The Democrat Party is owned by AIPAC, and they just admitted it

[EMH]

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5823840-dnc-aipac-resolution-fails/

"A Democratic National Committee (DNC) panel voted on Thursday to reject a resolution condemning “the growing influence” of dark money and corporate-backed outside spending in Democratic races, particularly the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). "




Translation = the "conspiracy to steal money from the taxpayer" doesn't care where the money comes from or what it stands for, they are completely treasonous whores and they will always sell out to AIPAC as they have on 911 and many other issues.

 

[JoeB131]

Both parties are owned by AIPAC.

Deal with it.

Only one was stupid enough to go to war with Iran for them, though.

 

[EMH]

Both parties are owned by AIPAC.

Deal with it.

Only one was stupid enough to go to war with Iran for them, though.

Another Exhibit A of why a robust third party is needed...

 

[SaxonJackson]

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5823840-dnc-aipac-resolution-fails/

"A Democratic National Committee (DNC) panel voted on Thursday to reject a resolution condemning “the growing influence” of dark money and corporate-backed outside spending in Democratic races, particularly the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). "




Translation = the "conspiracy to steal money from the taxpayer" doesn't care where the money comes from or what it stands for, they are completely treasonous whores and they will always sell out to AIPAC as they have on 911 and many other issues.

Both Parties (or the ONE Party) is owned by AIPAC!

Search out your Reps and Senators and see for yourself how much influence this foreign lobby has over our bribed Congressional leaders:

Track AIPAC - Follow Israel lobby spending in U.S. politics

Track AIPAC provides in-depth analysis and insights into the influence of the Israel lobby on U.S. democracy. Our mission is to foster transparency and accountability by tracking lobbying efforts and their impact on American policy. Stay informed and engage with our research on this critical issue.

www.trackaipac.com

Now you know why Trump HATES America First, Thomas Massie!!

 

[krichton]

Of course, they're owned by AIPAC, but why leave out the GOP? They're literally two sides of the same coin. Trump is in Iran right now because Israel. AIPAC controls all of Washington!

 

[JoeB131]

Another Exhibit A of why a robust third party is needed...

Third parties are jokes.

There's a reason why a third party never lasts. (The last big one being the Reform Party, which had a big old Sugar Daddy in the form or Ross Perot.) The ones that get above single digits are usually built around a personality - Perot, John Anderson, George Wallace, Strom Thurmond. When that personality either loses or migrates back to a mainstream party, the movement folds.

The thing to remember about both the Republicans and Democrats is that they are coalitions of interest groups. When a coalition member isn't getting what they want out of the deal, they frequently migrate to the other party (Like Southern racist whites did in the 1980s when the Democrats decided they liked black people more).

The thing that makes the Zionists clever is that they play both sides, and give away a lot of money.

The only organized resistance to Zionists in this country is the so-called "Squad", and AIPAC spends big to make sure that it doesn't grow.

They just dumped a ton of money into IL to make sure Squad members didn't win. Israel wasn't even an issue in those races, but they spent anyway.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Obsession.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I'm gonna giggle my rear end off when they again fail at ousting the America first statesman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie.

 

[EMH]

Third parties are jokes.

There's a reason why a third party never lasts. (The last big one being the Reform Party, which had a big old Sugar Daddy in the form or Ross Perot.) The ones that get above single digits are usually built around a personality - Perot, John Anderson, George Wallace, Strom Thurmond. When that personality either loses or migrates back to a mainstream party, the movement folds.

The thing to remember about both the Republicans and Democrats is that they are coalitions of interest groups. When a coalition member isn't getting what they want out of the deal, they frequently migrate to the other party (Like Southern racist whites did in the 1980s when the Democrats decided they liked black people more).

The thing that makes the Zionists clever is that they play both sides, and give away a lot of money.

The only organized resistance to Zionists in this country is the so-called "Squad", and AIPAC spends big to make sure that it doesn't grow.

They just dumped a ton of money into IL to make sure Squad members didn't win. Israel wasn't even an issue in those races, but they spent anyway.

LOL!!!

The last one was Perot. He ran with Dems over 40% and the GOP at 35%, no room.

Today, Dems and GOP 27% each, 55% total, meaning 40% beats both = doable now, not then

 

[JoeB131]

LOL!!!

The last one was Perot. He ran with Dems over 40% and the GOP at 35%, no room.

Today, Dems and GOP 27% each, 55% total, meaning 40% beats both = doable now, not then

Actually, if anything, there is LESS daylight between the parties.

Even in an election with simply horrible candidates (2016), the most third parties were able to muster was 6%.

 

[EMH]

Actually, if anything, there is LESS daylight between the parties.

Even in an election with simply horrible candidates (2016), the most third parties were able to muster was 6%.

That is assuming the "third parties" all stay 1% or less.


If Rogan, Candace, Massey, MTG, Tucker, Megyn, and others all join together to preach to their audiences that there is a move to LP or another to create the much needed third party, it would be over 20% in a week, over 40% by Nov 2028...

 

[JoeB131]

That is assuming the "third parties" all stay 1% or less.


If Rogan, Candace, Massey, MTG, Tucker, Megyn, and others all join together to preach to their audiences that there is a move to LP or another to create the much needed third party, it would be over 20% in a week, over 40% by Nov 2028...

Unlikely.

First and foremost, they'd need a candidate, and frankly, not a one of them is viable.

Second, they are all (except maybe Kelly) on the far right fringe, not the center, which is where a third party would need to be to gain traction.

Secondly, to have traction, they would have to work on a whole variety of issues to attract from both sides, or address issues that both parties were ignoring.

In the case of Perot, he attacked deficits (which Clinton embraced) and free trade (which the GOP eventually embraced). that did him good for one cycle, but not two. In 1992, he got 17% of the vote. By 1996, he was down to 8%. by 2000, when Pat Buchanan hijacked what was left of the Reform Party, it slipped to 1% of the vote.

Another key point. Third parties don't like to be blamed when they shift the election. In 2000, Ralph Nader was blamed for Bush's win. In 2004, the Green Party put up a placeholder. In 2016, the Libertarians and Greens were blamed for Trump. The next cycle, they put up non-entities.

 

[22lcidw]

Unlikely.

First and foremost, they'd need a candidate, and frankly, not a one of them is viable.

Second, they are all (except maybe Kelly) on the far right fringe, not the center, which is where a third party would need to be to gain traction.

Secondly, to have traction, they would have to work on a whole variety of issues to attract from both sides, or address issues that both parties were ignoring.

In the case of Perot, he attacked deficits (which Clinton embraced) and free trade (which the GOP eventually embraced). that did him good for one cycle, but not two. In 1992, he got 17% of the vote. By 1996, he was down to 8%. by 2000, when Pat Buchanan hijacked what was left of the Reform Party, it slipped to 1% of the vote.

Another key point. Third parties don't like to be blamed when they shift the election. In 2000, Ralph Nader was blamed for Bush's win. In 2004, the Green Party put up a placeholder. In 2016, the Libertarians and Greens were blamed for Trump. The next cycle, they put up non-entities.

Perot got Clinton voted in twice.

 

[Alicia J]

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5823840-dnc-aipac-resolution-fails/

"A Democratic National Committee (DNC) panel voted on Thursday to reject a resolution condemning “the growing influence” of dark money and corporate-backed outside spending in Democratic races, particularly the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). "




Translation = the "conspiracy to steal money from the taxpayer" doesn't care where the money comes from or what it stands for, they are completely treasonous whores and they will always sell out to AIPAC as they have on 911 and many other issues.

If anyone is owned by AIPAC, it's Trump. Fighting this disastrous war against Iran.

 

[JoeB131]

Perot got Clinton voted in twice.

No, Clinton got Clinton voted in twice.

teh fact that Perot gained as much as he did shows he drew from both parties. Polls that removed Perot from the equation showed Clinton easily beating both Bush and Dole. (And Dole was just pathetic, in any case.)

 

[EMH]

First and foremost, they'd need a candidate, and frankly, not a one of them is viable.

Wanna bet Tulsi has had enough of Only Israel Matters Party?

Now compare Tulsi running as a 3rd party after being the only Trump cabinet official to tell him the truth and advise him to stay out.... yeah.... compared to Vance and Kamala.... LOL!!!

Tulsi in a LANDSLIDE....


The NOBI Party... that's its name....


The "Not Owned by Israel" Party

 

[EMH]

If anyone is owned by AIPAC, it's Trump. Fighting this disastrous war against Iran.

So, refresh us about "your take" on Epstein files...

You didn't care. During the entire Biden Presidency, you didn't care, never pushed for it. Then, suddenly, around April of 2025, all of a sudden YOU DEMANDED Epstein files all be released and started accusing Donald Trump of being on Epstein Island....


Why?

Why did the whole Trump/Epstein noise start in April of 2025?

What changed?

 

[Alicia J]

So, refresh us about "your take" on Epstein files...

You didn't care. During the entire Biden Presidency, you didn't care, never pushed for it. Then, suddenly, around April of 2025, all of a sudden YOU DEMANDED Epstein files all be released and started accusing Donald Trump of being on Epstein Island....


Why?

Why did the whole Trump/Epstein noise start in April of 2025?

What changed?

Because it was obvious that Trump did a lot of bad stuff with Epstein. It's not complicated.

 

[EMH]

Because it was obvious that Trump did a lot of bad stuff with Epstein. It's not complicated.

But when Biden was President, you weren't calling for Epstein files to be opened.


ONLY IN APRIL OF 2025 DID YOU AND YOUR PARTY START CALLING FOR EPSTEIN FILES TO BE OPENED???

WHY THEN?

 

[Dogmaphobe]