And so it begins.

[hadit]

Here comes Project 2025.

Be sure to tell us when it gets here. There's no sign of it yet.

 

[struth]

And it won't be because the appeal is going to be dropped. There is no point in pursuing it now that trump has the power to void all the indictments against him. The gravest denial of justice regarding the criminal acts of a then prez, now prez-elect, in US history.

So it's good law. Thanks for playing.

 

[berg80]

We don't know that. Its time to investigate to find that out. Based on some of his record, it doesn't look good.

‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

Special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought federal charges against former President Donald Trump, is an “overzealous” prosecutor who relies on ethically dubious tactics, including media leaks and enticing witnesses, say those who have been caught in his snare.

www.washingtontimes.com

You should just stick with character assassination like what's in that article.

Here's how I think this will play out.

Trump allies push to punish Jack Smith in first test of retribution vow Even as Jack Smith moved to wind down his federal election interference case against Donald Trump on Friday, House Republicans took an initial step toward investigating the special counsel, setting up an early test of how...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You know trump has promised politically motivated investigations of enemies, right?

I hope he does but I doubt he will.

 

[marvin martian]

That's another lie.

Did Alvin Bragg campaign on a promise to prosecute Trump? What we know

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg resided over Trump's guilty verdict, but several high-profile Republicans have accused him of playing political games.

www.newsweek.com

It was fat ass Leticia James who campaigned specifically on "taking down" Trump.

I forget how small your cult is sometimes.

James, a former city council member in New York and public defender, launched her run for New York AG during the 2018 cycle, while emphasizing that if she were elected, she would aggressively pursue charges against Trump.

"I’m running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president when our fundamental rights are at stake. From the Muslim ban, to efforts to deport immigrants, to denying transgender students the ability to choose whatever bathroom they want, rolling back regulations to protect our planet, colluding with foreign powers, putting profits over people, dividing us in ways we haven’t seen in generations," James declared in September of 2018.

Letitia James vows to continue targeting Trump after years in the courtroom: 'Trump derangement syndrome'

 

[bigrebnc1775]

All of them

Bingo

 

[bigrebnc1775]

See post #74.

He fired them all

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You believe it's wrong, but you have no evidence on which to base your belief. For trumples, his prosecution is by definition corrupt because you just can't acknowledge his criminality.

Smith was illegally appointed he had no standing.

 

[FA_Q2]

How is that different than any other administration?

This.

At the end of the day, the president does get to staff his agencies and all others have done so.

 

[FA_Q2]

If he can prove that in court he'll be allowed to keep his freedom.

Wow.

Open lawfare right there.

Just another right winger openly supporting authoritarian rule while pretending they aren't.

 

[dblack]

Wow.

Open lawfare right there.

Just another right winger openly supporting authoritarian rule while pretending they aren't.

It's the Trumpster revenge tour. This is what many of them voted for.

 

[FA_Q2]

It's the Trumpster revenge tour. This is what many of them voted for.

Yes, it is and you can see it in the glee they display whenever talking about authoritarian dictates overriding the constitution.

 

[dblack]

Yes, it is and you can see it in the glee they display whenever talking about authoritarian dictates overriding the constitution.

It's different when they do it.

You'd think they'd be eager to show that they're NOT like Democrats.

 

[g5000]

“Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it).

Well, see, there's the hitch.

Trump has never had a "lawful agenda".

His lickspittles plan on getting rid of anyone with integrity who will get in the way of Dear Leader's plans.

 

[berg80]

If there was no lawfare, why did they have to illegally put someone in place to "prosecute" him only to drop the cases once the election was over?

This is lawfare............

The New York indictment, on charges of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment ahead of the 2016 election, was one of four levied against Trump last year as he again ran for president. His legal team successfully delayed the others with a series of sometimes long-shot appeals.

Trump’s election victory has now essentially torpedoed the two federal cases against him, and made it unlikely that a second state case in Georgia will proceed. Trump’s lawyers had already challenged the New York verdict based on a Supreme Court ruling a month later that greatly expanded presidential immunity. Since the election last week, they have expanded that effort, saying that it would be “in the interests of justice” to end the hush money case given recent events.
Opinion | If You Thought Trump Wasn’t Serious, Look at His First Appointments

That's one of those "up is down" comments that catches one's attention. The interest of justice will not be served in any of the cases trump was indicted for. For that to happen there would need to be trials and a verdicts. Not purposeful delays being rewarded.

 

[berg80]

I hope he does but I doubt he will.

Bored with the TV shows you're watching? Need some military style tribunals to watch?

 

[sparky]

It's the Trumpster revenge tour. This is what many of them voted for.

turnabout is fair play DB

~S~

 

[Thunk]

Wow.

Open lawfare right there.

Afraid to take a taste of your own medicine?

 

[struth]

This is lawfare............

The New York indictment, on charges of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment ahead of the 2016 election, was one of four levied against Trump last year as he again ran for president. His legal team successfully delayed the others with a series of sometimes long-shot appeals.

Trump’s election victory has now essentially torpedoed the two federal cases against him, and made it unlikely that a second state case in Georgia will proceed. Trump’s lawyers had already challenged the New York verdict based on a Supreme Court ruling a month later that greatly expanded presidential immunity. Since the election last week, they have expanded that effort, saying that it would be “in the interests of justice” to end the hush money case given recent events.
Opinion | If You Thought Trump Wasn’t Serious, Look at His First Appointments

That's one of those "up is down" comments that catches one's attention. The interest of justice will not be served in any of the cases trump was indicted for. For that to happen there would need to be trials and a verdicts. Not purposeful delays being rewarded.

Of course it was law fare. Hence why it was brought only after he announced he was running, and drop as soon as he won

 

[berg80]

Of course it was law fare. Hence why it was brought only after he announced he was running, and drop as soon as he won

We've been through that talking point. Remember? He declared his candidacy WAY EARLY so he could claim election interference over the indictments he knew were coming. When it comes to duping people he really is a stable genius.