And this is why Blacks Don't Vote Republican

They really funny part is it's the dems that are replacing the blacks with Hispanics.

Within a couple of generations blacks will have about as much political pull as Native Americans.

Of course with the blacks killing themselves off in wholesale lots though abortion and general thuggery it might be even sooner.
Nobody is being replaced and 3-4 times more whites commit suicide annually than blacks who are killing each other. Whites are the ones losing political clout. That's why you cucks whine about anti white racism.
 
I thought this was Zone 1?

It's your thread, my dude. Since your premise is that the ruling must be wrong and therefore based on racism, it's up to you to stop hiding in the woodpile and show us the evidence.

Groups were using literacy tests to stop folks like you* from voting for well over sixty years, but that does not mean it was legal.

*Meaning illiterate people, not black people. I have no evidence you are black.
Again, the fact this was done since the act was passed, you find where it says that it can't be done. It is apparent what this is.
 
Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

A silly post bereft of current data AND THIS IS CURRENT AS CAN BE
18 hours ago — A November NBC News poll indicates 20% of Black voters would consider selecting Donald Trump in next year's presidential election.
 
Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

Blacks vote Democrat because Blacks are part of the most heavily propagandized citizenry in history.

This propaganda falsely claims that Democrats (who burned COC to the ground during the Trump-hysteria fueled CovidCon) care about COC.

The Democrats are one of two major criminal gangs raping We the People on a daily basis.
 
Nobody is being replaced and 3-4 times more whites commit suicide annually than blacks who are killing each other. Whites are the ones losing political clout. That's why you cucks whine about anti white racism.
LOL.....Damn, talk about some self-reflection on your part being in order there! :laughing0301:

OIP.fgSOGEoGOZ3yf-ZD1g3SQgAAAA
 
Dude, realy?

Read that opinion, then think about what it means and other things like it.

This isn't rocket science.
I read it. You want to explain how his 8th circuit opinion would lead the Negro to resent Republicans? It's not rocket science, so explain it.
 
Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

You speak for your biased self. Others don't feel the same.

 
Again, the fact this was done since the act was passed, you find where it says that it can't be done. It is apparent what this is.
So, you completely missed my analogy about the literacy tests that were done for decades before the courts found them unlawful? Or do you believe that they are lawful because they "was done?"

I guess you really would have failed the literacy test.

Davis v. Schnell came just in time for you, huh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top