AOC, OMG, on Byron Donald's duplicitous presentation.

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
15,257
12,694
2,320


“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

Rep. Byron Donald (R) pulled a Faux. He purposely presented "evidence" during the hearing designed, literally, to mislead those who viewed it. A US congressman used a doctored visual aide during about the most important thing Congress could consider, impeachment. It was a new low for Repubs when new lows are hard to come by given their repeated duplicity.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump it would have been highlighted 24/7 for days on end by right wing media. Days.
 
Last edited:
The black guy in Congress owns tards like you.
He still owns Bori girl with the hot booty.
 
Am I wrong for thinking AOC isn't evil and means well but is just naive and has potential?

No I don't just wanna date her, she's pretty, but I couldn't stand that voice. :nono:

And she's not blonde. She's smart. She's not stupid.

I ain't letting some pretty girl lead me to communism. :nono:
 
The black guy in Congress owns tards like you.
He still owns Bori girl with the hot booty.
Spoken out of an abundance of ignorance, as always. Did you hear what she had to say about Donald's presentation? It was a fraud.
 


“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

Rep. Byron Donald (R) pulled a Faux. He purposely presented "evidence" during the hearing designed, literally, to mislead those who viewed it. A US congressman used a doctored visual aide during about the most important thing Congress could consider, impeachment. It was a new low for Repubs when new lows are hard to come by given their repeated duplicity.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump it would have been highlighted 24/7 for days on end by right wing media. Days.

Are you stupid or something?
The Democrats not only did this in Trump's trial... they did it twice.
 


“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

Rep. Byron Donald (R) pulled a Faux. He purposely presented "evidence" during the hearing designed, literally, to mislead those who viewed it. A US congressman used a doctored visual aide during about the most important thing Congress could consider, impeachment. It was a new low for Repubs when new lows are hard to come by given their repeated duplicity.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump it would have been highlighted 24/7 for days on end by right wing media. Days.

Wait a minute…was text changed?
 
Wait a minute…was text changed?
AOC presented evidence that was accepted by the Chairman showing Donald's material was intentionally presented without the context that completely changed its meaning. It was purposefully deceptive after Donald characterized it as "evidence."
He began the presentation saying, "now we're going to get to some evidence."
 
What's the falsehood?

What words were different from what was actually said?

So far, all you shown was the AOC claimed something, not that Byron Donald's lied about anything.
 
Are you stupid or something?
The Democrats not only did this in Trump's trial... they did it twice.
What evidence did the Dems present during Trump's impeachments that was altered to give a false impression?
 
What's the falsehood?

What words were different from what was actually said?

So far, all you shown was the AOC claimed something, not that Byron Donald's lied about anything.
See post #7. Or watch the video.
 
“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

“I don’t know where it came from. I don’t know if it was the staff of the committee, but it was not the direct screenshot from that phone,” she added.

The New York congresswoman said the fabricated image excluded “critical context that changed the underlying meaning and allegation.”

 
What evidence did the Dems present during Trump's impeachments that was altered to give a false impression?
Two..
1) In a graphic showing a Tweet, they added a blue check mark in an attempt to verify that the tweet was real. It was not. The House impeachment Democrats said "it was a mistake"... yeah.. somehow it was just added by mistake! And then later in the testimony on a tweet "We are bringing the Calvery" - they did it again! And then again said "it was a mistake".
2) They altered speech text given by Trump, and removed the words where he talked about peaceful protests, and switched words to make it appear they were said together.
 
AOC presented evidence that was accepted by the Chairman showing Donald's material was intentionally presented without the context that completely changed its meaning. It was purposefully deceptive after Donald characterized it as "evidence."
He began the presentation saying, "now we're going to get to some evidence."
So, that’s a no.

Text wasn’t changed…
 
So, that’s a no.

Text wasn’t changed…
You understand the text not being changed is immaterial to Donald's presentation creating a false impression by not including the entire text which adds context, right? Or is this stuff too complicated for you?
 
You cannot tell us in your own words, but you are hoping we'll be all a twitter over whatever it is?


Damned if I'll watch a minute of Big Booty where she's talking instead of walking that I don't have to.
All the information you need is included on the video of AOC speaking. You only need to click on the link. Please don't..........

1695986488372.png
 
AOC has earned the right to be ridiculed from all her past ignoramic statements. She's not too bright and not honorable in the least. Her constituency must be a bunch of uneducated masochists.
 


“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

Rep. Byron Donald (R) pulled a Faux. He purposely presented "evidence" during the hearing designed, literally, to mislead those who viewed it. A US congressman used a doctored visual aide during about the most important thing Congress could consider, impeachment. It was a new low for Repubs when new lows are hard to come by given their repeated duplicity.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump it would have been highlighted 24/7 for days on end by right wing media. Days.

It's pretty damn funny hearing libtards bitching about this, after what Adam Schiff did, after what all the scumbags on the J6 "committee" did.

No sympathy. I hope they railroad you leftard fuckups with your own methods.

And fuck you for bitching about it in the first place. Your whining is music to rightie ears. Please, whine some more so we can laugh at you assholes some more
 

Forum List

Back
Top