He was reaching for a gun, you can see it in the video... No, there wasn't a gun there but he wanted them to think it was....so they shot him....
This makes exactly no sense..
If he didn't have a gun, what would be the upside of making the police think he
did? There's not an iota of logic in that line of reasoning...
Plus he has a criminal record, so that makes it justified....
In what jurisdiction does someone's criminal record justify them being shot in the back seven times? I'm not arguing that the guy wasn't a scumbag, but your statement is simply not true. His criminal record does not justify this cop shooting him.
But, please, go ahead and cite the law(s) in Kenosha, Wisconsin which state that a suspect's criminal record justifies him being shot.
We'll wait...
and his kids were in the car, they too could have been armed...
Absolutely...