Anti-LGBTQ+ ‘groomer’ slur banned on Reddit

[MinTrut]

Ukraine is under attack by a neighboring despot. They deserve all the help and sympathy we can give them.

^ Another Democrat wet for World War III.

 

[MinTrut]

Way to push Putin talking points.

Oh and there are neo-Nazis on both sides Ivan

^ Trolling for WWIII.

 

[whitehall]

What the hell is "reddit"?

 

[MinTrut]

The maid of honor wore a teal gown. The groom BANNED FROM REDDIT

Thread.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats here be like... there is no grooming going on. Democrats are simply teaching young kids in schools about sexual activities Democrats want them to engage in when they get older.

Acknowledging the fact of gay parents is not "teaching about sexual activities"

Do they get taught about the nuts and bolts of sex when they acknowledge their straight parents?

Of course not

 

[TheGreatSatan]

^ Another Democrat wet for World War III.

NYC and SF will be the next Sodom and Gomorrah.

 

[Lesh]

NYC and SF will be the next Sodom and Gomorrah.

Good Lord save us from the Fundies

 

[kaz]

Is Reddit a protector of vulnerable groups, or a liberal echo chamber? Discuss.

Anti-LGBTQ+ 'groomer' slur banned on Reddit in bid to tackle hate speech

Reddit has banned the anti-LGBTQ+ slur "groomer" under its hate speech policy, as well as any reference to LGBTQ+ people as "paedophiles".

www.pinknews.co.uk

Reddit wants the left to own hate speech

 

[MinTrut]

Dude you're acting like an establishment troll

He is one.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

He is one.

The only people who support modern day Democrats are pedos, pervs, foreign enemies, and the trolls they pay to push their propaganda.

 

[marvin martian]

Acknowledging the fact of gay parents is not "teaching about sexual activities"

Do they get taught about the nuts and bolts of sex when they acknowledge their straight parents?

Of course not

Which part is taking school kids to a gay bar?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Anti-LGBTQ+ ‘groomer’ slur banned on Reddit

And?

Private social media are at liberty to edit content as they see fit consistent with the First Amendment right to freedom of the press.

Don’t like it – don’t participate.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You just admitted that I am right.

The whole "groomer" thing is just a bogus politically motivated attack

Correct.

More rightwing lies and demagoguery; more conservative bigotry and hate.

No one is ‘grooming’ children to be gay, transgender, or anything else.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

What the hell is "reddit"?

Today It's a privately owned communist Chinese company who squashes free speech and facts

 

[TheGreatSatan]

And?

Private social media are at liberty to edit content as they see fit consistent with the First Amendment right to freedom of the press.

Don’t like it – don’t participate.

And when Americans see that company and political party protecting child groomers, they should expect to be called out for it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

"Groomer" is a politically motivated attack that played well with focus groups.

Nothing more.

it's cynical politics of the worst kind

Poster thinks teachers are groomers but also potential Spetznatz ready to shoot it out with heavily armed terrorists. But they are still groomers, even if they save the life of your children. Or something.

 

[Lesh]

Whatever u say peter

Peter as in pedophile? Is that what you just said?

 

[Lesh]

You used the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as your source. That isn't going to prove your argument.

Why not?

 

[Lesh]

Which part is taking school kids to a gay bar?

When did that happen?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Peter as in pedophile? Is that what you just said?

Not all all.

Why would you think someone with a name like Pedo Peter is a pedophile?