Anything refuting Joe Kent's claim that all 18 intel agencies had no evidence Iran was trying to build a nuke bomb?

[EMH]

Trump keeps claiming that those who did not want a US war with Iran are for Iran getting a nuke bomb.

Joe Kent refuted that.

We are still waiting for anyone to refute what Joe Kent claimed, that all 18 US intel agencies had nothing.

So far, nothing but

nut job
anti semite
the Jooooos
you're a muslim


from the IQ<5 Greg Gutfeld audience

 

[JLW]

Iran was no threat to us. The Trump neoconservative used the same lies that W. used in the run up to the war in Iraq. The same fools fell for it again. Once an idiot, always an idiot.

 

[luiza]

Of course not

But you cannot have a decent War with the Joe Kent’s of this Psy Op World wandering around telling the truth .

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is a dupe of your own thread, yes?

Is Joe Kent a credible person?

He is what you would call "an election denier," also an anti-vaxxer, who says that Mister Fauci should be charged with murder.

Let me guess: Joe Kent is only credible only when he says stuff that you agree with or want to hear?

 

[DGS49]

Well, you just had two of the top Iranian muthafukkas telling our negotiating team that they absolutely would not abandon their program to develop a nuclear bomb.

There's that. Does that count as "evidence"?

You fukking idiot.

 

[Hafar1014]

Iran was no threat to us. The Trump neoconservative used the same lies that W. used in the run up to the war in Iraq. The same fools fell for it again. Once an idiot, always an idiot.

 

[leftwinger]

Trump keeps claiming that those who did not want a US war with Iran are for Iran getting a nuke bomb.

Joe Kent refuted that.

We are still waiting for anyone to refute what Joe Kent claimed, that all 18 US intel agencies had nothing.

So far, nothing but

nut job
anti semite
the Jooooos
you're a muslim


from the IQ<5 Greg Gutfeld audience

Why do we pay for 18 of them doing the same thing?

 

[Hafar1014]

Iran is not a threat now. What kind of stupid thinks violent religious fanatics should have nuclear weapon.

 

[JGalt]

Iran was no threat to us. The Trump neoconservative used the same lies that W. used in the run up to the war in Iraq. The same fools fell for it again. Once an idiot, always an idiot.

If some of the stipulations of the ceasefire negotiation was that Iran should Iran must halt uranium enrichment, surrender existing stockpiles, and allow monitoring of their nuclear infrastructure, why did they refuse?

 

[leftwinger]

1983 Beirut barracks bombing, which killed 241 U.S. Marines and service members, and the 1979-1981 U.S. Embassy hostage crisis in Tehran where 66 Americans were held for 444 days. Other major incidents involve the 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing in Beirut that killed 17 Americans, the 1985 TWA Flight 847 hijacking resulting in the execution of a U.S. Navy diver, and the 1989 kidnapping and killing of U.S. Marine Colonel William Higgins by Hezbollah.

 

[leftwinger]

In the 1990s and 2000s, attacks included the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. Airmen, the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania facilitated by Hezbollah that killed 12 Americans, and a 1984 hijacking of Kuwait Airways Flight 221 where two American officials were killed in Tehran. The 2003-2011 period saw Iranian-backed militias kill at least 603 U.S. troops in Iraq, representing roughly one in every six American combat fatalities during that conflict, alongside the 2007 assassination of five U.S. soldiers in Karbala by IRGC Quds Force operatives.

 

[leftwinger]

January 2020 ballistic missile attack on Ain al-Asad airbase in Iraq that caused over 100 U.S. troops to suffer traumatic brain injuries, the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel which killed at least 48 Americans, and the 2024 drone strike in Jordan by Kataib Hezbollah that killed three U.S. soldiers. The search results also note the 2007 disappearance of FBI agent Robert Levinson in Iran, later confirmed by his family to be a likely death in prison, and the 2019 rocket attack in Kirkuk that killed an American civilian contractor

 

[schmidlap]

Trump keeps claiming that those who did not want a US war with Iran are for Iran getting a nuke bomb.

Joe Kent refuted that.

We are still waiting for anyone to refute what Joe Kent claimed, that all 18 US intel agencies had nothing.

So far, nothing but

nut job
anti semite
the Jooooos
you're a muslim


from the IQ<5 Greg Gutfeld audience

Under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) Iran agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons and allow continuous monitoring of its compliance in exchange for relief from economic sanctions.​

Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018.​

Did Trump's Iran nuclear deal exit affect today's conflict?

President Trump withdrew from the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal in 2018. He broke his 2016 promise to renegotiate the deal. The deal had allowed foreign monitoring in exchange for relief from sanctions, but Trump said it didn’t go far enough.

www.politifact.com

​

As a consequence,​

‘Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards!’​

Trump announces Strait of Hormuz blockade​

The cult's defense of their erratic messiah?

"Oh, yeah!
Well, that there Biden..."

Gas prices in the U.S. have recently surpassed $4 per gallon, the highest since 2022, largely influenced by the ongoing Iran war, which has disrupted global oil markets and increased wholesale fuel costs. These fluctuations can occur daily, causing noticeable differences between nearby stations and leaving drivers feeling frustrated.

‘When oil prices go up, we make a lot of money!’
​

​

 

[JLW]

If some of the stipulations of the ceasefire negotiation was that Iran should Iran must halt uranium enrichment, surrender existing stockpiles, and allow monitoring of their nuclear infrastructure, why did they refuse?

Sounds like Trump wants an agreement like the JCPOA that he pulled out of.

If Trump had stayed within the framework we would not be here right now. At any rate, if Trump thought Iran was violating the JCPOA, why we he trust them again under a new agreement?

Core Principles of the 2015 Deal

• Purpose: To ensure Iran’s nuclear program remains exclusively peaceful in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
• Restrictions: Iran agreed to limit its uranium enrichment to 3.67%, cap its enriched uranium stockpile at 300kg, and reduce the number of operating centrifuges, among other measures.
• Monitoring: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was granted enhanced monitoring access to Iranian facilities.
  

 

[TNHarley]

Well, you just had two of the top Iranian muthafukkas telling our negotiating team that they absolutely would not abandon their program to develop a nuclear bomb.

There's that. Does that count as "evidence"?

You fukking idiot.

Do you have a link to Iran saying that?

 

[JGalt]

Sounds like Trump wants an agreement like the JCPOA that he pulled out of.

If Trump had stayed within the framework we would not be here right now. At any rate, if Trump thought Iran was violating the JCPOA, why we he trust them again under a new agreement?

Core Principles of the 2015 Deal

• Purpose: To ensure Iran’s nuclear program remains exclusively peaceful in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
• Restrictions: Iran agreed to limit its uranium enrichment to 3.67%, cap its enriched uranium stockpile at 300kg, and reduce the number of operating centrifuges, among other measures.
• Monitoring: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was granted enhanced monitoring access to Iranian facilities.

The JCPOA was a horrible one-sided deal that gave Iran too many economic benefits in exchange for temporary restrictions on its nuclear program. With the benefits and money Iran made from the JCPOA and the sanctions it removed, Iran received a windfall of cash and access to the international financial system. That allowed them to further develop their ballistic missile program and fund terrorist proxies and regional militants such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

Besides, The JCPOA's restrictions on key nuclear activities were only temporary (10-15 years), which did nothing but delay, rather than preventing Iran's ability to pursue nuclear weapons.

 

[EMH]

This is a dupe of your own thread, yes?

Is Joe Kent a credible person?

He is what you would call "an election denier," also an anti-vaxxer, who says that Mister Fauci should be charged with murder.

Let me guess: Joe Kent is only credible only when he says stuff that you agree with or want to hear?

The question is did our 18 intel agencies have any evidence Iran was trying to build a nuke bomb.

The answer is clearly NO.

Thanks....

 

[EMH]

1983 Beirut barracks bombing,

This is a treasonous lie. The original claim was that Hezbo did it. Cap Weinberger cleared Hezbo. Then, two weeks later, 2 Mossad in Muslim drag claimed on Israeli TV that they were "Islamic Jihad" and they did it.

We never heard of Islamic Jihad again until the third season of Fox' "24" show.


MOSSAD DID THAT and HATE HOAXED IT ON HEZBO.

1979-1981 U.S. Embassy hostage crisis in Tehran

100% the result of anti conservative interventionalist PRO ISRAEL "foreign policy" to support the Zionist Shah's takeover of the Iran democracy at the time. 100% Zionist Fascism's fault. Had we a PRO AMERICA foreign policy we would never have been in bed with Zionist Fascist JDAAM Shah

The 2003-2011 period saw Iranian-backed militias kill at least 603 U.S. troops in Iraq

EVERY SINGLE CASUALTY from Iraq is 100% the fault of

the treasonous W Administration
anyone who cannot figure out 911 was a false flag Zionist Fascist Hate Hoax (IQ over 5 required)
the cause of Zionist Fascism, which drove us into Iraq over 100% pure Zionist Fascist Treasonous Lies, of which you are a fountain of....

the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel

Every one of you sick treasonous liars who claims 107 happened need to be forced at gunpoint to fly a motorized paraglider for us.


EVERYTHING YOU BLAME on IRAN is really 100% ON YOU AND YOUR ZIONIST FASCISM

 

[BackAgain]

Under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) Iran agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons and allow continuous monitoring of its compliance in exchange for relief from economic sanctions.​

Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018.​

Did Trump's Iran nuclear deal exit affect today's conflict?

President Trump withdrew from the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal in 2018. He broke his 2016 promise to renegotiate the deal. The deal had allowed foreign monitoring in exchange for relief from sanctions, but Trump said it didn’t go far enough.

www.politifact.com

​

As a consequence,​

View attachment 1243412​

‘Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards!’​

View attachment 1243413​

Trump announces Strait of Hormuz blockade​

The cult's defense of their erratic messiah?
View attachment 1243402
"Oh, yeah!
Well, that there Biden..."

Gas prices in the U.S. have recently surpassed $4 per gallon, the highest since 2022, largely influenced by the ongoing Iran war, which has disrupted global oil markets and increased wholesale fuel costs. These fluctuations can occur daily, causing noticeable differences between nearby stations and leaving drivers feeling frustrated.


View attachment 1243426
‘When oil prices go up, we make a lot of money!’
​

​

All absurdity from a biased and ignorant OP.

The agreement simply wasn’t working and Iran was happily and very intentionally ignoring it. We know this because Iran has admitted it.

Shitlips, our dull OP, can’t quite grasp that.

 

[schmidlap]

All absurdity from a biased and ignorant OP.

The agreement simply wasn’t working and Iran was happily and very intentionally ignoring it. We know this because Iran has admitted it.

Shitlips, our dull OP, can’t quite grasp that.

Delusional.

Where are the intelligence reports of Iran weaponizing its stockpile of nuclear materials (that Trump failed to secure) to threaten the United States?

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it was not the intelligence community’s job to establish whether Iran had posed an “imminent threat” to America before the war.​

​

“It is not the intelligence community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat.”​

​

US intelligence agencies 'not responsible for saying if Iran was an imminent threat' | The National

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says only the President can decide what constitutes immediate risk

www.thenationalnews.com

​

​

"Trump says so!", is not a credible answer.​