And The Truth Finally Comes Out: Dems Vow To Push Russia Story Through 2018 Elections

[Weatherman2020]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

So again, ask Chicago Jesus why he allowed Russia to hack the election while he told America no such hacking was occurring. Was that part of the flexibility after the election he told Putin?

Chicago Jebus. I thought he was the Kenyan Messiah? Look a Squirrel!

I think that's ground for another investigation.

Lock him up
Lock him up
......

That your best answer to why Obama let the Russians do so much damage?

 

[konradv]

Why shouldn't they? Was the Benghazi 'story' pushed into 2014?

Whitewater was pushed for Clinton's entire eight years! OP thinks we have as bad a memory as his!

Gee, and almost everyone involved EXCEPT the Clintons went to jail. how 'convenient'.

For Whitewater? I guess your acolytes' memories are as flawed as your own, so you can get away with bald-faced lies.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You say that as though we don't have counter-terrorism measures already in place.

Obama knew of the Russians' efforts...supposedly...and it has been proven he did nothing.

Comey, the fierce prosecutor...who was shocked into inaction by a President who told him he HOPED the Flynn investigation that had proven no criminal activity could be let go...was the head of the nation's counter-terrorism effort. If Comey was as inept in that role as he was as head of the FBI that would explain how the Russians hacked the DNC e-mails. (That and the fact that Hillary's campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB Bank and the Russian Spy agency that supposedly did the hacking )

"Supposedly" from a rightard means everything that follows is made up.

“In early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn’t happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and [that] there were going to be serious consequences if he didn’t.

“And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process.”

 

[BlindBoo]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

 

[Weatherman2020]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

So Obama lied again.

Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

 

[Faun]

You say that as though we don't have counter-terrorism measures already in place.

Obama knew of the Russians' efforts...supposedly...and it has been proven he did nothing.

Comey, the fierce prosecutor...who was shocked into inaction by a President who told him he HOPED the Flynn investigation that had proven no criminal activity could be let go...was the head of the nation's counter-terrorism effort. If Comey was as inept in that role as he was as head of the FBI that would explain how the Russians hacked the DNC e-mails. (That and the fact that Hillary's campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB Bank and the Russian Spy agency that supposedly did the hacking )

"Supposedly" from a rightard means everything that follows is made up.

“In early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn’t happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and [that] there were going to be serious consequences if he didn’t.

“And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process.”

Moron, by that time, the hacking had already occurred.

 

[easyt65]

There were no lies.

BULLSHIT.

Obama and Hillary blamed a video and called the terrorist attack a 'protest that got out of hand', much like Obama called the Ft, Hood terrorist attack a 'case of workplace violence'.

FACT: The State Department Lead in Tripoli testified that when the attack on the compound started he called the State Department and talked to HILLARY, telling her this was a TERRORIST ATTACK.

FACT: The CIA filed a report within an hour of the attack beginning, sending it to the WH War Room and the State Department according to CIA testimony, a report in which they declared the attack to be a TERRORIST ATTACK. At the State Department it was reported / testified to that the report was modified 13 times, EVERY REFERENCE TO TERRORISM STRIPPED FROM THE REPORT.

FACT: The investigation that involved on-sight investigation and interviews of witnesses there when the attack started stated there was NEVER any sign of a protest, that this was a straight-up terrorist attacks, just like the 2 previous attacks in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12.

FACT: Hillary Clinton's own e-mails that were recovered showed she e-mails the Turkish Ambassador, telling him, "We KONW this was a TERRORIST ATTACK and that the video had nothing to do with it". These are Hillary Clinton's own words admitting they knew the story about a video was a LIE. Another of Hillary's e-mails was to her daughter stating the same thing.

The FACT is that Obama - who was up for re-election - and Hillary - who had aspirations of running for President in 2016 - lied their assess off to the American people rather than coming forward and being honest, by telling Americans the Benghazi compound attack was a terrorist attack that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans.

You snowflakes can spin your asses off...and I have seen some truly remarkable tales...bt THAT is the fact of the matter.

'There were no lies' my ass!

Barry lied to the American people about the smallest things...like 'the ACA won't cost a dime'....this was a huge-ass lie to protect his re-election bid. Anyone who denies that, IMO, is as stupid as Gruber declared Democrats think American citizens are.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You say that as though we don't have counter-terrorism measures already in place.

Obama knew of the Russians' efforts...supposedly...and it has been proven he did nothing.

Comey, the fierce prosecutor...who was shocked into inaction by a President who told him he HOPED the Flynn investigation that had proven no criminal activity could be let go...was the head of the nation's counter-terrorism effort. If Comey was as inept in that role as he was as head of the FBI that would explain how the Russians hacked the DNC e-mails. (That and the fact that Hillary's campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB Bank and the Russian Spy agency that supposedly did the hacking )

"Supposedly" from a rightard means everything that follows is made up.

“In early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn’t happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and [that] there were going to be serious consequences if he didn’t.

“And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process.”

Moron, by that time, the hacking had already occurred.

Your comrade here in the thread says 39 states were hacked on election day.
So which one of you is lying?

 

[easyt65]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

So Obama lied again.

Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

BUH-BAM!

GAME, SET, AND MATCH...

 

[Faun]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

So Obama lied again.

Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

Nope, your rightwing source is lying. Obama said they did hack the election but that he saw no evidence of vote tampering. It's not his problem you're too ignorant to comprehend the two are not mutually exclusive.

 

[g5000]

The GOP has no right to complain. Birthers, Benghazi, e-mails, ACA repeal... all political shenanigans dropped the second the election was over.

Yep. I warned the pseudocons their own bullshit would come back and bitch slap them in their own faces.

 

[g5000]

The truth will most certainly out: Silence From The Great Babbler

 

[Faun]

There were no lies.

BULLSHIT.

Obama and Hillary blamed a video and called the terrorist attack a 'protest that got out of hand', much like Obama called the Ft, Hood terrorist attack a 'case of workplace violence'.

FACT: The State Department Lead in Tripoli testified that when the attack on the compound started he called the State Department and talked to HILLARY, telling her this was a TERRORIST ATTACK.

FACT: The CIA filed a report within an hour of the attack beginning, sending it to the WH War Room and the State Department according to CIA testimony, a report in which they declared the attack to be a TERRORIST ATTACK. At the State Department it was reported / testified to that the report was modified 13 times, EVERY REFERENCE TO TERRORISM STRIPPED FROM THE REPORT.

FACT: The investigation that involved on-sight investigation and interviews of witnesses there when the attack started stated there was NEVER any sign of a protest, that this was a straight-up terrorist attacks, just like the 2 previous attacks in the weeks leading up to 9/11/12.

FACT: Hillary Clinton's own e-mails that were recovered showed she e-mails the Turkish Ambassador, telling him, "We KONW this was a TERRORIST ATTACK and that the video had nothing to do with it". These are Hillary Clinton's own words admitting they knew the story about a video was a LIE. Another of Hillary's e-mails was to her daughter stating the same thing.

The FACT is that Obama - who was up for re-election - and Hillary - who had aspirations of running for President in 2016 - lied their assess off to the American people rather than coming forward and being honest, by telling Americans the Benghazi compound attack was a terrorist attack that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans.

You snowflakes can spin your asses off...and I have seen some truly remarkable tales...bt THAT is the fact of the matter.

'There were no lies' my ass!

Barry lied to the American people about the smallest things...like 'the ACA won't cost a dime'....this was a huge-ass lie to protect his re-election bid. Anyone who denies that, IMO, is as stupid as Gruber declared Democrats think American citizens are.

You imbeciles just never learn. Despite 8 GOP-led investigations, you still don't learn. <smh>

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf​

 

[BlindBoo]

Benghazi was real you dumb ass retard liberals. Hello dead ambassador, fake news youtube video excuse, blatant lies from Obama administration. Russia on the other hand is a fake news bullshit nothing burger. It had no effect on the election.

That's funny. Of course it was real. So was the Russian attack on our election. It's only a coincidence that the so-called President is pro-Russia and is actively trying to weaken the NATO alliance.

 

[Faun]

You say that as though we don't have counter-terrorism measures already in place.

Obama knew of the Russians' efforts...supposedly...and it has been proven he did nothing.

Comey, the fierce prosecutor...who was shocked into inaction by a President who told him he HOPED the Flynn investigation that had proven no criminal activity could be let go...was the head of the nation's counter-terrorism effort. If Comey was as inept in that role as he was as head of the FBI that would explain how the Russians hacked the DNC e-mails. (That and the fact that Hillary's campaign manager's brother was working for the KGB Bank and the Russian Spy agency that supposedly did the hacking )

"Supposedly" from a rightard means everything that follows is made up.

“In early September when I saw President Putin in China, I felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn’t happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and [that] there were going to be serious consequences if he didn’t.

“And in fact, we did not see further tampering of the election process.”

Moron, by that time, the hacking had already occurred.

Your comrade here in the thread says 39 states were hacked on election day.
So which one of you is lying?

Neither.

 

[NightFox]

The Grabby One's Russian problem is much worse than the extremist assault on an consulate in the rebel city of Benghazi.

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

GOP Rally behind their Putrid leader who, rather than make America Great again, is more than willing to sell out our position the post WWII world our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. He is willing to let the German Chancellor become the leader of the free world.

Ironic isn't it?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

Uh-huh, get back to me when we have something that approximates actual evidence.

The fact that some people appear to think that a media report containing speculation and innuendo is a viable substitute for actual evidence explains why it would be so easy for a foreign government to manipulate U.S. public opinion and there is no way to prevent that without someone coming up with a cure for the gullibility and intellectual laziness of vast swaths of the American Electorate.

 

[Bush92]

The thing I probably love the most about the NEW desperate, careless, speak-without-thinking Democrats is that despite what they are covertly trying to do they can't help but broadcast their lying / deceptive plans to the world before / as they do it...

CASE IN POINT:
Top Elected Snowflake Schumer publicly declared to the world that Democrats are 100% committed to the failure of the United States government, to obstruct anything and everything Congress (the GOP and President) seek to pass, no matter how good it might be for the country and American people, because they HATE Donald Trump that much and they only want what is best for the Democratic Party - Screw the country and the American people.

Not long after, when Gorsuch came up for a potential vote, Schumer and top Democrats - ALL who had previously praised him, called him the best candidate to fill the USSC opening, and who they had voted for to be a Federal Judge - suddenly claimed they had concerns over Gorsuch's appointment.... BUT IT WAS TOO LATE. By already declaring to the world they were 100% committed to OBSTRUCTING EVERYTHING they had already shown their hand. EVERYONE at that point knew the objection by Schumer and the Democrats was purely partisan butt-hurt hatred for Trump. THEY SHOULD HAVE KEPT THEIR MOUTH SHUT AND JUST DO WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO.

File this one under 'YOU SHOULD HAVE KEPT YOUR MOUTH SHUT', too:

10 Months+ of investigations into Russia-Trump connections / collusions / crimes by butt-hurt snowflakes has resulted in the CIA, DIA, FBI, NSA, House Intel Committee, and top ranking Democrats (Schumer, Pelosi, Feinstein, Waters, etc...) all declaring there NEVER was any evidence of a crime, there is NO crime, there NEVER was any evidence of collusion, IS NO evidence of collusion, is NO Obstruction (by TRUMP), and Trump was NEVER / IS NOT under investigation.

Comey's testimony destroyed all of the Democrats' false accusations against Trump - not to mention their hopes and dreams of Impeaching Trump - by confirming this. Their last hope is Mueller, who was hired as an 'INDEPENDENT' Counsel to investigate Trump-Russian Connection / Collusion. Since Comey just testified none of that exists - there never was / is no evidence to support that, there is no need for Mueller and his Special Counsel, so it should be immediately disbanded and Mueller fired.

Mueller and the Democrats are not even trying to hide their real intent with this 'Independent' Counsel crap, either. Mueller and recently Fired self-identified Leaker Comey and Mueller are thick as thieves. Mueller was Comey's mentor. Add in the fact that Mueller has brought in DONORS and the Clinton's Lawyer to be part of his team, and this circus just became a full-fledged partisan political Lynch Mob minus the torches and pitch forks. (...give them time.)

As if that was not enough - again, Democrats don't know when to shut up - Give them time and they will tell you exactly what they are up to:

"DEMS VOW TO PUSH RUSSIA THROUGH ELECTION..."

'Winner, winner, Chicken Dinner!'

Despite being completely DE-BUNKED (ZERO EVIDENCE that ANYTHING EVER happened) while implicating several of their 0wn members as CRIMINALS, the Democrats' plan is an obvious one: "

"Keep pushing the lies and false, un-substantiated accusations through to the 2018 election and MAYBE 'we' can reverse the Gawd-awful 1,000+ election losses and 2 back-to-back historic record-setting election losses Streak!"

Gee, the Democrats are just too smart for people - WHO could have guessed that was their plan?!

View attachment 132942


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article155988584.html


“We can't keep campaigning on the same tired messages we've been using since 2010,” said one Democratic strategist, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. “In case people haven't noticed, we keep losing."



The average American doesn't care how butt-hurt over losing the Democrats are or how they feel they have a 'score to settle' with Trump, or especially about their '100% commitment' to ensure every attempt by the GOP and Trump make to make things better fails. THEY DON'T WANT THE GOP AND TRUMP TO FAIL BECAUSE THAT EFFECTS THEIR LIVES:

“The average person is like, ‘OK, what about my life out here today in the country?’” said RoseAnn DeMoro, executive director of National Nurses United.

She called the focus on Russia a “strategic error” that Democrats have resorted to because it distracts from their own lack of an agenda. It is political fighting that has very little to do with their everyday lives,” said DeMoro, a stalwart liberal advocate who has been openly critical of the Democratic Party."


The Democratic Party Agenda, as declared by DNC Leader Chuck Schumer and top strategists, consists of:

1. 100% commitment to ensure the US government, the GOP, and President Trump FAIL at every effort, no matter what it is, to make things better in the US for the nation and for the American people, which in their minds is what is best for the Democratic party.

2. Keep focusing on the non-existent 'Russia-Trump' scandal while ignoring their constituents who want more than just a platform for and acts of Partisan HATE from their elected Democratic Party politicians.

If those two things are the only things Democrats do between now and 2018, they will only succeed in adding to their 1,000+ election loss total.

And their scheme has led to violence today against Republicans.

 

[Faun]

Really? How many of our ambassadors and service personnel has the "Russian problem" killed?

A German Chancellor as the "leader of the free world" is probably a change for the better given the warmongering fuck ups that have been running things in Washington for the last few decades.

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

So Obama lied again.

Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

BUH-BAM!

GAME, SET, AND MATCH...

LOLOL

You dumbass cons are a fucking riot.



Obama never said Russia didn't hack our elections.

He said they didn't tamper with votes at the polls. You read a fake headline and that's all it takes to render you mentally helpless.

 

[BlindBoo]

Why don't RWs want it investigated and Russia stopped from doing it again?

Isn't it obvious? The "RWs" are all Russian Agents working toward a neo-Czarist Rule of the U.S..

I knew it! Darn traitors.

 

[easyt65]

While the deaths in Benghazi were tragic without a doubt, the assault on our election process by the Russians to favor the one candidate over another will have much more lingering consequences for us and the world than the assault.

That's your theory, however there are a few points you seem to have left out of it:

1.) There is no definitive proof that the Russians interfered to "favor one candidate over another", nobody has even come up with a plausible motive as to why the Russians would have preferred one of the two major party candidates and it still hasn't been established beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Russian Government behind it.
2.) Foreign governments and related organizations have been engaged in public opinion manipulation pursuant to elections for decades and we've been doing the same thing to other countries for decades.
3.) The current allegations against the Russian Government amount to the leaking of information garnered from "stolen" emails and disseminating "fake news"; which is no different than the two major U.S. Political Parties and their legions of loyal lemmings do to each other all the time.

Even if the allegations are 100% accurate there was no "assault" on our election system, it would amount to manipulation of public opinion which hardly an unprecedented occurrence.

So what if the investigation goes into the 2018 election cycle? If the Dems are successful in taking over one of the chambers in 2018 I bet they can stretch it out to 2020.

IMHO If it goes into the 2018 cycle and remains the primary (one might credibly argue "sole") focus of the Democratic campaign efforts it's likely to do them more harm than good since negative campaigning tends to suppress turnout which generally isn't good for Democrats not to mention it's likely to galvanize "Trump Voters" to turn out.

"But in recent weeks, news has emerged that suggests Russian efforts to meddle with the election went far beyond influencing media coverage, and may have targeted voting systems as well. Last week, The Intercept reported that Russian military intelligence had executed a cyberattack on a U.S. voting software company. (The source who allegedly leaked the highly classified intelligence report was subsequently arrested.) Now, Bloomberg reports that the Russian incursions went even deeper than previously thought. According to three people with direct knowledge of the investigation into the cyberattacks, Russia may have infiltrated voter databases and software systems in 39 U.S. states during the 2016 election—almost twice as many states as previously reported."

Russia May Have Hacked Election Systems in 39 States

So Obama lied again.

Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

BUH-BAM!

GAME, SET, AND MATCH...

LOLOL

You dumbass cons are a fucking riot.



Obama never said Russia didn't hack our elections.

He said they didn't tamper with votes at the polls. You read a fake headline and that's all it takes to render you mentally helpless.

Obama also knew about what the Russians were supposedly doing and yet did nothing about it. It was reported that he as so worried about working out the details with Vlad on his plan to invade Syria that he did not address it because the talks might have fallen apart...and the last thing Obama wanted was his plan to drag the US into an Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized war to fall apart....