Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,014
- 123,616
- 3,645
Well yes, of course, use of the autopen is fine.I'm good with Trump doing the same as Biden did with the auto pen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well yes, of course, use of the autopen is fine.I'm good with Trump doing the same as Biden did with the auto pen?
Right from the start, I'm no bloody tRumpling.when did you start believing that?
Learn to read.Lies.
To hide the fact that autopen was used, naturally.Learn to read.
The DOJ spokesman admitted they copied a single Trump signature onto the seven pardons.
I've saved this one!Well yes, of course, use of the autopen is fine.
So, riddle me this:
How is one to argue that Biden did not know about or authorize the 1500 commutations he issued in December 2024, when Biden went on TV and announced he was doing it, and announced why he was doing it?
Contrast that to the video of Trump, admitting he had no idea who he pardoned or why.
Actually if the president has no knowledge of the pardon, or even of the person pardoned, that sounds like a case of the presidents chief of staff or aides handing the CEO president a stack of papers to sign. That he does without reading them.So, riddle me this:
Contrast that to the video of Trump, admitting he had no idea who he pardoned or why.
There was a mistake acknowledged and taken responsibility for.The mistake was admitting they were photoshopping Trumps pardons.
Ya say it was done without Biden’s authorization?Um...yeah..thats kind of the point...there is no proof he authorized the autopen.
The president has to specifically authorize its use, if there is no documentation required, how do we know biden have authorizarion? Allegedly, most of everything biden signed was with auto pen. The house report that was put out says people signed things without bidens authorization.
I read the same thing. There is nothing in the Constitution that says it requires a document or a signature from anyone.Actually one law professor said that the public announcement of a pardon, is enough to grant a pardon.
That too.And transcribing the pardon onto paper for admission to a court of law is a mere ministerial act, that can be done by anyone in the administration.
So, riddle me this:
How is one to argue that Biden did not know about or authorize the 1500 commutations he issued in December 2024, when Biden went on TV and announced he was doing it, and announced why he was doing it?
Contrast that to the video of Trump, admitting he had no idea who he pardoned or why.
Ya say it was done without Biden’s authorization?
Prove it
Nonsense. Biden went on television and announced them and announced why he was doing them.Stupid OX. They had emails proving he was not in in it.
Ya say it was done without Biden’s authorization?
Prove it
This on it's face seems strange. That they would have to be high enough up to have direct access to the president, and have talked with him about the pardons. Or they would have had to be the one's to have clandestinely used the presidents auto pen to sign pardons that they had forged.The Oversight committee interviewed his people and they confirmed he did not know.
Autopens are normally used for mass mailings when you can't expect a single person to sign 1000 or more times. When I worked at AARP the director had one but didn't use it on relatively important documents.That is what the autopen is supposed to be for. That and an 'emergency' signature if a piece of legislation or other essential document needs immediate signature when the President is away from the White House. The latter is always documented and confirmed as the order of the President though. I'm reasonably certain that President Trump has not needed to use that in any situation yet though.