Another one

[Lisa558]

I have no idea what the **** you’re attempting to babble about, lil g.0005.

And it’s odd to me that a scumbag like you would link my name to your asshole post. Whatever your link may have been remains a mystery.

They want to censor Jews for calling out antisemites, and want to censor out stories of violent savages if they’re black.

Leftists scream for censorship of things they don’t want known, yet insist that Free Speech rules when they’re out chanting Death to Jews.

Hypocrites.

 

[BackAgain]

They want to censor Jews for calling out antisemites, and want to censor out stories of violent savages if they’re black.

Leftists scream for censorship of things they don’t want known, yet insist that Free Speech rules when they’re out chanting Death to Jews.

Hypocrites.

“Rules for thee” is their main objective. Allowing it to be just as applicable to them is out of the question.

I take a little issue with discussing “black savages,” however. If a white person, of an Asian or a person of Hispanic descent, engaged in the vile and violent behavior you’ve discussed, they’d be just as savage.

Other than that, however, I think you’ve nailed it.

 

[Lisa558]

“Rules for thee” is their main objective. Allowing it to be just as applicable to them is out of the question.

I take a little issue with discussing “black savages,” however. If a white person, of an Asian or a person of Hispanic descent, engaged in the vile and violent behavior you’ve discussed, they’d be just as savage.

Other than that, however, I think you’ve nailed it.

Of course they’d be just as savage. My issue is when leftists disallow any discussion of blacks acting like savages, and then hunt through Google to find instances of others - especially whites or Jews - behaving badly.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course they’d be just as savage. My issue is when leftists disallow any discussion of blacks acting like savages, and then hunt through Google to find instances of others - especially whites or Jews - behaving badly.

I know what you were saying and, as I noted previously, overall I agree with you.

I just take exception to arguing that black criminals are “savages” any more or any less than criminals of all races.

The abundance of the shitlib hypocrisy makes your contentions about them absolutely correct.

 

[Lisa558]

I know what you were saying and, as I noted previously, overall I agree with you.

I just take exception to arguing that black criminals are “savages” any more or any less than criminals of all races.

The abundance of the shitlib hypocrisy makes your contentions about them absolutely correct.

I never said they were any more or less savage than criminals of other races. The point is that we have shitlibs hunting for incidences to post of others behaving badly, and then complain when something is posted of black criminals.

Remember that poor woman who was killed at the bus stop in Fairfax, VA by an illegal alien scumbag, with a long arrest record? I posted it to show how the leftists side with illegals - even violent ones - over honest citizens, but because the scumbag was a POC, the forum’s #1 racist popped in to call me a racist for posting about that horrific murder.

 

[BackAgain]

I never said they were any more or less savage than criminals of other races.

True. But my concern is how that word choice can be deliberately distorted by our shitlibs. Savage behavior is savage behavior.

Libs don’t care much anymore for the old notion of a “colorblind” society. But I maintain that there is nothing gained by the adjective “black” before the word, “savages.”

That’s all. Our hotline shitlibs don’t need any help in falsely accusing the rest of us of being “racist.”

The point is that we have shitlibs hunting for incidences to post of others behaving badly, and then complain when something is posted of black criminals.

Remember that poor woman who was killed at the bus stop in Fairfax, VA by an illegal alien scumbag, with a long arrest record? I posted it to show how the leftists side with illegals - even violent ones - over honest citizens, but because the scumbag was a POC, the forum’s #1 racist popped in to call me a racist for posting about that horrific murder.

Yep. And thus my concern for word choice. Our shitlibs are hostile to honest discussion.

 

[Lisa558]

True. But my concern is how that word choice can be deliberately distorted by our shitlibs. Savage behavior is savage behavior.

Libs don’t care much anymore for the old notion of a “colorblind” society. But I maintain that there is nothing gained by the adjective “black” before the word, “savages.”

That’s all. Our hotline don’t need any help in falsely accusing the rest of us of being “racist.”

Yep. And thus my concern for word choice. Our shitlibs are hostile to honest discussion.

Got it! I’ll just stick with the word “savages” without any further descriptors.