Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare

Clementine

Platinum Member
Dec 18, 2011
12,919
4,826
350
The proposed solutions to global warming are nothing but a plan to redistribute wealth. This is something the left has dreamed of for decades. It was recommended by radicals ages ago that the way to bring it about would be coming up with a "crisis" of global proportions.

By constantly ridiculing those who question the science, the left has managed to avoid discussing the real scam, which is their plan to start the largest wealth redistribution in history under the guise of saving the planet. The solutions don't do anything other than transfer wealth, which is the real goal. This is why they are so desperate and why they are trying to brainwash students. All books that either question or try to balance the debate have been removed from schools. The DOJ wants to prosecute anyone who wants to debate it.

The solutions don't get discussed nearly as much as the flawed science behind the theories. Even if we were to say, for the sake of argument, that it's real, the plan for stopping or reversing it is a total myth and has nothing to do with climate. It's the solution we need to stop.



"Fraud
: While the global warming alarmists have done a good job of spreading fright, they haven’t been so good at hiding their real motivation. Yet another one has slipped up and revealed the catalyst driving the climate scare.

We have been told now for almost three decades that man has to change his ways or his fossil-fuel emissions will scorch Earth with catastrophic warming. Scientists, politicians and activists have maintained the narrative that their concern is only about caring for our planet and its inhabitants. But this is simply not true. The narrative is a ruse. They are after something entirely different.

If they were honest, the climate alarmists would admit that they are not working feverishly to hold down global temperatures — they would acknowledge that they are instead consumed with the goal of holding down capitalism and establishing a global welfare state.

Have doubts? Then listen to the words of former United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:

"One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.



So what is the goal of environmental policy?

"We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.

For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn’t really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he also said that "the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated."

Mad as they are, Edenhofer’s comments are nevertheless consistent with other alarmists who have spilled the movement’s dirty secret. Last year, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, made a similar statement.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," she said in anticipation of last year’s Paris climate summit.

"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

The plan is to allow Third World countries to emit as much carbon dioxide as they wish — because, as Edenhofer said, "in order to get rich one has to burn coal, oil or gas" — while at the same time restricting emissions in advanced nations. This will, of course, choke economic growth in developed nations, but they deserve that fate as they "have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community," he said. The fanaticism runs so deep that one professor has even suggested that we need to plunge ourselves into a depression to fight global warming.

Perhaps Naomi Klein summed up best what the warming the fuss is all about in her book "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate."

"What if global warming isn’t only a crisis?" Klein asks in a preview of a documentary inspired by her book. "What if it’s the best chance we’re ever going to get to build a better world?"

In her mind, the world has to "change, or be changed" because an "economic system" — meaning free-market capitalism — has caused environmental "wreckage."

This is how the global warming alarmist community thinks. It wants to frighten, intimidate and then assume command. It needs a "crisis" to take advantage of, a hobgoblin to menace the people, so that they will beg for protection from the imaginary threat. The alarmists’ "better world" is one in which they rule a global welfare state. They’ve admitted this themselves."


http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/another-climate-alarmist-admits-real-motive-behind-warming-scare/


Lynch and Obama want to investigate and prosecute anyone who questions their global warming theories.

"Five Republican senators have sent a letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking her to "immediately cease" using law enforcement resources to go after those who disagree with President Barack Obama on global warming.

"These actions provide disturbing confirmation that government officials at all levels are threatening to wield the sword of law enforcement to silence debate on climate change," Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah, Jeff Sessions of Alabama, David Perdue of Georgia and David Vitter of Louisiana wrote to Lynch.

"As you well know, initiating criminal prosecution for a private entity’s opinions on climate change is a blatant violation of the First Amendment and an abuse of power that rises to the level of prosecutorial misconduct," the senators wrote.

The letter comes after Lynch told a Senate committee in March the Justice Department had internal discussions about investigating global warming skeptics based on letters sent by Democratic lawmakers in 2015."



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/26/senators-demand-doj-stop-investigating-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz49pmoRTqF
 
Absolutely. It's not as if warming is having any measurable effect...

Australia scrubbed from UN climate change report after government intervention

http://www.theguardian.com

Every reference to Australia was scrubbed from the final version of a major UN report on climate change after the Australian government intervened, objecting that the information could harm tourism.

Guardian Australia can reveal the report “World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate”, which Unesco jointly published with the United Nations environment program and the Union of Concerned Scientists on Friday, initially had a key chapter on the Great Barrier Reef, as well as small sections on Kakadu and the Tasmanian forests.

But when the Australian Department of Environment saw a draft of the report, it objected, and every mention of Australia was removed by Unesco. Will Steffen, one of the scientific reviewers of the axed section on the reef, said Australia’s move was reminiscent of “the old Soviet Union”.

No sections about any other country were removed from the report. The removals left Australia as the only inhabited continent on the planet with no mentions.

Explaining the decision to object to the report, a spokesperson for the environment department told Guardian Australia: “Recent experience in Australia had shown that negative commentary about the status of world heritage properties impacted on tourism.”

As a result of climate change combined with weather phenomena, the Great Barrier Reef is in the midst of the worst crisis in recorded history. Unusually warm water has caused 93% of the reefs along the 2,300km site to experience bleaching. In the northern most pristine part, scientists think half the coral might have died.
 
The other day I had a bad headache......yet I somehow still blame global warming for it, LOL!
 
Absolutely. It's not as if warming is having any measurable effect...

Australia scrubbed from UN climate change report after government intervention

http://www.theguardian.com

Every reference to Australia was scrubbed from the final version of a major UN report on climate change after the Australian government intervened, objecting that the information could harm tourism.

Guardian Australia can reveal the report “World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate”, which Unesco jointly published with the United Nations environment program and the Union of Concerned Scientists on Friday, initially had a key chapter on the Great Barrier Reef, as well as small sections on Kakadu and the Tasmanian forests.

But when the Australian Department of Environment saw a draft of the report, it objected, and every mention of Australia was removed by Unesco. Will Steffen, one of the scientific reviewers of the axed section on the reef, said Australia’s move was reminiscent of “the old Soviet Union”.

No sections about any other country were removed from the report. The removals left Australia as the only inhabited continent on the planet with no mentions.

Explaining the decision to object to the report, a spokesperson for the environment department told Guardian Australia: “Recent experience in Australia had shown that negative commentary about the status of world heritage properties impacted on tourism.”

As a result of climate change combined with weather phenomena, the Great Barrier Reef is in the midst of the worst crisis in recorded history. Unusually warm water has caused 93% of the reefs along the 2,300km site to experience bleaching. In the northern most pristine part, scientists think half the coral might have died.


The real debate is the so-called solution. Massive wealth redistribution and unimaginable transfer of power to government is the goal and they are falsely claiming that it's all about climate. Alinsky would be proud to see what they came up with for the "global crisis" to use as a catalyst for carrying out their dream of controlling us. Read the article that explains what the real plan is. You can debate global warming all day long, but don't avoid commenting on their answer to it. Even the alarmists have admitted that there will be no measurable difference even after trillions are redistributed. The really bad part is that Goldman Sachs (the real 1%) are going to make out like bandits on the "trade" part of cap and trade. The money will be used to keep certain people in power.
 
Last edited:
I stopped taking the Global Warming thing seriously when, immediately after the Paris massacre, the nut Bernie Sanders and his animal-thug supporters blamed it for Islamic terrorism.....even though Pisslam was a genocidal bloodbath for 1200 YEARS BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL STARTED PUMPING CO2 INTO THE AIR IN THE 1800's!
 
The real debate is the so-called solution. Massive wealth redistribution and unimaginable transfer of power to government is the goal and they are falsely claiming that it's all about climate.
So tell me, do you put your foil on shiny side in or out?

But if the debate is the solution, what is your solution to the Great Barrier Reef decline?
 
Why on earth would I read an article for dumb fuck rightards paid for by ff interests? One can guarantee it's not going to have a solution to global warming in it. Well, burn more coal perhaps.
 
I stopped taking the Global Warming thing seriously when, immediately after the Paris massacre, the nut Bernie Sanders and his animal-thug supporters blamed it for Islamic terrorism.....even though Pisslam was a genocidal bloodbath for 1200 YEARS BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL STARTED PUMPING CO2 INTO THE AIR IN THE 1800's!
Well that's good, you allowed a politician to get you to ignore climate scientists. Another dumb fuck rightard.
 
The spotted owl, deformed frogs, the hole in the ozone layer, now global warming the latest in a line of fabricated nonsense. Liberals are liars, they have to lie because the only way they can get people to go along with their stupid shit is to scare them with some fabricated crisis. The left HATES corporations and this is how they attack them.
 
I just read where progressive liberal board members of a school have banned any reading material disputing global warming.

"Evil teaches 'tolerance' until it becomes the majority...then it seeks to silence 'good'."
 

Forum List

Back
Top