And, the Totalitarian Mask Police Round Up Non-Compliers

Fair...but the act of breathing without a mask is also an imposition on others...
Why? Because I might spread a disease?

When does it end? Flu outbreaks? Cold outbreaks?

How much of an imposition will you be allowed to put on me simply because I'm in the same room as your breathing air?

If you think this is ever going to end, you are smoking crack (and doing it in my presence). You are setting a precedent for this shit to be permanent and forever.

Is this the kind of place you want to live in? Not me.

I've been trying to figure out how to wear a mask in public for years. Anti-mask laws prohibited it.

Yup. And its a Felony to wear a mask and carry a gun in public in many jurisdictions. Im just waiting for these two contradictory laws to collide...
It would not surprise me one bit if that were the goal.

Zealous gun-grabbing prosecutors (see St. Louis) wait to catch a licensed concealed carry person carrying while being forced to mask, then prosecute them for a felony.

What a great end-round way to suppress gun rights.
never wear a mask while carrying. it's simple.
 
Fair...but the act of breathing without a mask is also an imposition on others...
Why? Because I might spread a disease?

When does it end? Flu outbreaks? Cold outbreaks?

How much of an imposition will you be allowed to put on me simply because I'm in the same room as your breathing air?

If you think this is ever going to end, you are smoking crack (and doing it in my presence). You are setting a precedent for this shit to be permanent and forever.

Is this the kind of place you want to live in? Not me.

I've been trying to figure out how to wear a mask in public for years. Anti-mask laws prohibited it.

Yup. And its a Felony to wear a mask and carry a gun in public in many jurisdictions. Im just waiting for these two contradictory laws to collide...
It would not surprise me one bit if that were the goal.

Zealous gun-grabbing prosecutors (see St. Louis) wait to catch a licensed concealed carry person carrying while being forced to mask, then prosecute them for a felony.

What a great end-round way to suppress gun rights.

The more you post, the better the argument that background checks - including comments made on Social Media - needs to be sourced before someone like you could be granted the privilege*** to own a firearm.

***See Heller and Scalia's comment on Felons and the Mentally Ill on the 2nd Amendment.
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

Who has the obligation to surrender their rights?

What is the purpose of society again? What happens when the benefits of society are outweighed by the burdens?

It is a burden on society if you infect others with this virus or get infected. What is the benefit of this?
You do not have the right to infect others with this virus. This is serious stuff and you think it is a joke. What a fool.

there's no right to good health. Son, how does someone get the flu? people with flu die. People use their phones in the car illegally and kill people in auto accidents. Drunk Drivers kill people for for fking ever. you're another demofk covered with layers of stupid.

You have NO right to infect me with your shit if you were warned by the medical profession that wearing a mask would probably prevent it. Drunk drivers kill people for fucking ever and they pay a price for doing that, as should people who use their cell phones in cars illegally. Use some common sense, hotshot. You are ignorant and have the mentality of a highschool dropout. Stop politicizing it and wear a fucking mask, or stand on ceremony and maybe get this virus. Your mouth has gotten in the way of what few brains you have.
 
COVID-19 transmission via the eyes is a possibility, because of conjunctival ACE2 receptors.
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

sure they do have that right. there are no rights to life. you're just a confused demofk. but hey, thanks for nothing.

Why would you want to infect other people? For a cheap thrill? People are being arrested for not wearing a mask, so
maybe we will see about your rights.
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

Who has the obligation to surrender their rights?

What is the purpose of society again? What happens when the benefits of society are outweighed by the burdens?

It is a burden on society if you infect others with this virus or get infected. What is the benefit of this?
You do not have the right to infect others with this virus. This is serious stuff and you think it is a joke. What a fool.

there's no right to good health. Son, how does someone get the flu? people with flu die. People use their phones in the car illegally and kill people in auto accidents. Drunk Drivers kill people for for fking ever. you're another demofk covered with layers of stupid.

You have NO right to infect me with your shit if you were warned by the medical profession that wearing a mask would probably prevent it. Drunk drivers kill people for fucking ever and they pay a price for doing that, as should people who use their cell phones in cars illegally. Use some common sense, hotshot. You are ignorant and have the mentality of a highschool dropout. Stop politicizing it and wear a fucking mask, or stand on ceremony and maybe get this virus. Your mouth has gotten in the way of what few brains you have.

Sure I do. You have no right to good health. Post the statute
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

sure they do have that right. there are no rights to life. you're just a confused demofk. but hey, thanks for nothing.

Why would you want to infect other people? For a cheap thrill? People are being arrested for not wearing a mask, so
maybe we will see about your rights.

A mask doesn’t protect anyone. Post the study. You’re very misinformed
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

sure they do have that right. there are no rights to life. you're just a confused demofk. but hey, thanks for nothing.

Why would you want to infect other people? For a cheap thrill? People are being arrested for not wearing a mask, so
maybe we will see about your rights.

A mask doesn’t protect anyone. Post the study. You’re very misinformed

Who is giving you your information? Trump?
  • Patient Care
  • June 26, 2020
Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus
By Nina Bai
As states reopen from stay-at-home orders, many, including California, are now requiring people to wear face coverings in most public spaces to reduce the spread of COVID-19.
Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization now recommend cloth masks for the general public, but earlier in the pandemic, both organizations recommended just the opposite. These shifting guidelines may have sowed confusion among the public about the utility of masks.
But health experts say the evidence is clear that masks can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and that the more people wearing masks, the better.
We talked to UC San Francisco epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.
Why did the CDC change its guidance on wearing masks?
The original CDC guidance partly was based on what was thought to be low disease prevalence earlier in the pandemic, said Chin-Hong.
“So, of course, you’re preaching that the juice isn’t really worth the squeeze to have the whole population wear masks in the beginning – but that was really a reflection of not having enough testing, anyway,” he said. “We were getting a false sense of security.”
Rutherford was more blunt. The legitimate concern that the limited supply of surgical masks and N95 respirators should be saved for health care workers should not have prevented more nuanced messaging about the benefits of masking. “We should have told people to wear cloth masks right off the bat,” he said.
Another factor “is that culturally, the U.S. wasn’t really prepared to wear masks,” unlike some countries in Asia where the practice is more common, said Chin-Hong. Even now, some Americans are choosing to ignore CDC guidance and local mandates on masks, a hesitation that Chin-Hong says is “foolhardy.”
What may have finally convinced the CDC to change its guidance in favor of masks were rising disease prevalence and a clearer understanding that both pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic transmission are possible – even common. Studies have found that viral load peaks in the days before symptoms begin and that speaking is enough to expel virus-carrying droplets.
“I think the biggest thing with COVID now that shapes all of this guidance on masks is that we can’t tell who’s infected,” said Chin-Hong. “You can’t look in a crowd and say, oh, that person should wear mask. There’s a lot of asymptomatic infection, so everybody has to wear a mask.”
What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?
There are several strands of evidence supporting the efficacy of masks.
One category of evidence comes from laboratory studies of respiratory droplets and the ability of various masks to block them. An experiment using high-speed video found that hundreds of droplets ranging from 20 to 500 micrometers were generated when saying a simple phrase, but that nearly all these droplets were blocked when the mouth was covered by a damp washcloth. Another study of people who had influenza or the common cold found that wearing a surgical mask significantly reduced the amount of these respiratory viruses emitted in droplets and aerosols.
But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”
A recent study published in Health Affairs, for example, compared the COVID-19 growth rate before and after mask mandates in 15 states and the District of Columbia. It found that mask mandates led to a slowdown in daily COVID-19 growth rate, which became more apparent over time. The first five days after a mandate, the daily growth rate slowed by 0.9 percentage-points compared to the five days prior to the mandate; at three weeks, the daily growth rate had slowed by 2 percentage-points.
Another study looked at coronavirus deaths across 198 countries and found that those with cultural norms or government policies favoring mask-wearing had lower death rates.
Two compelling case reports also suggest that masks can prevent transmission in high-risk scenarios, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford. In one case, a man flew from China to Toronto and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. He had a dry cough and wore a mask on the flight, and all 25 people closest to him on the flight tested negative for COVID-19. In another case, in late May, two hair stylists in Missouri had close contact with 140 clients while sick with COVID-19. Everyone wore a mask and none of the clients tested positive.
Do masks protect the people wearing them or the people around them?
“I think there’s enough evidence to say that the best benefit is for people who have COVID-19 to protect them from giving COVID-19 to other people, but you’re still going to get a benefit from wearing a mask if you don’t have COVID-19,” said Chin-Hong.
Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.
Another factor to remember, noted Rutherford, is that you could still catch the virus through the membranes in your eyes, a risk that masking does not eliminate.
“You should always wear masks and socially distance,” said Rutherford. “I would be hesitant to try to parse it apart. But, yes, I think mask wearing is more important.”
  • Patient Care
  • Jul. 6, 2020
  • I don't understand how you do not know this. You need to read more so that you can be your own person.
  • Trump thinks he knows more than the medical experts and his "knowledge" may put you in the hospital.
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

Who has the obligation to surrender their rights?

What is the purpose of society again? What happens when the benefits of society are outweighed by the burdens?

It is a burden on society if you infect others with this virus or get infected. What is the benefit of this?
You do not have the right to infect others with this virus. This is serious stuff and you think it is a joke. What a fool.

there's no right to good health. Son, how does someone get the flu? people with flu die. People use their phones in the car illegally and kill people in auto accidents. Drunk Drivers kill people for for fking ever. you're another demofk covered with layers of stupid.

You have NO right to infect me with your shit if you were warned by the medical profession that wearing a mask would probably prevent it. Drunk drivers kill people for fucking ever and they pay a price for doing that, as should people who use their cell phones in cars illegally. Use some common sense, hotshot. You are ignorant and have the mentality of a highschool dropout. Stop politicizing it and wear a fucking mask, or stand on ceremony and maybe get this virus. Your mouth has gotten in the way of what few brains you have.

Sure I do. You have no right to good health. Post the statute

Don't need a statute. Emergency times call for emergency measures by government. Think just a little. Think about other people instead of only yourself. Wear a mask--it won't bite you. Use some common sense. I may not have to right to good health, and you do not have the right to deliberately infect me.
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

Who has the obligation to surrender their rights?

What is the purpose of society again? What happens when the benefits of society are outweighed by the burdens?

It is a burden on society if you infect others with this virus or get infected. What is the benefit of this?
You do not have the right to infect others with this virus. This is serious stuff and you think it is a joke. What a fool.

there's no right to good health. Son, how does someone get the flu? people with flu die. People use their phones in the car illegally and kill people in auto accidents. Drunk Drivers kill people for for fking ever. you're another demofk covered with layers of stupid.

You have NO right to infect me with your shit if you were warned by the medical profession that wearing a mask would probably prevent it. Drunk drivers kill people for fucking ever and they pay a price for doing that, as should people who use their cell phones in cars illegally. Use some common sense, hotshot. You are ignorant and have the mentality of a highschool dropout. Stop politicizing it and wear a fucking mask, or stand on ceremony and maybe get this virus. Your mouth has gotten in the way of what few brains you have.

Sure I do. You have no right to good health. Post the statute

Don't need a statute. Emergency times call for emergency measures by government. Think just a little. Think about other people instead of only yourself. Wear a mask--it won't bite you. Use some common sense. I may not have to right to good health, and you do not have the right to deliberately infect me.

Fuck off.

Keep up this bullshit, and I will get payback.

I will deliberately infect the fuck out of you and you will do NOTHING but cry about it!

I will deliberately catch the virus, wear crothless sheer panties on my face (does not shield anything) and sneeze/cough/spit on as many people as possible.

I will make you pay for this shit for the rest of your miserable lives. My healthy ass will become a virus-spreading machine.

And I won't stop there, either. You name it! I will do my best to catch SARS, Ebola, THE FUCKING PLAGUE, ASS CRABS!!

I will become a walking bio weapon on your authoritarian asses. YOU WILL PAY!

Now, take your "common sense" bullshit and SHOVE IT UP YOUR FUCKING ASS!!!
 
Last edited:


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

Who has the obligation to surrender their rights?

What is the purpose of society again? What happens when the benefits of society are outweighed by the burdens?

It is a burden on society if you infect others with this virus or get infected. What is the benefit of this?
You do not have the right to infect others with this virus. This is serious stuff and you think it is a joke. What a fool.

there's no right to good health. Son, how does someone get the flu? people with flu die. People use their phones in the car illegally and kill people in auto accidents. Drunk Drivers kill people for for fking ever. you're another demofk covered with layers of stupid.

You have NO right to infect me with your shit if you were warned by the medical profession that wearing a mask would probably prevent it. Drunk drivers kill people for fucking ever and they pay a price for doing that, as should people who use their cell phones in cars illegally. Use some common sense, hotshot. You are ignorant and have the mentality of a highschool dropout. Stop politicizing it and wear a fucking mask, or stand on ceremony and maybe get this virus. Your mouth has gotten in the way of what few brains you have.

Sure I do. You have no right to good health. Post the statute

Don't need a statute. Emergency times call for emergency measures by government. Think just a little. Think about other people instead of only yourself. Wear a mask--it won't bite you. Use some common sense. I may not have to right to good health, and you do not have the right to deliberately infect me.

Fuck off.

Keep up this bullshit, and I will get payback.

I will deliberately infect the fuck out of you and you will do NOTHING but cry about it!

I will deliberately catch the virus, wear crothless sheer panties on my face (does not shield anything) and sneeze/cough/spit on as many people as possible.

I will make you pay for this shit for the rest of your miserable lives. My healthy ass will become a virus-spreading machine.

And I won't stop there, either. You name it! I will do my best to catch SARS, Ebola, THE FUCKING PLAGUE, ASS CRABS!!

I will become a walking bio weapon on your authoritarian asses. YOU WILL PAY!

Now, take your "common sense" bullshit and SHOVE IT UP YOUR FUCKING ASS!!!

Are you as ignorant and stupid as you sound? Ya. Obviously you are lacking in common sense and are a highschool dropout with a 5th-grade mentality, yes?
 
Don't need a statute. Emergency times call for emergency measures by government. Think just a little. Think about other people instead of only yourself. Wear a mask--it won't bite you. Use some common sense. I may not have to right to good health, and you do not have the right to deliberately infect me.
First amendment gives me that right. I don't owe you shit. stay away from me then, that is your right. but dude, take your shaming game somewhere else, it doesn't work here.
that's all folks.gif
 


This has to be challenged. It cannot stand.

What has to change is for people wear masks in public places. They have rights, yes. They do not have the right to infect other people with this disease.
They are violating other people's rights to not be infected by those who don't care about anyone but themselves.

sure they do have that right. there are no rights to life. you're just a confused demofk. but hey, thanks for nothing.

Why would you want to infect other people? For a cheap thrill? People are being arrested for not wearing a mask, so
maybe we will see about your rights.

A mask doesn’t protect anyone. Post the study. You’re very misinformed

crgvryb2lq951.jpg
 
Can't debate stupid. really. you think I believe all of the hoax numbers. I don't. the CDC moved the deaths from all other categories and called them all Wuhan deaths. neat trick!! I didn't fall for it.

BTW, the relapse is all nonsense. It was an effort to shut back down the states, and it ain't gonna work.

Fk masks, the most damning counts that were noted were from nursing homes where the number one tool was a facemask. So fk off junior.
 
Can't debate stupid. really. you think I believe all of the hoax numbers. I don't. the CDC moved the deaths from all other categories and called them all Wuhan deaths. neat trick!! I didn't fall for it.

BTW, the relapse is all nonsense. It was an effort to shut back down the states, and it ain't gonna work.

Fk masks, the most damning counts that were noted were from nursing homes where the number one tool was a facemask. So fk off junior.
Of course, it means 65 percent of excess deaths are caused directly by covid.


"deaths caused by the response to the pandemic. People who never had the virus may have died from other causes because of the spillover effects of the pandemic, such as delayed medical care, economic hardship, or emotional distress."


Trump is almost responsible for 80 thousand deaths, congrats.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top