Anti-Abortion Violence Missing In Government's Main Terrorism Database

[S.J.]

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

They've sent him plenty to sign but it never reached his desk because he told Harry Reid to make sure it never reached the Senate floor. Try being honest for a change.

 

[toxicmedia]

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

They've sent him plenty to sign but it never reached his desk because he told Harry Reid to make sure it never reached the Senate floor. Try being honest for a change.

That's a load of crap

They only sent stuff they knew he would veto. Abortion bills, Obamacare repeals, and crap that gets headlines but doesn't benefit the country.

No jobs bills, no immigration bills, or anything that would make a difference

 

[mikegriffith1]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

HUH? On what planet? Every time Republicans have started to pass something Obama doesn't like, he threatens to veto it and so they table it rather than waste time sending it to him. Most of the time it's been his way or the highway. Just look at what Obama is doing to the budget deal that was reached a few weeks ago: now he's sabotaging it by threatening to veto it unless he gets the changes he wants.

 

[FA_Q2]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Congress is always unruly - even when they share the same party as the president.

One of the presidents core jobs is getting the parties to work together. Obama has been an abysmal failure on that front and has only worsened the divide we face in this nation. When you base your rhetoric on things like 'elections have consequences' then you reap the rewards we have seen. I have no doubt that things would have been massively different had we put another Bill Clinton in office - he knew how to play the political game. Obama does not.

Are the republicans to blame for governments inability to get shit done? Yes they are. That does not change the fact that Obama is as well. After the disasters of the last two divisive presidents, we need someone in office that actually brings people together.

 

[S.J.]

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

They've sent him plenty to sign but it never reached his desk because he told Harry Reid to make sure it never reached the Senate floor. Try being honest for a change.

That's a load of crap

They only sent stuff they knew he would veto. Abortion bills, Obamacare repeals, and crap that gets headlines but doesn't benefit the country.

No jobs bills, no immigration bills, or anything that would make a difference

In other words, they have to ONLY send him things HE wants or they're obstructionists. You are so full of shit I can smell you clear out here.

 

[Londoner]

Rightwing terrorism (white supremacists, anti-government and anti-abortion terrorists) have slaughtered more people (in the USA) since 9/11 than Muslims have.

Problem is: talking about rightwing terrorism doesn't benefit Republican electoral needs and foreign policy goals.

Radical Islamic Terrorism benefits the Right. Their primary electoral claim is to national security - so they have an interest in promoting the very real dangers of Islamic terrorism.

If a rightwing gun nut kills an abortion doctor or blows up a federal building in the midwest bunch of slaughters a bunch of school children, FOX has no interest in giving it much coverage. But if a Muslim gun nut kills people, FOX goes 24/7 for weeks.

It's very transparent and it benefits ISIS.

 

[jknowgood]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Reid for years sat on plenty of bills because he didn't want anything done. Obama wanted to work with republicans? That is laughable. He shoved obamacare through with no Republican an ideas and told the they could ride with him but they would have to sit in the back seat.

 

[Londoner]

One of the presidents core jobs is getting the parties to work together. Obama has been an abysmal failure on that front and has only worsened the divide we face in this nation. When you base your rhetoric on things like 'elections have consequences' then you reap the rewards we have seen. I have no doubt that things would have been massively different had we put another Bill Clinton in office - he knew how to play the political game. Obama does not.

Republicans have no incentive to have their name on anything Obama signs - even if that legislation originated on the Right.

Any type of partnership with Obama is seen as treason. The same will be true if Hillary wins.

Why?

The Republican Party no longer has a centrist wing. Centrism is seen as appeasement. Deal making is exactly what the Tea Party is sick of. They're sick of half measures. Eisenhower, Rockefeller and Bush 43 would not survive the Republican Primaries.

When your opening bid is that the Left is evil & anti-American, you have left zero room for deal making. The mere appearance of wanting to make a deal - any deal - is political suicide.

The new normal is that your name must never appear on legislation signed by the enemy. The legislation itself doesn't matter. A Republican politician simply cannot survive the mere appearance of a partnership with the enemy.

 

[rdean]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

Come on. We have been down this road many times. Stop with the bullshit. Go read up on record number of filibusters and stop being a dipshit.

 

[rdean]

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Reid for years sat on plenty of bills because he didn't want anything done. Obama wanted to work with republicans? That is laughable. He shoved obamacare through with no Republican an ideas and told the they could ride with him but they would have to sit in the back seat.

You to. Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Mitt Romney. Stop the dipshittery. It's disgraceful.

 

[Auld Phart]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

Come on. We have been down this road many times. Stop with the bullshit. Go read up on record number of filibusters and stop being a dipshit.

Which filibustered bill had an addendum in it to add anti-abortionists to the terrorist database?

 

[rdean]

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

HUH? On what planet? Every time Republicans have started to pass something Obama doesn't like, he threatens to veto it and so they table it rather than waste time sending it to him. Most of the time it's been his way or the highway. Just look at what Obama is doing to the budget deal that was reached a few weeks ago: now he's sabotaging it by threatening to veto it unless he gets the changes he wants.

What are you talking about? Jobs's bills? Infrastructure?


Just kidding.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Reid for years sat on plenty of bills because he didn't want anything done. Obama wanted to work with republicans? That is laughable. He shoved obamacare through with no Republican an ideas and told the they could ride with him but they would have to sit in the back seat.

You to. Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Mitt Romney. Stop the dipshittery. It's disgraceful.

Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Romney. You are smoking crack. Obamacare departs from the Heritage/Romney health plan in a number of key respects. How can you not know this?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is it possible that it's because the frequency is non-existent?

No. You're an idiot. What's the minimum number of times an act of terror has to occur before it becomes terrorism?

 

[rdean]

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Reid for years sat on plenty of bills because he didn't want anything done. Obama wanted to work with republicans? That is laughable. He shoved obamacare through with no Republican an ideas and told the they could ride with him but they would have to sit in the back seat.

You to. Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Mitt Romney. Stop the dipshittery. It's disgraceful.

Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Romney. You are smoking crack. Obamacare departs from the Heritage/Romney health plan in a number of key respects. How can you not know this?

Like what? Be specific.

 

[rdean]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

Come on. We have been down this road many times. Stop with the bullshit. Go read up on record number of filibusters and stop being a dipshit.

Which filibustered bill had an addendum in it to add anti-abortionists to the terrorist database?

You don't need a bill to add anti abortionists to the terrorist data base. You only need gun shots, bombs and dead bodies. And we have plenty of those.

 

[Auld Phart]

Remarkable

2009, Dems owned the House, the Senate, and the Oval Office....

but it's the Republicans fault that anti-abortion violence isn't included on a terrorist list.

For all of a couple of months. The Republicans held all three for nearly 5 years and look at the damage they did. They even used reconciliation three times and can't seem to remember what they used it on. No one wants to remember creating deficits.

For all of a couple of months.

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

Come on. We have been down this road many times. Stop with the bullshit. Go read up on record number of filibusters and stop being a dipshit.

Which filibustered bill had an addendum in it to add anti-abortionists to the terrorist database?

You don't need a bill to add anti abortionists to the terrorist data base. You only need gun shots, bombs and dead bodies. And we have plenty of those.

You don't need a bill to add anti abortionists to the terrorist data base.

Someone going to wave a magic wand and make them appear there?

Democrats had the House and Senate for 4 years, under a democrat president for 2 of those years.

Why were they not put on the terrorist list?

How did those mean nasty republicans prevent it?

 

[jknowgood]

Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after.

Held it long enough to force Obamacare and the Stimulus on us.

but they didn't have time to add anti-abortion types to the terrorist list?

I hear that "Dems held Congress for 2 years before Obama took the Oath, and 2 years after" stuff all the time.

The two years after Obama took office are the only part relevant to Obama.

During those 2 years Republican Senators filibustered EVERYTHING they could, in historically unprecedented numbers.

Don't act like Democrats were free to get anything done

Like I said, Obama isn't a leader. That's why he couldn't get anything done.

Obama couldn't get anything done because Republicans have not sent him anything to sign.

Then when he takes executive action, Republicans belly ache about him being a tyrant and violating the Constitution!

Obama's problem is that he is naïve.

He thought "Yes We Can" was something he could unite Democrats and Republicans on. He did not realize that Republicans would say "No we won't"

Washington is tied up right now, and I'm voting Republican for President because it's time Republicans stop blaming Obama, and start working, and see if what they have planned will actually work;

Back seat driving is easy. They can go on all day about "if only he would have"

Reid for years sat on plenty of bills because he didn't want anything done. Obama wanted to work with republicans? That is laughable. He shoved obamacare through with no Republican an ideas and told the they could ride with him but they would have to sit in the back seat.

You to. Obamacare came from the Heritage Foundation and Mitt Romney. Stop the dipshittery. It's disgraceful.

So Republicans are the reason we have Obamacare?

 

[FA_Q2]

Rightwing terrorism (white supremacists, anti-government and anti-abortion terrorists) have slaughtered more people (in the USA) since 9/11 than Muslims have.

Problem is: talking about rightwing terrorism doesn't benefit Republican electoral needs and foreign policy goals.

Radical Islamic Terrorism benefits the Right. Their primary electoral claim is to national security - so they have an interest in promoting the very real dangers of Islamic terrorism.

If a rightwing gun nut kills an abortion doctor or blows up a federal building in the midwest bunch of slaughters a bunch of school children, FOX has no interest in giving it much coverage. But if a Muslim gun nut kills people, FOX goes 24/7 for weeks.

It's very transparent and it benefits ISIS.

Bold claim.

I notice there is nothing backing it up.

 

[FA_Q2]

When your opening bid is that the Left is evil & anti-American, you have left zero room for deal making. The mere appearance of wanting to make a deal - any deal - is political suicide.

Interesting as the left claims the exact same thing - the right is evil and totalitarian.