Another Nail In The Warmist's Coffin

[PoliticalChic]

If directed by the famous scientist/climatologist, Sean Hannity, right wingers will readily and forcibly deny the existence of gravity.

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Manonthestreet]

freeman dyson is a 93 year old mathematician, not a climate scientist.

and Lemonick is a journalist, not a scientist.

Yeah cause theres no math in climate science....plus he's a deniar so how dumb is he

 

[jc456]

If directed by the famous scientist/climatologist, Sean Hannity, right wingers will readily and forcibly deny the existence of gravity.

I love it when the warmer/doomers get tongue tied.

 

[mamooth]

Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.

Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.

Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.

 

[jc456]

Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.

Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.

Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.

so again, is this because you say so, or do you actually have any evidence?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.

Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.

Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.

So.....how does it feel to be good at no fields?


Tough being a warmist, and no warming for 18 years, huh?

 

[nat4900]

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

 

[jc456]

so jc says there is no global warming by adding 20 PPM of CO2 in the air.

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

and like a warmer/doomer, you can't provide any evidence to support your position. So, how is it you prove your position?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

Really?

So that's why the global governance crowd, the United Nations, is all for it?

Gads, you're a dunce.



Try this for a dose of reality:

Mike Hulme is Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA), [http://mikehulme.org/] and was good enough to reveal the truth in the Guardian, 2007:
“…this particular mode of scientific activity… has been labelled "post-normal" science. Climate change seems to fall in this category. Disputes in post-normal science focus as often on the process of science - who gets funded, who evaluates quality, who has the ear of policy - as on the facts of science…. Self-evidently dangerous climate change will not emerge from a normal scientific process of truth seeking,… scientists - and politicians - must trade (normal) truth for influence. If scientists want to remain listened to, to bear influence on policy, they must recognise the social limits of their truth seeking and reveal fully the values and beliefs they bring to their scientific activity…. Climate change is too important to be left to scientists - least of all the normal ones.” The appliance of science.

¬ So global warming theory did not seek to establish the truth through evidence. Instead, truth had to be traded for influence: scientists presented beliefs as a basis for policy. The shame: science has been junked in the interest of promoting ideological conviction.

 

[nat4900]

Like I've already stated, you right wing dunces are basing your denial on right wing politics....and NOT objective science.

Hey, maybe in your lifetime some right wing politician will convince you...for myself, this forum is not a good venue to educate ideological morons

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

^ Global Warming "Science"

LOL

I'm convinced, let's spend $76 trillion on less reliable, more expensive "green energy"!!
Gotta cut temps in 2080 by 0.1 degrees, or we're doomed!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007. Deniers seem to be running out of material, if they have to resort to recycling such nonsense.

Linus Pauling pushed Vitamin C quackery. Being good in one field is no guarantee of not being a clown in another. Dyson is pushing the same nonsense denier myths that have been debunked here hundreds of times. Stupid stuff coming from a smart guy is no less stupid.

Good luck with those coffin nails. Pounding on them since 2007 has done jack, but that's probably because denier faith was insufficiently pure. You just need to _believe_ harder, and all will be well.

Dyson has been failing at Climate Science since 2007.

Why, did he miss the pause?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Like I've already stated, you right wing dunces are basing your denial on right wing politics....and NOT objective science.

Hey, maybe in your lifetime some right wing politician will convince you...for myself, this forum is not a good venue to educate ideological morons

Post #29: the East Anglia Professor of Climate Change admitted that there is no science to global warming: it is politics.

And aimed at convincing the less astute.
Raise your paw.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

What's wrong, are we intruding on your territory? LOL!

 

[flacaltenn]

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

Really?

So that's why the global governance crowd, the United Nations, is all for it?

Gads, you're a dunce.



Try this for a dose of reality:

Mike Hulme is Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA), [http://mikehulme.org/] and was good enough to reveal the truth in the Guardian, 2007:
“…this particular mode of scientific activity… has been labelled "post-normal" science. Climate change seems to fall in this category. Disputes in post-normal science focus as often on the process of science - who gets funded, who evaluates quality, who has the ear of policy - as on the facts of science…. Self-evidently dangerous climate change will not emerge from a normal scientific process of truth seeking,… scientists - and politicians - must trade (normal) truth for influence. If scientists want to remain listened to, to bear influence on policy, they must recognise the social limits of their truth seeking and reveal fully the values and beliefs they bring to their scientific activity…. Climate change is too important to be left to scientists - least of all the normal ones.” The appliance of science.

¬ So global warming theory did not seek to establish the truth through evidence. Instead, truth had to be traded for influence: scientists presented beliefs as a basis for policy. The shame: science has been junked in the interest of promoting ideological conviction.

I thank you for that.. Never saw it before. Beautifully stated. And to think -- he has to work in the same University as the British God-Father of GW hysteria -- Phil Jones.. Just in case you haven't seen this brilliant climate wizard in action -- I'll return the favor with this pic of him at work. This is no joke -- aired in a Nova documentary on CC. THIS -- is one of the top 10 climate scientists in the world today..

So now you can understand how he "loses his data sets" and can't make them available for others to verify..

 

[Billy_Bob]

"warmists" ?

Am I wrong in my perception that you nip around the edges without ever actually posting a direct contradiction to posts?

Left wits avoid facts... they like being told what to do, where to live, what to eat, etc.... Thy are low information types who do what they are told because it requires no thinking or a cognitive thought process..

And when it comes to Climate alarmism they are even stupider than that.. they swallow obvious lies, hook, line and sinker... They dont feel good unless they are getting hand outs which were stolen from real people who work. they are giddy about giving up your freedoms because their to lazy to keep their own..

 

[Old Rocks]

Freeman Dyson is simply wrong. And the warming world will prove that.

Those who have extensively studied atmospheric physics, and whose predictions have been verified are the people that one should listen to. The leading such person at present is Dr. James Hansen. And he has been on the recieving end of much hate because of it.

It is interesting to see the deniers flap-yap constantly changing. First there was no warming. But it became so obvious to everyone that there was, that they then changed that to 'well, it all natural'. Then there is no sea rise, now it's 'well, the sea has been rising for so many thousands of years'.

We have a bit more than a year before there is a major political election in this nation. We have one political party actively denying that AGW is real. Period. And we have a very strong El Nino, already we have had major flooding in Texas and the Carolina's. As well as a record drought for the West Coast, which has resulted in wild fires that have destroyed thousands of homes, and several towns were saved only through heroic efforts on the part of the firefighters. We had DC-10's laying down retardant on neighborhoods. There is a very good chance that the California drought will be ended with major storms. In other words, we have had major infrastructure destroyed by weather from coast to coast, and it looks like there is much more to come. But one major political party simply states this is not happening. It will be discussed extensively next year. You have made it political, and political it will be.

 

[Old Rocks]

"warmists" ?

Am I wrong in my perception that you nip around the edges without ever actually posting a direct contradiction to posts?

Left wits avoid facts... they like being told what to do, where to live, what to eat, etc.... Thy are low information types who do what they are told because it requires no thinking or a cognitive thought process..

And when it comes to Climate alarmism they are even stupider than that.. they swallow obvious lies, hook, line and sinker... They dont feel good unless they are getting hand outs which were stolen from real people who work. they are giddy about giving up your freedoms because their to lazy to keep their own..

Billy Bob, you are the best advertisement for the ignorance of the 'Conservative' on this board. Your El Nino predictions have been humorously wrong, and your lies concerning your educational background a hoot to all that have read them.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Among your problems is the fact that it isn't Sean Hannity....

...it's Freeman Dyson

Freeman John Dyson...]theoretical physicist and mathematician, known for his work inquantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering. Dyson is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists."
Freeman Dyson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've always found interesting that GW deniers are, for the most part, basing their "belief" MORE on political leanings and LESS on the available science.

Like a drowning person, GW deniers will cling to ANYTHING (such as one out of thousands of other scientists) that supports their mantra,

In a recent Dyson interview on his GW skepticism, the interviewer stated: "Whatever else he is, Dyson is the good scientist; he asks the hard questions. He could also be a lonely prophet. Or, as [Dyson himself acknowledged] he could be dead wrong."

OK retard...

Below are two rates of warming from the Hadcrut3 lower troposphere. One is from the period 1900 through 1950 and the the other is 1951 through 2000. Below each is the rate of warming.

The trend for the period 1900-1950 is 0.51 deg C or 0.103/decade

This trend occurred before CO2 became a rapidly increasing according to the IPCC and is near or is the Natural Variation rate.

The trend for 1951-2000 is 0.50 deg C or 0.100 deg C/decade.

This means that the two rates of warming are statistically insignificant DESPITE the rapid rise in CO2 and equal to NATURAL VARIATION..

So by simple observation we can see the problem with the hypothesis of runaway temp caused by CO2. During the time they claim runway rise it was nothing of the sort and even given the rise in CO2 there was no discernible increase in that natural rise.

SO tell us how you ascertained that CO2 was was causing warming, catastrophic warming... The empirical evidence calls you a liar who has no empirical facts.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Old fraud once again proving he is ignorant of simple facts and he doesn't have a clue how the earths systems work.. It's hilarious you post other peoples work and claim that you know better..