Nice try, but no. Flipping it around to demand that every Democrat prove that they didn't do something is logically impossible. If I accuse you of punching me in the face, the DA has to prove that you punched me in the face; they can't declare everyone here guilty until a court proves that no forum poster ever punched me in the face—especially if they've already leveled charges 60 times in courts all across the country, to no avail.So, you're arguing that we shouldn't hold Trump responsible for what he may or may not have done, unless he has been found guilty of it in a court of law,I’m still waiting for any evidence of Hillary Clinton’s crimes you keep calling Hillary a criminal but you’ve never produced shred of evidence that she actually committed a crime.
The evidence of Mrs. Clinton's crimes is public and she has claimed she accepted responsibility for her actions re: Benghazi which most thinking folks consider criminal negligence in the performance of her duties as SoS and which directly resulted in the murder of an American ambassador and others. There was also the little matter of her massive security breaches made with her computer that even Obama's head of FBI publicly admitted was criminal but refused to prosecute. Trump has been found legally not guilty in courts of law. Hillary has not.
-- but ---
We should condemn Hillary Clinton for what she may or may not have done, even though she hasn't been found guilty of any of it in a court of law.
Do you see the double standard you are applying here?
So, you're arguing that we shouldn't hold Democrats responsible for election fraud, unless they been found guilty of it in a court of law,
-- but ---
We should condemn Trump for what he may or may not have done, even though he hasn't been found guilty of any of it in a court of law.
Do you see the double standard you are applying here?
But I'll clarify. Most things that people do don't make it to court. Nixon was never found criminally guilty of ordering the Watergate breaking, nor was Clinton for getting a knob shine under the Resolute Desk, but do you think they did them? There is a point at which a reasonable person can infer that yeah, they probably did that, but sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "If it wasn't proven in court, he didn't do it!" is close-minded, at best.
It's exactly the same, stupid fuck. With election fraud, you say it has to be proven in a court or shut up. But with Trump you make wild accusations.
What you're arguing is the typical Democrat argument that you aren't subject to your own standards. The very definition of a double standard
Hillary has never admitted any of the things that you claim. James Comey did not say she broke the law with her server, he said she did not break the law.
Comey was, in fact, very clear that no laws were broken.
Trump has been found guilty on multiple occasions. He’s been barred from being a trustee for any charity because of his abuse of his family charity including using it to make it legal donations to politicians.
Trump settled the fraud trial for $25 million. Even Trump says if you settle something it’s an admission of guilt. Trump has paid fines and settled in multiple cases involving crimes including the federal racial discrimination cases brought in the rate late 70s.
Not to mention that your whole concept of having to prove that you didn’t commit a crime that you haven’t been charged with, is that utterly ridiculous.
But you’re still telling yourself that Hillary is the criminal here.
Try reading my post again, George, our official site Chinese disinformation officer. I didn't say anything about Hillary. This explains your grades, doesn't it?