AOC is a socialist. Is that bad?

[Billy000]

Can anyone say why its bad??

Uh, well, let's see: Cuba, Venezuela, Spain, Italy, Greece, England, etc.

.....Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Japan, THE UNITED STATES, and oh yeah, basically any other county because EVERY country is socialist in nature.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Socialism creates poverty and California has the most poverty of all the states. AOC wants all of the US to be a socialist shithole.

There will be no poverty in AOC's libcommie America because the govt will raise taxes for enough welfare to eliminate poverty. Soon enough more and more people will elect poverty over work and America will be Cuba or Venezuela with more poverty than ever.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

[


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

You mean like this filthy *****'s "need" for an Obamaphone?




How about these idiots in Venezuela that voted for Socialism and now has the "need" for food and water?

only if you major in minors.

Our federal doctrine expresses promotion and provision for the general welfare, not the general malfare, or the general warfare.

**** welfare Moon Bat.

The General Clause has been explained to you many times and it has nothing to do with the filthy welfare state but since you are an uneducated low information Moon Bat you are unable to comprehend.

danny is a typical violent liberal. Reason means nothing to him.

 

[danielpalos]

i may agree with you with a social compact; our social contract is in writing and termed and styled, a Constitution.

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

It is a document defining government structure and law.

It is not a voluntary agreement between two parties which is what a contract is strictly limited to

It had to be ratified; it is a legal binding social contract for our Body Politic.

 

[danielpalos]

[


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

You mean like this filthy *****'s "need" for an Obamaphone?




How about these idiots in Venezuela that voted for Socialism and now has the "need" for food and water?

only if you major in minors.

Our federal doctrine expresses promotion and provision for the general welfare, not the general malfare, or the general warfare.

**** welfare Moon Bat.

The General Clause has been explained to you many times and it has nothing to do with the filthy welfare state but since you are an uneducated low information Moon Bat you are unable to comprehend.

it has nothing to do with a warfare-State. A welfare-State is expressly enumerated. simple right wing bigotry is your problem.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Constitution is not a social contract

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

It is a document defining government structure and law.

It is not a voluntary agreement between two parties which is what a contract is strictly limited to

It had to be ratified; it is a legal binding social contract for our Body Politic.

No it is not a contract at all

Contracts are not ratified

Failed argument from you again

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. You need a valid, superior argument to win.

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

It is a document defining government structure and law.

It is not a voluntary agreement between two parties which is what a contract is strictly limited to

It had to be ratified; it is a legal binding social contract for our Body Politic.

No it is not a contract at all

Contracts are not ratified

Failed argument from you again

it is a legally binding social contract. we all agree it is express not implied.

 

[McRocket]

It's not bad...it's just not the way I think things should be run.

I actually like her style...just not her love of HUGE government.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is not a social contract and my argument is superior to yours.

It is not a contract at all in any way shape or form

What is it, then?

It is a document defining government structure and law.

It is not a voluntary agreement between two parties which is what a contract is strictly limited to

It had to be ratified; it is a legal binding social contract for our Body Politic.

No it is not a contract at all

Contracts are not ratified

Failed argument from you again

it is a legally binding social contract. we all agree it is express not implied.

It is not a contract of any sort

No one agrees with you

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Can anyone say why its bad??

She has help us to Id the other Commies in the Group.

 

[Billy000]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

 

[SAYIT]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

That may be your definition of socialism but not the dictionary's:

so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/

Learn to pronounce
noun

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
   • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

 

[Billy000]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

That may be your definition of socialism but not the dictionary's:

so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/

Learn to pronounce
noun

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
   • (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

Lol what the hell do you think “owned regulated by the community as a whole” means? God you people are dense.

 

[Soupnazi630]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

 

[Billy000]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

Stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

 

[Wyatt earp]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

Stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

You sure don't, socialism is the government owning most bussines, you are just trying to change it so it doesn't sound like a bunch of lazy people like you.

 

[Billy000]

EVERY country is socialist in nature.

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

Stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

You sure don't, socialism is the government owning most bussines, you are just trying to change it so it doesn't sound like a bunch of lazy people like you.

lol one of you says some bullshit they make up on the spot and the rest of you parrot it to make it sound more true when in reality none of you know what the **** you are talking about. I mean, granted, this would be an example of socialism, but all it is an example. Pretending it’s the entire definition is complete non sense.

 

[Wyatt earp]

dear, socialism is when govt owns major industries. Only a liberal would be so slow as not to know that.

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

Stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

You sure don't, socialism is the government owning most bussines, you are just trying to change it so it doesn't sound like a bunch of lazy people like you.

lol one of you says some bullshit they make up on the spot and the rest of you parrot it to make it sound more true when in reality none of you know what the **** you are talking about. I mean, granted, this would be an example of socialism, but all it is an example. Pretending it’s the entire definition is complete non sense.

It is the real definition , you guys are changing it so it doesn't sound so scary. Heck Great Brit was socialist after WWII and you guys got mad when Margret abandoned it in the 1980s.

.

 

[Billy000]

No actually. Anything funded but not necessarily utilized by citizens is socialism. Therefore, any program funded by tax revenue is socialist.

Wrong

Socialism is not any government program

It is government owns major industries and businesses

Stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

You sure don't, socialism is the government owning most bussines, you are just trying to change it so it doesn't sound like a bunch of lazy people like you.

lol one of you says some bullshit they make up on the spot and the rest of you parrot it to make it sound more true when in reality none of you know what the **** you are talking about. I mean, granted, this would be an example of socialism, but all it is an example. Pretending it’s the entire definition is complete non sense.

It is the real definition , you guys are changing it so it doesn't sound so scary. Heck Great Brit was socialist after WWII and you guys got mad when Margret abandoned it in the 1980s.

.

It’s just amazing how you just make shit up as you go along and expect me to just buy it.