Podliska, who was fired after nearly 10 months as an investigator for the Republican majority, is now preparing to file a lawsuit against the select committee next month, alleging that he lost his job in part because he resisted pressure to focus his investigative efforts solely on the State Department and Clinton’s role surrounding the Benghazi attack. He also alleges he was fired because he took leave from the committee to fulfill his military service obligations, which would be an unlawful firing.
“I knew that we needed to get to the truth to the victims’ families. And the victims’ families, they deserve the truth — whether or not Hillary Clinton was involved, whether or not other individuals were involved,” he told CNN in an exclusive TV interview that will air Sunday on “State of the Union.” “The victims’ families are not going to get the truth and that’s the most unfortunate thing about this.”
GOP Whistleblower Reveals Benghazi Investigation Is “Partisan Investigation” Of Clinton And They Fired Him
Horse shit.
The investigation OF COURSE took a turn to include questions about the Shrillary private e-mails.
They could be a ******* GOLD MINE of information about Benghazi which she would try to keep well hidden.
**** sake. The matters of Benghazi and Shrillary's private e-mails are not "unrelated," as the liberal Democrap whiners (and misbegotten bogus Republican suck-ups) contend. The matters are very much and legitimately
interwoven.
Shrillary is a dishonest **** and all methods to get to the bottom of how she and Obumbler failed to properly deal with the attack at Benghazi deserve to be explored.
Yeah. Even when this investigation fails to incriminate them, we should start anoher one! And then another one!!! And another!!! Until Hillary says she won't run for President! Then we can stop because mission accomplished.
Your grasp on how investigations work ans should work is tenuous. In any investigation worthy ofthe name, LEADS get followed. Trails of "evidence" get pursued. Where artificial roadblocks have been thrown up making access to required information difficult, they need to get worked around. What might seem to some outsider to be a silly and innocuous question can become the be-all and end-all of any thorough investigation.
When they were conducting the infamous WATERGATE hearings, it was a simple question about a taping system in the Oval Office that led to the downfall of President Nixon. Why? Because it got PURSUED!
Here, what did or did not happen in the decision making arena relative to Benghazi MIGHT be found somewhere in the ******* emails 9which shouldn't have even existed) that Shrillary made, kept and tried to hide.
OF COURSE they need to be looked into.