These bullets have been around for a long time. They have never been the cause of even one Police fatality. This is is just a test-case for the Communist/Progressive Anti-2nd Amenders. They wanna gauge the reaction. If they can get these bullets banned, they will then move onto other types and calibers.
That's why i always say, Pro-Constitution Americans need to stay vigilant and always be prepared to fight back. Because the Communists/Progressives aren't going away. They will continue to assault Constitutional rights.
PolitiFact says the essence of your and other gun nutters postings on this thread are:
Did I say gun nutters?
IMO there are three types of gun owners. Gun owners like me that exercise our weapons about once a month, to retain our skills and ensure that everything is working properly, gun enthusiasts like my friends that I go to the range with - that go to the range etc. every other Wednesday and-----and gun nutters that go batshit crazy, make shit up, misread the law interpretation(s) and updates of the law, accuse President Obama of passing a law signed by Ronald Reagan... my question earlier in this thread stands; "Why did firearms manufacturers decide to begin manufacturing firearms that they knew (unless they're stupid) would force the ATF, to ban ammo that has been OK for rifles since the 1986 ATF interpretation?"
C'mon easily duped nutters, the question ain't that hard.
Columnist: Obama presses gun control through bullet ban
By Jon Greenberg
March 4th, 2015
Excerpts by Star.
Where the claim comes from
Though we didn’t hear back from Bedard, he’s talking about the ATF’s plan for one particular type of bullet -- a 5.56 mm "green tip." It is found in SS109 and M855 cartridges, and it’s one of the more popular types of ammunition in America, experts told us.
But this February, the ATF announced a proposal to remove an exemption that allowed gun owners to use this particular kind of ammunition. The agency’s reasoning? It can pierce the sort of body armor often worn by police, and
it can be fired from a handgun.
The ammunition isn’t new, nor is its ability to pierce body armor.
What is new is that gun manufacturers are making handguns that use a 5.56 mm "green tip."
That, ATF says, violates the
Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1985 that aimed to ban armor piercing bullets.
"The AR-based handguns and rifles utilize the same magazines and share identical receivers," the ATF wrote in an
explanatory brief. "These AR-type handguns were not commercially available when the armor piercing ammunition exemption was granted in 1986. To ensure consistency, upon final implementation of the sporting purpose framework outlined above, ATF must withdraw the exemptions for 5.56 mm "green tip" ammunition, including both the SS109 and M855 cartridges."
Our ruling
Bedard said Obama was using executive action to impose gun control through a ban on certain bullets.
An executive agency, the ATF, has proposed removing an exemption for a specific type of ammunition because gun manufacturers have started selling handguns that fire the rounds. That
violates a 1986 federal law, the ATF says, aimed at protecting police from armor piercing bullets.
Bedard’s shorthanding this as "executive action" is misleading, though Obama does support the proposal.
Also, it’s worth noting that the ban would not amount to gun control per se; the ATF notes that
168 other varieties of bullets will work in the sameweapons. The primary impact would be a higher price for ammunition. And while Bedard says the move targets the rifle version, it is the pistol version and the cartridges it uses that lie at the center of the ATF proposal.
The claim contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give another impression. We rate it Mostly False.
Nutters go nuts over "gun control" even though "the ATF notes that
168 other varieties of bullets will work in the same weapons."
and-----and the same weapons remain --- on the market.
.