Anything refuting Joe Kent's claim that all 18 intel agencies had no evidence Iran was trying to build a nuke bomb?

[BackAgain]

Delusional.

Where are the intelligence reports of Iran weaponizing its stockpile of nuclear materials (that Trump failed to secure) to threaten the United States?

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it was not the intelligence community’s job to establish whether Iran had posed an “imminent threat” to America before the war.​

​

“It is not the intelligence community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat.”​

​

US intelligence agencies 'not responsible for saying if Iran was an imminent threat' | The National

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says only the President can decide what constitutes immediate risk

www.thenationalnews.com

​

Yes. You are entitled to classified material because … why?

 

[schmidlap]

Yes. You are entitled to classified material because … why?

Do you actually believe that Trump's Director of National Intelligence is ignorant regarding what is an imminent threat to the U.S.?

 

[Seymour Flops]

The question is did our 18 intel agencies have any evidence Iran was trying to build a nuke bomb.

The answer is clearly NO.

Thanks....

Is Joe Kent basing that on classified information he accessed while working for the government with a clearance, or is he just guessing and inferring like any other Joe Schmoe could?

 

[EMH]

Is Joe Kent basing that on classified information he accessed while working for the government with a clearance, or is he just guessing and inferring like any other Joe Schmoe could?

LOL!!!

The answer is NO, our 18 "intel agencies" (which need to be DOGE-ed) did not have ANY real info that Iran was trying to build a nuke.

The entire "stop Iran from getting a nuke" line is 100% pure treasonous Zionist Fascist BULLSHIT.

Joe Kent is the patriotic American who told us that truth.

You hate him for doing that.

 

[Seymour Flops]

LOL!!!

The answer is NO, our 18 "intel agencies" (which need to be DOGE-ed) did not have ANY real info that Iran was trying to build a nuke.

The entire "stop Iran from getting a nuke" line is 100% pure treasonous Zionist Fascist BULLSHIT.

Joe Kent is the patriotic American who told us that truth.

You hate him for doing that.

Is that special knowledge that Joe Kent has from being a government employee with a clearance? Or is that just Joe Kent private citizen giving his opinion?

If it is based on classified knowledge that he is passing on then of course Joe Kent should go to prison and probably for the rest of his life. If that is what happened to Chelsea Manning, a low-ranking soldier, then, why should Joe Kent, a high ranking intelligence official get special treatment?

If it is just Joe Kent's opinion, then my answer is "okay and . . . ?"

Which is it?

 

[EMH]

Is that special knowledge that Joe Kent has from being a government employee with a clearance? Or is that just Joe Kent private citizen giving his opinion?

If it is based on classified knowledge that he is passing on then of course Joe Kent should go to prison and probably for the rest of his life. If that is what happened to Chelsea Manning, a low-ranking soldier, then, why should Joe Kent, a high ranking intelligence official get special treatment?

If it is just Joe Kent's opinion, then my answer is "okay and . . . ?"

Which is it?

Zionist Fascism's take - if he outed our treasonous plan to sell out US troops to serve Isreal, "get him!!!"


1. America is not entitled to truth about Zionist Fascism.
2. Zionist Fascism has the right to hate hoax and lie America into wars to serve Israel
3. The American people don't have the right to know or notice that truth


That's your opinion of America today, fascist traitor.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Zionist Fascism's take - if he outed our treasonous plan to sell out US troops to serve Isreal, "get him!!!"


1. America is not entitled to truth about Zionist Fascism.
2. Zionist Fascism has the right to hate hoax and lie America into wars to serve Israel
3. The American people don't have the right to know or notice that truth


That's your opinion of America today, fascist traitor.

Ih no, Im hoping and assuming best case scenario that he is just spouting his personal opinion like the rest of us.

If you are claiming he has insider knowledge, please post your evidence that he is aharing it.

Of course if you can prove that I would have to assume that he also had insider knowledge about covid and the vaccines.

 

[Meathead]

Trump keeps claiming that those who did not want a US war with Iran are for Iran getting a nuke bomb.

Joe Kent refuted that.

We are still waiting for anyone to refute what Joe Kent claimed, that all 18 US intel agencies had nothing.

So far, nothing but

nut job
anti semite
the Jooooos
you're a muslim


from the IQ<5 Greg Gutfeld audience

Weird. You'd think they wouldn't insist on building one if they didn't want to.

 

[EMH]

If you are claiming he has insider knowledge

He worked under Tulsi, he saw everything the 18 intel agencies had on the subject, and none of it had any suggestion that Iran was developing a nuke bomb.

 

[EMH]

Weird. You'd think they wouldn't insist on building one if they didn't want to.

Except other than having a treasonous beak and an IQ under 5 birdbrain and being unable to stop parroting Fox News, there isn't any evidence they were.


Just endlessly repeating they were trying to without any evidence is all your side has....

 

[Seymour Flops]

He worked under Tulsi, he saw everything the 18 intel agencies had on the subject, and none of it had any suggestion that Iran was developing a nuke bomb.

Oh then he is passing on classified information?

Sounds like Todd Blanch's first major case!

Did Tulsi also tell him why iran insists on keeping their nuclear weapons program when they don't even have one?

 

[BackAgain]

Do you actually believe that Trump's Director of National Intelligence is ignorant regarding what is an imminent threat to the U.S.?

Do I believe that your OP is credible given that “source?”

No.

 

[schmidlap]

Do I believe that your OP is credible given that “source?”

No.

You will believe whatever you need to believe, even if Trump's own Director of National Intelligence refuses to say that Iran was an imminent threat to the U.S. when he and Bibi started bombing it.

 

[BackAgain]

You will believe whatever you need to believe, even if Trump's own Director of National Intelligence refuses to say that Iran was an imminent threat to the U.S. when he and Bibi started bombing it.

You, of course, always disbelieve anything and everything spoken by our President.

How “imminent” the threat was has been discussed time and time again.

You just don’t give a shit about facts.

And what she said is that the determination of how imminent the threat may be is me for the President to make.

 

[EMH]

Oh then he is passing on classified information?

Sounds like Todd Blanch's first major case!

Did Tulsi also tell him why iran insists on keeping their nuclear weapons program when they don't even have one?

So let's get your position straight.

It is OK to LIE and claim there was intel saying Iran had a nuke bomb program even if no such intel ever existed. But it would be a horrible crime to let the American people know the truth...

how the mind of the Zionist Fascist really thinks...

 

[Seymour Flops]

So let's get your position straight.

It is OK to LIE and claim there was intel saying Iran had a nuke bomb program even if no such intel ever existed. But it would be a horrible crime to let the American people know the truth...

how the mind of the Zionist Fascist really thinks...

No, my position is that Kent is full of ship.

 

[EMH]

No, my position is that Kent is full of ship.

But so far there has been no claim there is "intel" that Iran was developing nukes, or it would have been presented to us.

There is just a "chant" that "Iran can't have a nuke" and that chant has been going on in America for 40 years during which

there has not even been a radiation spike, much less a nuke test, in Iran.

 

[Seymour Flops]

But so far there has been no claim there is "intel" that Iran was developing nukes, or it would have been presented to us.

There is just a "chant" that "Iran can't have a nuke" and that chant has been going on in America for 40 years during which

there has not even been a radiation spike, much less a nuke test, in Iran.

The Iranians themselves are claiming it.

 

[EMH]

The Iranians themselves are claiming it.

Mossad fraud, just like the "Islamic Jihad" Mossad who claimed to do the Marines in Lebanon 1983 two weeks AFTER Cap Weinberger ruled out Hezbo as a suspect....

 

[shockedcanadian]

He could be speaking the truth, I am not going to just dismiss him offhand. However, here is what I would say to that, another Chinese proxy called N Korea was also supposed to be many years away from having a nuke, we saw how that worked out. We also know the awful attack on 9/11, or a decade earlier the bomb in the garage of the WTC. Ultimately, foreign enemies understand the intel game also, it is cat and mouse, we don't know what we don't know. Iran with zero nuclear fussion is far more appealing.