a prisoner exchange doesn't exactly cover what i'm talking about.so you'd kill every palestinian to protect one israeli? did i get that right?The same Palestinians that tried killed Jews? I'm okay with that..and no I don't give a damn if they all die instead of Israeli kid, sorry.i think the palestinians displaced in 1948 would disagree with that assessment.So if the government takes your stuff and gives it to someone else, you are going to be totally good with that?
Er, Joe, Israel has existed in one form or another for 3700 years. If anything, you are wanting to take Israel's stuff and give it to Palestine.
Yes, you are most assuredly "okay with that."
and you've yet to tell me how many innocents are acceptable collateral damage when pursuing a militant.
When Gilad Shalit was freed by Hamas, it was because Israel released 50 Palestinians. Israel felt Shalit's life was worth the lives of 50 Palestinians. So there you have it. Israel places more value on its own citizens than on the lives of cowardly terrorists. Good!
The poetic justice in all of that is when those teenagers were killed in Gush Etzion, those 50 prisoners were re-arrested in Operation Brother's Keeper.
let's say that the two men who committed the synagogue murders were hiding.
how many innocent palestinians would be acceptable collateral damage?