Anyone see a problem with this?

[Seymour Flops]

Every ONE.

They bought all Trump's Chinese made trinkets, sat through two hours of Trump's rally pity speech, then attacked the capitol?

Then.................Trump and his cult want to pardon them?????????????

Yes, why should they go to prison and stay there for doing what the FBI asked him to do?

When when Pam Bondy and Cash Patel conduct their investigations and find out who ordered those operatives there, they should go to prison and not be parted.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes, why should they go to prison and stay there for doing what the FBI asked him to do?

WTF?

So....the Trump cult are THAT gullible.


Evidently they are, and deserve to be in prison.

When when Pam Bondy and Cash Patel conduct their investigations and find out who ordered those operatives there, they should go to prison and not be parted.

Have at it................"Investigate" for another 4 years, just like the last 4?
Results? 0

 

[Seymour Flops]

WTF?

So....the Trump cult are THAT gullible.


Evidently they are, and deserve to be in prison.

You must have missed the recent election.

Have at it................"Investigate" for another 4 years, just like the last 4?
Results? 0

The FBI and DOJ fully cooperated with those investigations?

No? Four Eight years of stonewalling?

The will cooperate now, or be terminated by Pam.

 

[berg80]

You must have missed the recent election.

The FBI and DOJ fully cooperated with those investigations?

No? Four Eight years of stonewalling?

The will cooperate now, or be terminated by Pam.

Durham's investigation was unencumbered. It fell flat on trump's face.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You must have missed the recent election.

Like I stated.........GULLIBLE.

The FBI and DOJ fully cooperated with those investigations?

No? Four Eight years of stonewalling?

That was the Trump cult.

www.newsweek.com · donald-trump-inner-circleEvery Member of Donald Trump's Inner Circle Facing Contempt ...​

Apr 8, 2022 · The former Trump aide earlier refused to testify before the nine-member panel, citing claims of executive privilege—something the Biden administration has rejected.

The will cooperate now, or be terminated by Pam.

LOL.

 

[berg80]

Trump Disavowed Project 2025 During the Campaign. Not Anymore.​

During the campaign, President-elect Donald J. Trump swore he had “nothing to do with” a right-wing policy blueprint known as Project 2025 that would overhaul the federal government, even though many of those involved in developing the plans were his allies.

Mr. Trump even described many of the policy goals as “absolutely ridiculous.” And during his debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, he said he was “not going to read it.”

Now, as he plans his agenda for his return to the White House, Mr. Trump has recruited at least a half dozen architects and supporters of the plan to oversee key issues, including the federal budget, intelligence gathering and his promised plans for mass deportations.

The shift, his critics say, is not exactly a surprise. Mr. Trump disavowed the 900-page manifesto when polls showed it was extremely unpopular with voters. Now that he has won a second term, they say, he appears to be brushing those concerns aside.

Trump Disavowed Project 2025 During the Campaign. Not Anymore.

President-elect Donald J. Trump has filled his administration with people who have ties to the right-wing manifesto.

www.nytimes.com

Why would he run from the connection to P2025? It's obvious. To dupe voters in to thinking he wouldn't be the extremist he plans to be.

 

[berg80]

Like I stated.........GULLIBLE.

That was the Trump cult.

www.newsweek.com · donald-trump-inner-circleEvery Member of Donald Trump's Inner Circle Facing Contempt ...​

Apr 8, 2022 · The former Trump aide earlier refused to testify before the nine-member panel, citing claims of executive privilege—something the Biden administration has rejected.

LOL.

Stonewalling investigations was routine for the most lawless admin since Grant.

 

[kyzr]

Your FOS, as usual.
Jun 11, 2024 · A previously unreleased video taken on Jan. 6, 2021 shows then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., saying she takes "responsibility" for law enforcement's lack of preparedness

"We have responsibility, Terri. We did not have any accountability for what was going on there. And we should have," Pelosi says in the video, which was reviewed in its original form by Fox News Digital. "This is ridiculous. You’re going to ask me in the middle of the thing when they’ve already breached…that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean the National Guard? Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?"
So............Why was she wondering why the NG wasn't there, if she turned down the request for them to be there?

1. That is NOT the video her daughter shot. Comment on the correct video, here it is, and she takes responsibility

MSN

Nancy Pelosi says ‘I take responsibility’ for not having National Guard at the Capitol on Jan. 6 in video shot by her own daughter​

2. There were two EARLY requests for the DC National Guard, one by Capitol Police Chief Sund that was denied by Sgt. at Arms Irving, Pelosi's direct report, and the request by Trump. Here is the Irving/Sund denial:

Former Capitol Police Chief Says 6 Requests for National Guard Aid Denied Before Riot

House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said.

www.policemag.com

Former Capitol Police Chief Says 6 Requests for National Guard Aid Denied Before Riot​

House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said.
Two days before a riot led to the U.S. Capitol building being breached, Chief Steven Sund of the Capitol Police requested National Guard assistance.
Sund, who has since resigned his post, told the Washington Post his supervisors were reluctant to take formal steps to put the Guard on call even as police intelligence suggested that the crowd President Trump had invited to Washington to protest his defeat probably would be much larger than earlier demonstrations.
House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, Sund said. Meanwhile, Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger suggested that Sund should informally seek out his Guard contacts, asking them to “lean forward” and be on alert in case Capitol Police needed their help.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

1. That is NOT the video her daughter shot. Comment on the correct video, here it is, and she takes responsibility

MSN

Nancy Pelosi says ‘I take responsibility’ for not having National Guard at the Capitol on Jan. 6 in video shot by her own daughter​

2. There were two EARLY requests for the DC National Guard, one by Capitol Police Chief Sund that was denied by Sgt. at Arms Irving, Pelosi's direct report, and the request by Trump. Here is the Irving/Sund denial:

Former Capitol Police Chief Says 6 Requests for National Guard Aid Denied Before Riot

House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said.

www.policemag.com

WTF?
That was what I posted , MORON.
The exact same words.
From FOX, no less.

So...............Why was Pelosi wondering who to call, as the scumbag, traitors were rioting?

Former Capitol Police Chief Says 6 Requests for National Guard Aid Denied Before Riot​

House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said.
Two days before a riot led to the U.S. Capitol building being breached, Chief Steven Sund of the Capitol Police requested National Guard assistance.
Sund, who has since resigned his post, told the Washington Post his supervisors were reluctant to take formal steps to put the Guard on call even as police intelligence suggested that the crowd President Trump had invited to Washington to protest his defeat probably would be much larger than earlier demonstrations.
House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the “optics” of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, Sund said. Meanwhile, Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger suggested that Sund should informally seek out his Guard contacts, asking them to “lean forward” and be on alert in case Capitol Police needed their help.

SO..................Why would ANYONE be in fear of a Trump pity rally?
Bet they will now.

 

[berg80]

Trump plans to nominate Paul Atkins as SEC chair in crypto-friendly move​

President-elect Donald Trump, keeping with his promise for a crypto-friendly administration, plans to nominate former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins to head the agency, according to a Truth Social post.

Currently the CEO at Patomak Global Partners, Atkins is a well-known veteran of the financial world and Republican political circles specifically. He had been widely expected to get the position as the nation’s top financial market regulator.

If confirmed, Atkins would succeed Gary Gensler, a widely reviled figure in the digital currency community for his many efforts to clamp down on the $3.5 trillion crypto market. Trump has promised a easier path for bitcoin and its myriad peers, and the market has soared since his election victory on Nov. 5.

“Paul is a proven leader for common sense regulations. He believes in the promise of robust, innovative capital markets that are responsive to the needs of Investors, & that provide capital to make our Economy the best in the World,” Trump said in a statement. “He also recognizes that digital assets & other innovations are crucial to Making America Greater than Ever Before.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/04/trump-plans-to-nominate-paul-atkins-as-sec-chair.html

What a crazy coincidence since Bone Spurs just started a crypto biz. Which is odd after he bashed crypto for years. But now he has skin in the game so he's all for it. Not that that's corrupt or anything.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump plans to nominate Paul Atkins as SEC chair in crypto-friendly move​

President-elect Donald Trump, keeping with his promise for a crypto-friendly administration, plans to nominate former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins to head the agency, according to a Truth Social post.

Currently the CEO at Patomak Global Partners, Atkins is a well-known veteran of the financial world and Republican political circles specifically. He had been widely expected to get the position as the nation’s top financial market regulator.

If confirmed, Atkins would succeed Gary Gensler, a widely reviled figure in the digital currency community for his many efforts to clamp down on the $3.5 trillion crypto market. Trump has promised a easier path for bitcoin and its myriad peers, and the market has soared since his election victory on Nov. 5.

“Paul is a proven leader for common sense regulations. He believes in the promise of robust, innovative capital markets that are responsive to the needs of Investors, & that provide capital to make our Economy the best in the World,” Trump said in a statement. “He also recognizes that digital assets & other innovations are crucial to Making America Greater than Ever Before.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/04/trump-plans-to-nominate-paul-atkins-as-sec-chair.html

What a crazy coincidence since Bone Spurs just started a crypto biz. Which is odd after he bashed crypto for years. But now he has skin in the game so he's all for it. Not that that's corrupt or anything.

You don’t whine when Democrats do it, so who cares if this hurts your feelings?

Matt Gaetz will not be Attorney General, precisely because he complained about corruption on both sides.

 

[Pappadave1]

A brouhaha absent evidence. Repubs have produced lots of smoke but no fire.

LOL. There's LOTS of evidence. Why else would Biden play golf with Hunter's fellow Burisma "directors."

 

[Pappadave1]

Yes, it was.
The cops should have shot them all.

Well, the "Cops" DID shoot one of them...an unarmed, smiling woman being pushed through a broken window in a door by the three other cops behind her. The shooter must have been TERRIFIED of her.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Well, the "Cops" DID shoot one of them...an unarmed, smiling woman being pushed through a broken window in a door by the three other cops behind her. The shooter must have been TERRIFIED of her.

You're delusional.

 

[berg80]

Federal campaign finance documents that were filed today revealed that Elon Musk spent $250,000,000 on trump's campaign. The man certainly recognizes a business opportunity when he sees one.

 

[Pappadave1]

You're delusional.

I watched in on video, knucklehead.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I watched in on video, knucklehead.

 

[Pappadave1]

So you DIDN'T see the cops on the far right? Get a clue!

 

[Pappadave1]

Try watching the video shot from the SHOOTER'S side of the doors, moron.

 

[berg80]

Tesla — The electric vehicle stock rose nearly 2% after an upgrade to outperform from neutral at Mizuho. The investment firm said Tesla should benefit from expected regulatory changes under the Trump administration, including around autonomous driving. Shares of Tesla were already up 34% in December.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/17/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-premarket-pfe-tsla-sedg-rcat-and-more.html

How great is it to have the prez's ear with billions of dollars on the line. Billions to be spent going after political opponents of the guy who is enriching you.

Elon Musk signals he’ll go beyond supporting Trump to serve as his political enforcer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...ting-trump-to-serve-as-his-political-enforcer