- Mar 13, 2012
- 41,021
- 15,977
- 2,260
No that is 2 terms too longCongress critters to 4 terms.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No that is 2 terms too longCongress critters to 4 terms.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
It was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The reason SCOTUS found them to be against the constitution is because if they ruled in favor of it. they knew they were next. Life time appointments should be against the constitutionIt was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The only way to make it happen is a new amendment. SCOTUS already found them to be against the constitution.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
The reason SCOTUS found them to be against the constitution is because if they ruled in favor of it. they knew they were next. Life time appointments should be against the constitutionIt was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The only way to make it happen is a new amendment. SCOTUS already found them to be against the constitution.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
The reason SCOTUS found them to be against the constitution is because if they ruled in favor of it. they knew they were next. Life time appointments should be against the constitutionIt was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The only way to make it happen is a new amendment. SCOTUS already found them to be against the constitution.
I agree with that. The Founders had no idea that these fossils would stick around for as long as they do now. That was not part of the plan.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
I do not want the state imposing artificial term limits...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
I believe that choice belongs to the people in the voting booth...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
The reason SCOTUS found them to be against the constitution is because if they ruled in favor of it. they knew they were next. Life time appointments should be against the constitutionIt was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The only way to make it happen is a new amendment. SCOTUS already found them to be against the constitution.
I agree with that. The Founders had no idea that these fossils would stick around for as long as they do now. That was not part of the plan.
Then we need to amend the Constitution. not just ignore it.
The reason SCOTUS found them to be against the constitution is because if they ruled in favor of it. they knew they were next. Life time appointments should be against the constitutionIt was one of his campaign promises, so you can take it to the bank that he will fight to make it happenTrump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
The only way to make it happen is a new amendment. SCOTUS already found them to be against the constitution.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
I do not want the state imposing artificial term limits...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
I believe that choice belongs to the people in the voting booth...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
No term limits GUARANTEE'S that statists control the government. That's the point.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
I do not want the state imposing artificial term limits...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
I believe that choice belongs to the people in the voting booth...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
No term limits GUARANTEE'S that statists control the government. That's the point.
Artificial term limits set by the state GUARANTEE'S to take away the liberty of the individual to make the choice themselves
The problem is not the lack of term limits, it is the laziness and ignorance of the populous. But neither of those things is against the constitution
Trump refuses to be labeled by either party and especially the DC swamp.
Wrong, it makes it easier for the statists to consolidate power so that they control every aspect of elections. Take a look at how the Democrat party controlled the election so that Bernie had no chance to win the Primary. That is statist control of the electoral process and that could only have happened with a long term campaign run by people who have been there for far too long.
Term limits means that the people have a chance to be more involved in the electoral process. Doesn't mean it will happen, just means they have a better chance of it happening.
If you don’t like the republican that the gop are telling you to vote for now wait till you see the next guy they tell you to vote for.Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
I do not want the state imposing artificial term limits...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
I believe that choice belongs to the people in the voting booth...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
No term limits GUARANTEE'S that statists control the government. That's the point.
Artificial term limits set by the state GUARANTEE'S to take away the liberty of the individual to make the choice themselves
The problem is not the lack of term limits, it is the laziness and ignorance of the populous. But neither of those things is against the constitution
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
I disagree with term limits.
I will tell you what I like about Trump which is a 180 from the campaign though. The “we’ll see what happens” comments in terms of complex issues is refreshing. Nobody can say, for example, where we’ll be with NK a year from now. Anyone who says the do is lying and if they do predict it correctly it is because their guess was correct. So Trump is right with the ambiguity. The upshot is that his worldview is wrong, he has no intellectual bandwidth to make informed decisions, he has no bench strength in most departments to execute a winning strategy for the American people, and he has the temperament of a sexually frustrated 9th grader.
The Political Class is desperate to prevent term limits. it means they lose power. Why do you favor the political class over the American people?
Why do you think the American people can’t elect whom they want?
Because the political class prevents Americans from voting for who they care for. Remember the old adage "choosing the lesser of two evils"? You are still voting for evil. The political class only allows the American people to vote for their candidates. That is not how this country was set up. And that is the best thing about this last election. it showed just how corrupt the whole process is.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
Trump <yuck> said something marvelous today.. He spoke in favor of term limiting congresscriters. I have been in favor of this forever.
Congresscriters sticking to the public teat like ticks have botherd me forever. This goes for republicans like McCain as well as Democrats like Kennedy. 20 years and done is a good way of getting new blood into the halls of congress.
They have been talking about this for 100 year...total bullshit. Just red meat to the masses.
Personally I find term limits to be a terrible idea. Who am I to tell someone else they cannot vote for someone they think is doing a great job...very statist to me.
We were given a way to limit terms, it is called elections every two years. That our citizenry has gotten too lazy and stupid to vote people out of office does not in my opinion justify taking away the liberty to vote for whom you want.
Outside of an actual amendment to the constitution, i could never support such a thing
This position is completely out of touch for a person who claims to be anti statist. Just sayin...
I do not want the state imposing artificial term limits...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
I believe that choice belongs to the people in the voting booth...how is that out of touch for an anti-statist?
No term limits GUARANTEE'S that statists control the government. That's the point.
Artificial term limits set by the state GUARANTEE'S to take away the liberty of the individual to make the choice themselves
The problem is not the lack of term limits, it is the laziness and ignorance of the populous. But neither of those things is against the constitution