubes.

The prosecution has proven every allegation in the indictment.
Cohen doesn’t write the indictment. That’s the point. The indictment doesn’t specify a crime. So, what allegations has the prosecution proven?
 
The indictment doesn’t specify a crime
The criminal code was specified in a later filing. Did you not know that?

And we have been over this. The prosecution does not have to charge every criminal act they argue the truth of.
 
Last edited:
Cohen doesn’t write the indictment. That’s the point. The indictment doesn’t specify a crime. So, what allegations has the prosecution proven?
It’s some sort of bullshit like they have a misdemeanor but because of the undisclosed insidious nature of the undisclosed “underlying charge” then it becomes an unidentified felony
 
It’s some sort of bullshit like they have a misdemeanor but because of the undisclosed insidious nature of the undisclosed “underlying charge” then it becomes an unidentified felony
That's right! A law that was on the books long before the 38 second Mushroom hunt.
 
The indictment doesn’t specify a crime.
Why do you people keep repeating this lie? Who is telling you this? Is it Tucker? Jesse Waters? Who?

When you parrot hoaxes like this, you are proving you haven't so much as glanced at the indictment.

Good god, man. Have some self-respect. Don't obliterate your integrity so cheaply.
 
The indictment doesn’t specify a crime.
Bend over. Time for a spanking.

THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accusesthe defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRSTDEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:


SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:


THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:


FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:



Do you need me to include all 34 violations? Or are you properly chastened yet?
 

Forum List

Back
Top